With a combined revenue of $21 trillion and $2.1 trillion in profits, the 2026 Fortune 500 is the definitive list of America's largest companies.

Fortune 500

The 300 companies on this year’s list brought in over $12.5 trillion in revenue for the latest 12 months, with the median revenue figure at $24 billion.

America's Most Innovative Companies

Almost $20 trillion in revenue—and a record-breaking $1.87 trillion in profits. Introducing the 2025 Fortune 500, the definitive list of the biggest companies in America.

The 300 companies on this year’s list brought in over $12.6 trillion in revenue for the latest 12 months, with the median revenue figure at $22 billion.

Industries included in the sector are automotive retail, general merchandisers, internet retail, and specialty retail.

Fortune Sector Leaders: Retailing

The Fortune 500, in its 70th year in 2024, ranks the biggest U.S. companies by revenue.

The 25th Fortune World’s Most Admired Companies list suggests that tech giants’ peers respect them as much as ever.

World's Most Admired Companies

The Fortune 500, in its 69th year in 2023, ranks the biggest U.S. companies by revenue.

Just as it dominates our economy, Big Tech now dominates Fortune’s annual ranking of corporate reputation.

This year’s Fortune 500 marks the 68th running of the list.

After a year in which humanity leaned more heavily than ever on tech giants, see which companies topped Fortune's ranking of corporate reputation.

This year’s Fortune 500 marks the 67th running of the list.

F500-2021-217-Wayfair

Its digital platform offers 14 million furniture and home good items from more than 11,000 global suppliers. The company benefited from lockdowned shoppers investing in home furnishings, posting its first full year of profitability.

For an astounding 13th straight year, Apple claims the top spot in Fortune’s annual ranking of corporate reputation, based on a survey of almost 3,800 executives, directors, and analysts.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 66th running of the list.

F500-2020-348-Wayfair

The online home furnishings and decor business also includes Joss &amp; Main and Birch Lane in its portfolio of brands.

Here are the World's Most Admired Companies for 2019 as ranked in their industries. See who made the list.

From groceries to apparel to home decor, see which companies made the list.

Wayfair-Best Workplaces in Retail 2019

Employees say: 
“Wayfair provides you the opportunity to grow and push yourself to new heights. You're handed a lot of responsibility early on, and given the road map to succeed and rise up the ranks. If you have an idea, you can give it a shot.”

Best Large Workplaces in Retail

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 65th running of the list.

Here are the World's Most Admired Companies for 2018 as ranked in their industries. See who made the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 64th running of the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 63rd running of the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 62nd running of the list.

Sector

Industry

Industry Rank

Previous Industry Rank

Overall Score

Innovation

People Management

Use of Corporate Assets

Social Responsibility

Quality of Management

Financial Soundness

Long-Term Investment Value

Quality of Products/Services

Global Competitiveness

Company Info

Industry Vertical

Founded

HQ Location

Worldwide Employees

Worldwide Revenue

Last Year List

Last Year Rank

Web Address

Strongest Dimension

Years on list

Previous rank

State

Key Financials (last Fiscal Year)

Revenues ($M)

Profits ($M)

Assets ($M)

Total Stockholder Equity ($M)

Profit Ratios

Profit as % of Revenues

Profits as % of Assets

Profits as % of Stockholder Equity

Earnings Per Share (last Fiscal Year)

Earnings Per Share ($)

EPS % Change (from prior fiscal year)

EPS % Change (5 year annual rate)

EPS % Change (10 year annual rate)

Total Return

Total Return to Investors (last year)

Total Return to Investors (5 year, annualized)

Total Return to Investors (10 year, annualized)

Founded in 2002, e-commerce company Wayfair offers a wide range of home products, from furniture and appliances to gardening and decor, selling these both online and in physical brick-and-mortar stores. The company provides products under various brands, including Joss &amp; Main, AllModern, Birch Lane, Perigold, and Wayfair Professional.

Q2 2026

Q1 2026

Q4 2025

Q3 2025

Q2 2025

Q1 2025

Q4 2024

Q3 2024

Wayfair (W): Company Profile, Stock Price, News, Rankings

legacy

Wayfair

wayfair

Hello, everyone. Thank you for joining us, and welcome to the Wayfair Q2 2026 earnings release and conference call. After today's prepared remarks, we will host a question-and-answer session. If you would like to ask a question, please press star one to raise your hand. To withdraw your question, press star one again. I will now hand the conference over to Ryan Barney, Head of Investor Relations. Ryan, please go ahead.

Good morning, and thank you for joining us. Today, we will review our second quarter 2026 results. With me are Niraj Shah, Co-Founder, Chief Executive Officer, and Co-Chairman, Steve Conine, Co-Founder and Co-Chairman, and Kate Gulliver, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Administrative Officer. We will all be available for Q&A following today's prepared remarks. I would like to remind you that our call today will consist of forward-looking statements, including, but not limited to, those regarding our future prospects, business strategies, industry trends, and our financial performance, including guidance for the third quarter of 2026. All forward-looking statements made on today's call are based on information available to us as of today's date. We cannot guarantee that any forward-looking statements will be accurate, although we believe we have been reasonable in our expectations and assumptions.

Our 10K for 2025, our 10Q for this quarter, and our subsequent SEC filings identify certain factors that could cause the company's actual results to differ materially from those projected in any forward-looking statements made today. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any of these statements, whether as a result of any new information, future events, or otherwise. Please note that during this call, we will discuss certain non-GAAP financial measures as we review the company's performance, including contribution profit, contribution margin, adjusted EBITDA, adjusted EBITDA margin, and free cash flow. These non-GAAP financial measures should not be considered replacements for, and should be read together with, GAAP results.

Please refer to the investor relations section of our website to obtain a copy of our earnings release and investor presentation, which contain descriptions of our non-GAAP financial measures and reconciliations of non-GAAP measures to the nearest comparable GAAP measures. This call is being recorded, and a webcast will be available for replay on our IR website. I would now like to turn the call over to Niraj.

Thanks, Ryan, and good morning, everyone. We're pleased to be with you today to discuss our second quarter results. Q2 marked another strong quarter of share capture and top-line momentum with 7.5% net revenue growth. Our growth this quarter was fueled by momentum in orders, which were up by 6% for the period. Compared to Q1, orders were up over 12%, the best sequential growth we've seen in Q2 since the second quarter of 2020. AOV grew by 1.2% year-over-year, continuing a very consistent trend of low- to mid-single-digit growth that we've been seeing for years now. Active customers also continued its upward trend, growing by more than 3% year-over-year in Q2.

While there's still some broader macro uncertainty and depressed housing turnover, by our measure, this marked the first quarter of flat to slightly positive year-over-year category growth that we've seen in the U.S. since 2021. Those skewed towards higher growth in the higher-income segments. Our U.S. segment accelerated to nearly 9% year-over-year revenue growth, continuing the high-single-digit share spread we've held since last fall. In fact, revenue growth in the U.S. was the best we've seen in the entire post-COVID period. In keeping with the often discussed K-shaped recovery, we saw noteworthy outperformance from both our specialty retail brands, which grew by nearly 20% in the second quarter, and Perigold, which grew by more than 35% in the Luxury segment.

What is exciting for us is that we are seeing accelerating growth in the Wayfair business and complementing that with outsized growth in the Specialty and Luxury segments, all building to why we expect to see even further growth acceleration as our numerous initiatives further play out. Today, I'd like to spend a bit more time digging into Perigold, because it's a good example of one of our numerous initiatives, and the momentum we've seen there over the past few years has been tremendous. I'll start with a bit of history for those less familiar. We launched Perigold in 2017 with a simple thesis. The U.S. has roughly 15 million high-income households that together spend more than $100 billion a year on their homes. Prior to our entry, this customer had no real digital destination that matched the way she actually wants to shop.

The best design brands in the world, names like Century Furniture or Vanguard, were locked behind exclusive showrooms available to the trade only, or scattered across single-style, single-category competitors. Nobody had built the whole of luxury home into one platform that was simple to access. That gap was the opportunity, and it's exactly what we set out to close. Today, Perigold offers close to 3.5 million products from 1,500 brands, spanning every style and category of the home. We see a long runway simply in continuing to expand the breadth of what we already do well. You'll see us build the catalog over time, expanding our selection across classes like large appliances and kitchen cabinetry that historically were not offered on a luxury digital platform.

On the financial side, Perigold has grown at a double-digit rate every single year since launch, including 20+% growth in both 2024 and 2025, that growth has recently accelerated further. We posted robust double-digit year-over-year growth in both the first and second quarters of this year, meaningfully outpacing the broader luxury home market, which by our estimates and competitor reporting is growing in the low single digits. In round terms, Perigold is now a business doing a bit over $400 million a year in sales. Still modest next to wayfair.com's overall scale, but growing quickly and doing so profitably. Margins have also expanded even as we funded two store openings and stepped up our brand investment in Perigold. We have a clear line of sight to grow Perigold into a multibillion-dollar business in the years ahead.

Importantly, we intend to get there while expanding profitability, consistent with how we run every part of Wayfair. Driving the ongoing strength in Perigold is a substantial and growing customer file. We have an active customer base approaching 400,000, up nearly 20% year over year. That customer base spends almost three times what we see from a typical wayfair.com shopper in a single year. Roughly 40% of Perigold customers each year are entirely new to the Wayfair family of brands, which tells you this isn't just a repackaging of existing demand. We're pulling in a customer we would not otherwise reach. One who is more affluent and more resilient across economic cycles. While a novel aspect of Perigold is its B2C access and offering, our trade and business customer is a real and growing part of the story, too.

Following the relaunch of our trade program earlier this year, which introduced a simplified, more competitive discount structure for designers, architects, and other professionals, B2B has grown to an all-time high share of Perigold's volume. How do we differentiate against a highly fragmented competitive set? Our competitors range from a few national chains who have a specific design point of view to thousands of small independent shops, each with a limited selection. Perigold's advantage is breadth without compromising quality. We built curation standards around materials and construction so that everything from our opening price point up through the most exclusive design trade brands all meet a consistent bar. The selection overlap between Perigold and Wayfair is very narrow. By having both platforms, we offer customers the ability to shop the wide expanse of home under one umbrella and benefit from our loyalty programs, delivery capabilities, and technology features.

We are, for the large majority of our supplier base, the primary online partner, which means when a customer comes to Perigold, she's getting the deepest version of that brand's assortment anywhere online, not a curated subset. Just as important, Perigold isn't building all of this on its own. It draws directly on the infrastructure we spent nearly two decades building for Wayfair. Our logistics network, including CastleGate and our broader delivery network, gives Perigold a level of shipping speed and reliability that a business of its scale would be challenged to build independently. The same is true of our technology platform. Search, personalization, checkout, and all the engineering investment that goes into it. Our marketing engine, from our paid media scale to our supplier advertising programs.

Because Perigold can lean on that shared investment rather than duplicating it, its own team and dollars go almost entirely towards the things that make it distinctly luxury. Curation, brand, and service. That's a structural advantage a standalone luxury competitor simply doesn't have. It's a big part of why Perigold can punch so far above its weight. Because the luxury customer's bar for service is even higher than it is for the rest of our business, we built free white-glove delivery into the model, along with proactive high-touch order monitoring on larger purchases, which has driven meaningfully higher repeat rates and post-delivery satisfaction scores. This past year, we extended that differentiation by pushing into stores, opening our first two stores for Perigold in Houston and West Palm Beach. About 20% of our store staff are trained designers, offering complimentary design services both in store and virtually.

Those stores are already showing us average order values even higher than what we see online, alongside strong early design-led project pipelines. Real proof that the immersive high-touch model customers expect from luxury retail translates into our own four walls. We're seeing the same pattern in our virtual design business, where a small team is driving average order values many multiples of our typical online site order, precisely because pairing real design expertise with our vast catalog enables customers to embark on larger and more complex design projects. Let me now turn to where we're applying AI, because it's one of the clearest examples of how much a team of Perigold's size can get done with the right tools.

We recently wanted to feature a seasonal outdoor imagery spread, the kind of project that traditionally means location shoots, travel, styling crews, and can run into the millions of dollars and take months. Instead, we used a proprietary AI pipeline that was built in-house. It curates products that work together, composes them into a room, and renders it photorealistically using image models with automated quality checks on every image, and our stylists guiding the work to hold to Perigold's luxury standard. That's roughly $2 million in traditional production costs, travel, crews, studio time, replaced by less than $10,000. Well over a 99% reduction. It means we can refresh and expand imagery across our broad catalog far faster than would otherwise be possible. That quality bar matters enormously here, because a luxury shopper expects every image to look as considered and premium as the product itself.

She notices lighting, styling, and finish. This only works because the output meets that standard. We're extending these tools across product and environmental imagery, and we expect them to make our product pages steadily more complete and compelling over the coming quarters. It also means we can refresh and expand imagery far faster and more often than traditional production would allow. Beyond imagery, we're using AI to improve product content and merchandising accuracy across the catalog. We're building tools to help our design consultants, both our virtual team and the designers in our stores, source and present the right products to a customer faster. This builds on the broader company-wide investment we're making in AI, Perigold is a good example of how those platform-level capabilities pay off in a specific high-value part of the business.

As AI reshapes how customers discover and evaluate products, a curated luxury catalog like Perigold's, with its complexity and its emphasis on craftsmanship and detail. It's exactly the kind of place where these tools create outsized value, and we intend to keep leaning in. What are we most excited about looking ahead? There are a number of exciting efforts underway. Let me share a couple of examples. We're planning to launch a Perigold loyalty program later this year, purpose-built for our luxury customers. Also, in stores, Houston and West Palm Beach are still early, but the underlying signals, design-driven basket sizes, strong repeat interest, growing trade engagement, give us real conviction. Our ambition over the next several years is to grow our store presence across the country's luxury markets using the same test-and-scale approach we've used across every other part of the company.

We'll keep pushing on the fundamentals that got us here, broadening the catalog, deepening our trade offering, and continuing to raise the bar on availability, delivery, speed, and service, all of which translate directly into loyalty and repeat purchases from this customer. Perigold is a great example of something Steve and I have long believed about Wayfair: that this platform can extend into new customer segments and keep compounding for years to come. It also shows the discipline we try to bring to every part of the company. Grow quickly, but do it profitably, and keep reinvesting in the things that actually earn a customer's loyalty over time. We're proud of what this team has built and even more excited about what's ahead. With that, let me hand it to Kate to walk through our financials.

Thanks, Niraj, and good morning, everyone. Let's dive into our financial results for the second quarter. Revenue for Q2 grew by 7.5% year-over-year, with the U.S. up by 8.7% and our international segment down by 1.3%. This was another impressive quarter of share momentum from the U.S., buoyed by some macro improvement. However, that macro improvement did not extend to our end markets in Canada or the U.K., which both saw continued pressure on consumer sentiment and discretionary spending. Let me continue to walk down the P&L. As I do, please note that the remaining financials include depreciation and amortization, but exclude equity-based compensation, related taxes, and other adjustments. I will use the same basis when discussing our outlook as well. Gross margin for Q2 was 30.0% of net revenue.

As we discussed back in May, the investments we are making into programs like Wayfair Rewards and the customer experience continue to bear fruit in the form of accelerating order capture and sustained market share outperformance. In fact, we saw new order growth in Q2 accelerate for the fourth consecutive quarter and reach a post-COVID high. Customer service and merchant fees were 3.6% of net revenue, while advertising was 11.1%. Combined, we delivered a contribution margin of 15.3% for the second quarter. Selling, operations, technology, G&A expenses came in at $361 million. We've long articulated that as we return to consistent and expanding top-line growth, you would see us hold steady our fixed cost base, the evidence of that is right here. We've driven 100 basis points of SOT G&A leverage versus Q2 last year, which flows directly to EBITDA.

In total, we generated $242 million of EBITDA in the second quarter for a 6.9% margin on net revenue, the best margin figure we've delivered since 2021. We ended the quarter with $1.1 billion of cash and equivalents on our balance sheet and $1.6 billion of liquidity when including availability from our undrawn revolver. Cash from operations was $360 million, offset by $59 million in capital expenditures, for a total of $301 million of free cash flow. This was up by more than 30% year-over-year and the best quarter of cash generation we've had since the second quarter of 2020. On the capital structure front, we issued a $400 million high-yield note and used the proceeds to redeem the remainder of our 2028 convertible bonds. Our three-year journey to move away from convertible debt is nearly complete.

We have just $39 million of our 2026 bonds remaining and $229 million of our 2027 bonds. Our leverage profile has changed dramatically since we started down this path, and we received our first credit ratings upgrade this spring, a two-notch upgrade from Fitch, reflecting just how far our credit profile has improved in a short period of time. Investors have asked about our capital priorities as we look out to the future. I want to spend a couple of minutes walking through some thoughts here. 2026 has been an exciting year for our physical retail efforts, and 2027 promises to bring even more. We launched our Atlanta store in the spring, Columbus earlier in the summer, and have our Denver location opening this fall. Next year, you'll see us come to Westchester, Fort Lauderdale, Cincinnati, Princeton, and Pittsburgh as we further refine and hone our strategy.

While this is certainly an area of investment from a capital perspective, the build-outs on these stores take time, and the combined investment sits nicely in the range of low single-digit CapEx as a percentage of revenue, even when including our logistics network and capitalized labor costs. As we continue to build our way to double-digit adjusted EBITDA margins, we expect that our free cash flow generation will continue to expand meaningfully. Thus far, we've been able to use that free cash flow to offset a considerable amount of dilution through repurchasing our convertible bonds, and will now have the opportunity to shift to repurchasing our own shares outright. While we intend to be opportunistic around this, our next goal will be to more directly offset our stock-based compensation. We recognize that this is a real economic expense and treat it as such.

This ties into a topic that we haven't touched on in an earnings call in many years: earnings per share. Our GAAP net income has flipped back and forth between positive and negative in recent quarters, due in part to the accounting treatment on our convertible bond repurchases. As we've worked down the converts, we've been repurchasing bonds that, for the most part, have been trading in line with the converted equity value, well above par. When repurchased directly with cash, we book that difference as a loss on debt extinguishment. Now that we are largely finished repurchasing our convertible bonds, you'll see us move away from booking these losses.

This should structurally boost our GAAP net income and leave the biggest point of difference between our GAAP net income and our adjusted net income to be the stock-based compensation piece, which we have been steadily decreasing over time.

On a trailing 12-month basis, our stock-based compensation in the second quarter of 2026 is down approximately 40% from what it was two years ago. Ultimately, all the progress we're making to drive improvement in adjusted EBITDA and free cash flow will soon be reflected more holistically in net income as well. Let's now turn to guidance for the third quarter. Beginning with the top line, we would guide you to high-single-digit growth for Q3. We're excited to see our trajectory on share strength continue on the back of our wide array of growth initiatives and the strength of our core recipe. Turning to gross margin, we will continue to use a range of 29.5%-30.5% of net revenue.

We would expect to end up at the lower end of the guidance range for Q3 as we continue to invest in the customer experience, including in the loyalty program. This investment should be matched almost one-for-one by savings on the advertising line. To that end, customer service and merchant fees should be just below 4%, and advertising should be in a 10.5%-11.5% range, also at the low end. The net of this should be a contribution margin that is in line with or slightly better than what we just delivered in Q2. SOT G&A is expected to continue to hold in the $360 million-$370 million range. Working your way down the P&L, this guidance suggests a third quarter adjusted EBITDA margin in the 6%-7% of net revenue range. Let me touch on a few housekeeping items.

We expect equity-based compensation and related taxes of roughly $65 million-$75 million. Depreciation and amortization should be approximately $64 million-$70 million. It's worth noting that you've seen this come down to the range of 1%-2% of revenue over the past year, a reflection of falling CapEx in prior years, largely due to lower capitalized site and software development expense. We would expect it to stay in this range going forward. Net interest expense of approximately $42 million. Weighted average shares outstanding of approximately 137 million, which is up quarter-over-quarter due to the redemption of the 2028 notes. CapEx in a $60 million-$70 million range. I want to wrap up today by echoing Niraj's enthusiasm.

The momentum we're seeing across the business, from sustained share gains in our core U.S. market to outsized growth and luxury with Perigold, is clear evidence that our core recipe is working. On the financial side, our playbook remains disciplined. Capture top-line market share, hold our fixed cost base steady, and let that growth flow directly into expanding EBITDA margins and strong free cash flow. We are operating from a position of strength, expanding our competitive moats and driving durable, highly profitable growth, which can compound for the long term. With that, Niraj, Steve, and I are happy to take your questions.

We will now begin the question-and-answer session. Please limit yourself to one question and one follow-up. If you would like to ask a question, please press star one to raise your hand. To withdraw your question, press star one again. We ask that you pick up your handset when asking the question to allow for optimum sound quality. If you are muted locally, please remember to unmute your device. Please stand by while we compile the Q&A roster. Your first question comes from the line of Christopher Horvers with JPMorgan. Your line is open. Please go ahead.

Thanks, good morning, everybody. My first question is about actually tariff refunds and what you're seeing in the marketplace from a pricing perspective? They're starting to roll through traditional retail, and companies are booking gains, obviously, you don't participate in that because of the marketplace function. I'm curious, A, if you're seeing prices come down, and B, what's the sort of implication of how Wayfair possibly participates in that? You've been investing in customer experience. You've also been investing in take rate and shoulder periods. Does it relieve some of the pressure on the gross margin as prices potentially come down in the marketplace? Or maybe they're not coming down.

Thanks, Chris. Nice to hear from you. A few thoughts on tariff refunds. We have not seen tariff refunds affect prices in the marketplace; obviously, it's sort of a one-time sort of working capital benefit companies will get. I think folks are doing different things with that. To be honest, what we're seeing in our supplier base is that there's been a lot of last few years have been challenging for them, there's a lot of interest, and they've been trying to drive new product development. This gives them capital to bring in more new product and to go deeper on inventory. Competitively, we have not seen much change with pricing either. Our pricing competitiveness

Has gotten very good over the recent past it continues to stay there. We haven't seen any changes in shift from competitors, meaning that they're reacting to the tariff refunds they may be getting. I really don't think there's going to be much in implications from this.

Chris, I'd just add that when the tariffs started a year ago, we said we actually didn't see rising prices then. I think it tracks that we're not going to see a sort of reinvestment in lowering prices for consumers now. The benefit of the marketplace is that if we were able to hold things strong for consumers, that continues.

Understood. There's been a lot of focus on your gross margin outlook over the past couple of quarters. I thought it was interesting that you noted that your advertising rate guide was expected to be towards the lower end of the range. Can we think about that? Is this simply a function of what you're guiding at high single digit, obviously, you're lapping a really tough comp in July, things have to be pretty good? Is it just that the revenue growth and the fish are biting and you don't have to spend? Or how much of it is that all the investments you're making around customer retention, including loyalty, are actually working out and sort of there's this balance of the cost of customer acquisition between the gross margin line and the advertising line?

I think you're hitting on it with the latter part of what you said. If you take a step back, here's the way I think about it. What you're seeing in our business, we've been talking about this for a number of quarters now, and in fact, in the shareholder letter that we released at the beginning of this year, we talked about how we thought our organic growth rate could climb over time to be over 20% a year. We basically tried to explain that this was going to be something that we could create regardless of the macro, just through our own actions. The way to think about that is like, you know, beginning at 25%, we were at 0%. What's the track to get to 5%, to 10%, to 15%, to 20%?

We obviously got to 5%, now Kate just guided to high single digits. If we go from 5%, we get to 10%, we get to 15%, we get to 20%. The answer is we're doing that through our own actions. The recipe sort of is what we got back in place post-COVID a couple of years ago now, which is price, selection, speed, availability. Those things continue to improve. More recently, we were able to start launching new programs, this is sort of as we got through all the organizational restructuring we needed to do, we started getting some tech cycles back from the re-platforming. We were able to start launching programs. Think of Wayfair Verified, think of Wayfair Rewards, the loyalty program. Think of Stores, think of Wayfair Delivery Plus.

As those things are playing out, these are programs that they start, but then they compound over time. Right? The third bucket is basically as you get further through the technology platform, you get even more technology cycles back. Now you start thinking about feature function on the site and the way we've always used technology investment to drive the business. You now have that, and what you can do on the customer experience, we can do on the supplier experience. The trajectory we're on is that you're going to see accelerating revenue growth, and you're going to see that in the form that you see our share spread widening. A lot of the things that we're investing in compound and play out over time. You're not even getting the benefit of all of them today.

As that plays out, that's why the growth rate continues to accelerate. The way we're managing it is to optimize the EBITDA dollars. If you think about a discounted cash flow model, ultimately, you care about the dollars. When do you get how many dollars based on what you're doing, right? You discount them back. How do you get more dollars? You can work margin rate up, or you can grow the amount of total dollars that you apply that margin rate against. What we care about are the amount of dollars we're going to get in the future. We don't worry about a super short-term period view on one or the other, a mid-term view on one or the other, or a long-term view. How are we going to create the most total dollars over time?

What you're seeing is that we're expanding. The total dollars are growing nicely; as this plays out, you're going to see those total dollars grow at a very nice rate. That's going to be due to what I just described. The recipe, the programs, the use of technology.

Your next question comes from the line of Peter Keith with Piper Sandler. Your line is open. Please go ahead.

Thank you. Good morning, and nice results. Niraj or Kate, maybe just a follow-up on the last points you were making. The Q3 guide of high single digits is above the historic mid-single-digit guide. Could you unpack that a little bit of what you're seeing near term? Do you think the industry is getting better? Is it that your share gains are accelerating? If it is share gains, are there specific programs you think are really starting to pop for you?

Yeah. When you say historic, I think you're just going back a handful of quarters, but that's fine. What I would say is that what we're seeing is that our business is accelerating due to our own actions, due to what I described: the recipe, the programs, the use of technology. We have a pretty good roadmap and line of sight on how that's going to continue to happen. Where we are now is growing at the high single-digit rate, which is obviously what Kate said. Let me turn it over to Kate for any thoughts she wants.

I think what you're hearing is our ongoing share capture story. That's been building for some time, and we've spoken about that continuing to accelerate throughout the year. That guide does not contemplate a change in the macro. I think we've described at various points, and others have described sort of flattish bouncing along the bottom. We're not assuming macro momentum there, but we do expect our various initiatives, the core recipe, the loyalty, and Verified, and Stores, and storefront experience changes, all of those things really combine and help to continue to build that healthy revenue comp.

Okay. That's helpful. One of the initiatives I think is intriguing is on the store growth as you're accelerating those openings. Stores, in theory, should become a greater percentage of total revenue over time. One question we're getting from investors is on the margin profile of store-driven revenue. Could you talk about that margin on store revenue versus the more traditional e-com revenue? Is it in line? Is it a little bit lower? How does that compare?

Yeah. I'll just say one high-level thought and then turn it over to Kate to answer your question. We're very excited about what we're seeing in stores, and that's not just revenue growth, but also how our profit will be driven over time. Also, the impact it can have on customers, on customer profile, customer loyalty, customer behavior, because obviously we have a very strong online presence that lets you achieve a set of things with the massive selection, the fast delivery. Obviously, it's purely online. That doesn't mean you're not able to touch it, feel it, whatever. If you couple that now with having a store, now a customer can go either way for any purchase they want, any experience they want. We're seeing very nice behaviors from that too. We think the impact we're seeing is very large.

The high-level point I want to make before I turn it over to Kate is that we're investing in things that we think are going to be very strong for the durable growth of the business, and that's not just revenue growth, that's profit growth. Again, if you think about what I said about maximizing the profit dollars, and we talk about EBITDA, but we think about it also as owners' earnings, which basically then would account for the CapEx. It accounts for SBC. That's really what we're looking to optimize. You're going to see that the things we're doing are really adding up and, frankly, a lot of things we're investing in today, the gains are going to come in the future. That's part of why you see acceleration or why we talk about acceleration ahead of us.

Yes. It's a great question. Obviously, you're hearing us speak more frequently about stores. I'll walk through a little bit of how we look at it. I do want to acknowledge that we recognize that at some point we'll go deeper into sort of the stores and the store economics once we have a bit more data. Right now, we have three stores open and one that's been open for longer than a year. They're all doing great, but we want to get a little bit more track record there, and then we'll go into some deeper explanations. That said, let me just sort of walk through a bit high level. The stores and the e-com site: stores sell our products at the same prices as online. I think we've talked about that before.

You may get a little bit of shipping difference, but generally, you can think about them as similar growth margin. As you move through the P&L, that's where you have a little bit of difference in where things show up. For example, stores, obviously, as you might expect, would carry a much lower ACNR than e-com. On the other hand, store labor, which we don't have an e-com piece, then shows up in the SOTG&A. Overall, it's very healthy margins, and we feel really good about that investment. That's why you hear these three stores in 2026, and we've now, at this point as of yesterday, announced five leases for 2027. We're clearly seeing the benefit here. What Niraj spoke to in terms of building and investing for the long term, I think that's the most exciting piece, right?

We're unlocking market share growth with these stores. We continue to see more than 50% of the customers in these stores are new to the customer file, we're able to really expand our share and take a more significant share of that TAM with the stores. That overall story then helps us accelerate EBITDA and improve that EBITDA margin. The last thing I will say, because it comes up quite a bit and I think it's a little bit unique to how we operate stores, is that the stores themselves, when you think about our capital investment for them, it's the physical build-out of the store. It is not the inventory. The inventory in the stores is still owned by our suppliers. Think about it as another distribution point.

All right. That's great. Thank you so much.

Your next question comes from the line of Simeon Gutman with Morgan Stanley. Your line is open. Please go ahead.

Hey, good morning, everyone. I want to ask about the step change from the current EBITDA margin range to some of the long-term targets. Realized sales are good now, even though the macro's not helping. Can we talk about, I guess, the realization of that path? Does it take just a stronger sales environment? Do you think it's some additional leverage on the SOT G&A line? I'll leave it at that.

Okay, great. Thanks, Simeon, for the question. Let me give you some thoughts, then I think I'll turn it over to Kate to provide more detail. I think if you think about it, there's a few moving parts in how we get from where we are today to moving nicely into the double digits. There's a few different pieces, and they play out over different time frames.

From where we sit today, one thing that would definitely play out over time as we grow sales is that there's a lot of, through volume, there's benefits we get on certain fixed costs that get levered. When you think about SOT G&A, you can think of corporate staff as one of those things. Frankly, in the gross margin piece, there's also things that we get around economics on products, basically due to supply chain efficiencies. Supply chain efficiencies, you can think about: we sell these large, bulky items. They're generally made halfway around the world, and we operate a large logistics network to facilitate that for speed of delivery, reduction of damage, and lower costs. A large network like that always benefits from more volume, and the fixed-cost leverage there can be meaningful over time.

That is one thing I want to make sure you don't lose track of, and that will play out as volumes grow. There is a lot of interplay in terms of how ad cost plays into the business, and obviously loyalty is one thing that is going to change in how gross margin ad costs play out. Fundamentally, stores is going to be another thing, and I mentioned when you get into a geography, the impact you have on customers. Frankly, ad cost is something that we have opportunity to get leverage on over time as well, which could be quite meaningful.

On SOT G&A, there is, of course, how it levers with the fixed, just as a dollar amount against higher sales. Frankly, there is also how AI is playing into things, and that is something that we are very excited about, and that will play out over time. Basically, there is all these different moving pieces. They play out over different time frames. The way we are kind of tying it together is that thinking about the dollars we are creating, the profit dollars, and we are optimizing to grow those over time. Let me turn it over to Kate.

I think Niraj actually hit on much of it, but let me provide a little bit more color. The first thing I would say is we are very confident about the path to 10%, but we know we can go beyond 10%. I think that is an important piece to put in here, is that we are driving to well north of 10%. We said that several years ago at the Investor Day. That continues to be the path here. You have obviously seen, I think maybe Niraj said, the timing of things has hit a little bit differently than how we maybe described it a few years ago, the last time we updated the EBITDA bridge. You have seen that SOT G&A leverage hit, and we expect that to continue to grow.

We have talked for quite some time about being able to hold in the fixed-cost base component of that even as the top line accelerates. I would expect in the nearer term to continue to see nice leverage there. Niraj mentioned there are other areas where we get leverage as we scale: gross margin on some of the logistics pieces, AC&R on ad cost leverage, et cetera. These pieces that we all talked about or that we talked about several years ago, they are all still there. I would say it is sort of the timing and the cadence that has shifted a bit.

Yeah, maybe the follow-up is you seem like you're controlling the tempo of both share gain and margin well. You've talked about that for a long time, and I think the market has struggled to understand how you press the buttons. I guess, getting to a higher margin level and then covering the equity comp, the stock comp, I guess that's a choice that you can make now if and when, or meaning you got to get a couple points of higher margin, but it feels like you could do that, but you may grow a little less. Can you just talk about those trade-offs and then when you get to that positive GAAP earnings?

Yes, I'll turn it over to Kate because I think there's a few things there. Again, if you think about what we're talking about, how we're maximizing the profit growth over time, there's a few moving parts on that. It's not so much a profit growth trade-off, it's sort of how these initiatives play through over time. Like they're moving ahead, and they're compounding. It's important to think that today what we're spending money on, it's both growing the share spread today, but it's also the things that accelerate the growth towards the 15% and then the 20%+ growth. You're getting the dollars that come off of that. Both things are in flight, so I wouldn't put them in tension as much as the way you're thinking about it.

There's also some things around how the net income gets calculated that I think.

Simeon, I think you're asking a great question. We're obviously focused on GAAP net income. That's why, for the first time in quite some time, I actually spoke about that on the call. I do want to point out one sort of complexity in the GAAP net income flipping between positive and negative has been the settlement of these converts. When you extinguish the debt with cash, if it's trading above, then that's a loss, right? That shows up in the GAAP net income. Now that we're largely through that, we expect that to sort of resolve going forward. The primary difference, then, between adjusted net income and GAAP net income does become the stock-based compensation, and we do think about that as a real expense. We've moved that down 40% from where it was two years ago.

I mentioned on the call, we've started to think about how do we move into sort of buying that back and offsetting that piece so you don't have the dilution ongoing from it. I think we're quite focused on that.

Your next question comes from the line of Eric Sheridan with Goldman Sachs. Your line is open. Please go ahead.

Thanks so much for taking the question. Maybe two, if I could. First, building on the comments from the previous answers. When you look out to Q3 and the way you're building your revenue guide, is that an extension of some of the skew you saw in the business between U.S. versus international or high end of the market versus non-high end of the market sustaining into Q3? Or are there any changes in the assumptions around those skews? That'd be number one. Number two would be in the non-luxury part of the market: how are you thinking about incenting behavior and leaning into promotions as an element of maybe improving some of the way in which consumers are acting and away from the higher end of the category? Thanks so much.

All right. Thanks, Eric. Yeah, today we talked a fair amount about Perigold, and we touched on how Perigold and our specialty retail brands are growing. It's obviously important not to lose sight that the vast majority of our revenue is still mass, right? The Wayfair business is a very large business, so we have exposure to all the segments. What I would say is that ultimately, when we talk about the business accelerating, the mass business needs to accelerate. Otherwise, the total business couldn't accelerate. It'd be very hard for the other pieces to carry the mass business if it wasn't performing. So we're seeing that we can, through our own actions, have momentum in all the segments, regardless of what sort of the macro is doing in those segments.

Obviously, we're guiding Q3, and here we are almost halfway into it. So we're seeing the mix of what's happening. We haven't seen the K-shape economy collapse. At the same time, we're seeing that we're taking really nice momentum. We have a really nice momentum in mass, but we're definitely doing very well in Specialty and Luxury. On the U.S. international, the biggest thing to point out on international, we're very bullish on international. It's just the reality on international is that when I talk about the recipe, I talk about our programs, then I talk about how we're using technology. We aren't able to do everything in every geography all at the same exact time.

For example, the loyalty program, which rolled out in the U.S. 18 months ago, only rolled out in some of the international geographies a few months ago. It's just because we have to sequence how we do things, both from a business operations standpoint and from a technology deployment standpoint. A lot of the things that we're using to drive the U.S. business, they're playing out in the international markets, but there's a time delay, if you will, from the reality of when you can allocate resources to them. We, of course, account for that and how the guide would give you, but the business directionally, sequentially, we're seeing everything tracking in the direction we'd like. On your last piece around promotions, I would say it's been multiple years now; it's been a very promotional environment.

I wouldn't say that anything is starkly changing about promotions. It's just been a promotional environment at mass because the category's out of favor. You'VE got to get the customer's attention, get them curious, and promotions help do that. What I would say, the only thing that's maybe changed about promotions is both from a technology standpoint, we've been able to add some feature functions of giving our suppliers new levers of how they can participate and things they can do on promotions, giving the customer new experiences. Frankly, we just continue to also optimize our calendar. We keep learning every year about trying different things and figuring out what the more optimal calendar is for this environment. At a high level, it's been a promotional environment. Don't think of it as not now it is or anything like that.

Your next question comes from the line of Michael Lasser with UBS. Your line is open. Please go ahead.

Good morning. Thank you so much for taking my question. How did the unit economics of your customers compare today versus five and 10 years ago, especially as you've created more stickiness through the loyalty program and more touch points through the physical manifestation of your stores?

Michael, that's a great question. In fact, I think that gets a little bit as how you can think about where we're headed when you think about the future. Both of the things you mentioned, stores and the loyalty program, are both relatively new, right? Stores, the store in Wilmette, the first large-format Wayfair store, opened at the end of May two years ago. That's just a little over two years old. The loyalty program launched in the fall of that year, right? That's, say, a year and a half old. Both of those are having a very positive, dramatically positive effect on customers' behavior.

They're both early in ramping when you think about the fact that we operate nationally all over the U.S., or you think about the sheer number of customers we have; only a portion of them are in the loyalty program so far. We continue to add benefits to the loyalty program and add ways that customers can discover their benefits and way customers can learn about the program. I think there's a little bit of how our unit economics compare to five or 10 years ago. What I think is more interesting is how our unit economics will compare to where they will be in time, the effects from these programs, and there's other programs in addition to the two that you mentioned, they're early. The compounding benefits, we see them happening.

It gets more exciting as, for example, for stores. We have one in the northern suburbs of Chicago. We have one in Midtown on the West Side in Atlanta, and we just opened one north of Columbus. We have three. If you think about the expanse of the U.S., you think about how many locations there are that you could have a store and impact the behavior. We're in three of those small trade areas relative to the large number that exist in the U.S. That's kind of just the point about how it's early.

Understood. Thank you so much. My follow-up question is on the arc of Wayfair's market share gains over time. You're guiding to a high single-digit increase in revenue in the third quarter. Is it your expectation that from here, the build is just going to simply be sequential, like you'll get to that double-digit increase versus the market by the fourth quarter, and then moving into 2027, that the momentum can build on top of that?

What I would say that, I think here's the important way to think about it. Sequentially, it is going to be what I said, right? Where we're at 0%, we'll get to 5%, we'll get to 10%, we'll get to 15%, we'll get to 20%. We've been careful not to try to give you guidance down to exact quarters, partially because the way we do this is not one lever. It's the combination of these things we're working on. To guess like exactly what can happen when you're trying to now nail it down to weeks and months, that's just false precision, right? We see directionally that it's happening. Think about the 0% got to 5%. Everyone got comfortable that we're at 5%. I think we covered before is like our historic rate of guiding was mid-single-digit, right?

Which is, if you think about it hasn't been for that long, but everyone got comfortable with that. Kate said high single digits. What we're basically saying is like the business has gotten things going past that level. We expect, as we told you, that that will climb: the 10% will climb to 15%, will climb to 20%, but that's going to play out over time. I'd also be careful to say that we're not giving you guidance for Q4 or Q1. What we're saying is that we're actually directionally very excited by what we're seeing. To be honest, a lot of these initiatives, again, not to repeat it, but they're early. I think it's important to internalize that because when you internalize that, you can see how our ability to see what's going to happen can be reasonably strong.

Yeah. I wouldn't be doing my job if I didn't remind everybody that we've only guided to the third quarter. Clearly we feel quite good about the momentum that we're seeing. As we came out several quarters ago and started talking about what we expected to be the compounding effects of these initiatives, you've now seen several quarters of that panning out. We remain, I think, high degree of conviction in our ability to continue to grow share over time. That's really the result of these initiatives hitting and sort of playing off of each other.

The last point I would make on this is we went public in 2014, and at that time, we had roughly $1 billion in annual sales. In 2019, the year before COVID, we'd gotten up to roughly $9 billion in annual sales. COVID, the shape of COVID, the boom-bust of COVID, some of the mess created by COVID. There's a multi-year period in there that gets messy. What we've been trying to talk about in the last couple of years is how we've gotten back on track for nice growth. We're a company that has always used technology programs and customer-facing initiatives and the way we work with suppliers to take share in a category that's very, very large. Hundreds and hundreds of billions of dollars and very, very fragmented.

If you think about that and you say, "Oh, well, you're bigger now. You're $12.5 billion-ish last year. How can you grow at this rate?" Well, I'm sure if you want to just think about that as a dollar number, you could say that seems big. If you turn it into a percentage of the market, it doesn't seem particularly large because if you're like, "Oh, you could pick whatever number you want, 2%, 3% of the market." You pick your number. Say you're 3% of the market, and you say, "Oh, well, how can you grow at high rates?" Well, it's not very high if you start thinking about what the 3% grows to, if you're growing at these types of growth rates we're talking about. When you get to 4%, what does 4% grow to?

We think we have a lot of room, particularly when you think about the initiatives we talked about. I made a point about how early we are in stores. Another point I would make is just on technology. Doing the re-platforming for multiple years, that basically inhibited our ability to have product-led growth, and we're now back to having product-led growth. There's significant changes about where we are today than where we were a few years ago, and significant opportunities that are in front of us that we can point to that are early that we're seeing very good momentum from. This is kind of how it will play out.

Your next question comes from the line of Michael McGovern with Bank of America. Your line is open. Please go ahead.

Hey, thanks for taking my question. Can you speak to the higher oil and freight shipping costs this year, and just how you've been able to manage that so effectively? Are suppliers still hesitant to pass through costs? Have you been able to use your own take rate to cover your own higher transport costs? Thank you.

Yeah. Basically, there's always moving parts in the business, right? It's the reality. I would say that what we've seen, suppliers have had a challenging environment for multiple years. They want to lean in and protect their business, grow their business in what's a difficult, challenging environment. They know that they need to figure out how to be nimble, and also how to be competitive. They're obviously the ones carrying the inventory. They're the ones deciding what costs will then ultimately manifest to what retail costs on the platform, because their wholesale cost plus the cost we add, our margin, the shipping costs, outbound shipping, whatever, create the retail price. It's a marketplace. They're competing against the other suppliers for that customer. The dynamic is such that they try to bring in inventory when costs are a little lower.

They might not bring in more speculative inventory if the prices are a little higher, but they'll move thinner on margin for a period of time to protect the retail if they think the prices might come back down on a variable cost they have. There's a lot of dynamics, and this is part of the benefit of our operating model.

Yeah, I was actually just going to add that I think that this is where you see the benefits of both the marketplace and our scale. That helps to insulate, at the end of the day, our customers from some of the movement here.

Got it. Thank you. Just a quick follow-up on Perigold. Is that a higher unit economic transaction throughout the entire P&L? What does the customer acquisition cost online look like for that higher-income customer? How much does the physical store help with that customer acquisition cost long term?

Yeah. What I'd say about Perigold, as you go more premium, you typically see not just AOV rise, but you see the margin rise. It's a narrower business opportunity. It's a smaller piece of the market. We participate kind of across the spectrum. Actually being in all those segments actually gives us a lot of benefit of what we can do to serve any individual customer, what we can do for the B2B customer, et cetera. In terms of specifics around margin, let me turn it over to Kate.

Wayfair (W) Q2 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

Company Participants