The companies on the Global 500 employ 70.2 million people, and their revenue represents more than one-third of the world’s GDP.

Fortune Global 500

With a combined revenue of $21 trillion and $2.1 trillion in profits, the 2026 Fortune 500 is the definitive list of America's largest companies.

Fortune 500

The 300 companies on this year’s list brought in over $12.5 trillion in revenue for the latest 12 months, with the median revenue figure at $24 billion.

America's Most Innovative Companies

AI is a major force shaping this year’s list—but it’s far from the only story.

World's Most Admired Companies

The corporations on our annual list of the world's 500 largest companies combined to generate $41.7 trillion in revenue over the past year.

Almost $20 trillion in revenue—and a record-breaking $1.87 trillion in profits. Introducing the 2025 Fortune 500, the definitive list of the biggest companies in America.

The 300 companies on this year’s list brought in over $12.6 trillion in revenue for the latest 12 months, with the median revenue figure at $22 billion.

Leaders in all industries rely more than ever on Big Tech—and appreciate the giants that deliver, at scale, without drama.

The corporations on our annual list posted aggregate revenues of $41 trillion for the second year in a row.

Industries included in the sector are banks, insurance, and real estate companies.

Fortune Sector Leaders: Financials

The Fortune 500, in its 70th year in 2024, ranks the biggest U.S. companies by revenue.

The 200 companies on this list are transforming industries from the inside out.

The 26th edition of the list shows how much esteem Big Tech giants command among other business leaders.

The 25th Fortune World’s Most Admired Companies list suggests that tech giants’ peers respect them as much as ever.

The 300 companies on this list are transforming industries from the inside out.

The Fortune 500, in its 69th year in 2023, ranks the biggest U.S. companies by revenue.

Just as it dominates our economy, Big Tech now dominates Fortune’s annual ranking of corporate reputation.

This year’s Fortune 500 marks the 68th running of the list.

After a year in which humanity leaned more heavily than ever on tech giants, see which companies topped Fortune's ranking of corporate reputation.

Total revenue for the world’s biggest companies fell 4.8% to $31.7 trillion this year—the first decline in half a decade.

The fifth-largest banking institution in the United States by assets, it is the parent company of U.S. Bank and known for its extensive list of branch locations.

This year’s Fortune 500 marks the 67th running of the list.

F500-2021-113-U.S. Bancorp

For an astounding 13th straight year, Apple claims the top spot in Fortune’s annual ranking of corporate reputation, based on a survey of almost 3,800 executives, directors, and analysts.

This year's Fortune Global 500 generated $33.3 trillion in revenues and $2.1 trillion in profits.

G500-2020-466-US Bancorp

The bank holding company is the parent of U.S. Bank, which had $495 billion in assets as of Dec. 31, 2019.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 66th running of the list.

F500-2020-113-US-Bancorp

Here are the World's Most Admired Companies for 2019 as ranked in their industries. See who made the list.

This year's Fortune Global 500 generated $27.7 trillion in revenues and $1.5 trillion in profits.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 65th running of the list.

Here are the World's Most Admired Companies for 2018 as ranked in their industries. See who made the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 64th running of the list.

Here are the World's Most Admired Companies for 2017 as ranked in their industries. See who made the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 63rd running of the list.

Here are the World's Most Admired Companies for 2016 as ranked in their industries. See who made the list.

This year's Fortune Global 500 generated $27.6 trillion in revenues and $1.5 trillion in profits.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 62nd running of the list.

Business insiders have spoken: Asked which companies they most admire, more than 4,100 executives, directors, and analysts chose these top 50 All-Stars.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 61st running of the list. Wal-Mart claims the top spot again. See who made the list.

Wal-Mart stayed on top as its sales crept closer to half-a-trillion dollars. Apple moved into the top five. And UnitedHealth Group continued its steady climb. 

Sector

Industry

Current All-Star Rank

Previous All-Star Rank

Industry Rank

Previous Industry Rank

Overall Score

Innovation

People Management

Use of Corporate Assets

Social Responsibility

Quality of Management

Financial Soundness

Long-Term Investment Value

Quality of Products/Services

Global Competitiveness

Strongest Dimension

Years on list

Previous rank

State

Key Financials (last Fiscal Year)

Revenues ($M)

Profits ($M)

Assets ($M)

Total Stockholder Equity ($M)

Profit Ratios

Profit as % of Revenues

Profits as % of Assets

Profits as % of Stockholder Equity

Earnings Per Share (last Fiscal Year)

Earnings Per Share ($)

EPS % Change (from prior fiscal year)

EPS % Change (5 year annual rate)

EPS % Change (10 year annual rate)

Total Return

Total Return to Investors (last year)

Total Return to Investors (5 year, annualized)

Total Return to Investors (10 year, annualized)

"Founded in 1863, U.S. Bancorp is a comprehensive financial services holding company operating in the United States. The company’s operations are divided into several key segments: wealth, corporate, commercial and institutional banking, consumer and business banking, payment services, and treasury and corporate support. 
U.S. Bancorp offers depository services including checking accounts, savings accounts, and time certificate contracts; as well as lending services including traditional credit products, credit card services, lease financing, import/export trade, asset-backed lending, and agricultural finance. U.S. Bancorp’s corporate and institutional services include capital markets, treasury management, and receivable lockbox collection services. In addition, the company offers asset management and fiduciary services for individuals, estates, foundations, business corporations, and charitable organizations. 
The company extends its portfolio with investment and insurance products, primarily within its domestic markets. It also provides fund administration services to mutual and other funds. Corporate and purchasing card services, as well as corporate trust services, are part of U.S. Bancorp’s extensive offerings."

Q2 2026

Q1 2026

Q4 2025

Q3 2025

Q2 2025

Q1 2025

Q4 2024

U.S. Bancorp (USB): Company Profile, Stock Price, News, Rankings

legacy

U.S. Bancorp

u.s. bancorp

Welcome to the U.S. Bancorp third quarter 2025 earnings conference call. Following a review of the results, there will be a formal question and answer session. If you would like to ask a question during this time, please press star, then one on your phone. If you wish to withdraw your question, please press star, then one again. This call will be recorded and available for replay beginning today at approximately 11:00 A.M. Central Time. I'll now turn the conference over to George Andersen, Director of Investor Relations for U.S. Bancorp.

Thank you, Jean-Louis, and good morning, everyone. Joining me today in Minneapolis is our Chief Executive Officer, Gunjan Kedia, and Vice Chair and CFO, John Stern. In a moment, Gunjan and John will reference a slide presentation together with their prepared remarks. A copy of the presentation, our press release, and all supplemental consolidated schedules are available on our website at ir.usbank.com. Please note that any forward-looking statements made during today's call are subject to risks and uncertainties that can cause our actual results to differ materially from our current expectations. These factors are described on page two of today's earnings presentation, in our press release, and in reports filed with the SEC. Following our prepared remarks, Gunjan and John will be happy to answer your questions. I will now turn the call over to Gunjan.

Thank you, George, and good morning, everyone. If I could please turn your attention to slide three. In the third quarter, we reported earnings per share of $1.22, an increase of 18.4% year over year. Our net revenue of $7.3 billion was a quarterly record, reflecting both strong momentum across our fee businesses and improved spread income. This quarter, we generated a very meaningful 530 basis points of positive operating leverage, a return on average assets of 1.17%, and a net interest margin of 2.75%. John will provide more details on our financial performance in his opening remarks. Importantly, we are making strong progress against each of our three strategic priorities for our company. We are generating organic growth through distinctive interconnected solutions. We are maintaining our expense discipline through sustainable process automation, and we are executing on our payments transformation with greater focus and strategic investments.

As we manage the bank for the long run through both positive and uncertain times, our highly diversified balance sheet and foundational risk management capabilities delivered improved credit quality and stronger capital and liquidity levels this quarter. Moving to slide four, fee income diversification is a key source of strength for the company. On the left, you will see that fee revenue grew at 9.5% on a year-over-year basis, reflecting broad-based strength across our payments, institutional, and consumer businesses. Notably, interest rate movements this quarter supported a meaningful acceleration in select capital markets and mortgage revenues. On the right, we highlight five key businesses that have demonstrated strong year-over-year growth and that we believe present a favorable growth outlook. Collectively, these businesses represented approximately two-thirds of our total fee revenue this quarter. Turning to slide five, we spotlight one additional business, Impact Finance.

With the Union Bank acquisition, we bolstered our platform, bringing improved tax credit syndication capabilities, new talent, and increased access to the California market. Currently reported within the other revenue, Impact Finance has grown at a 17% CAGR from 2021 to 2024 and is an important mission-driven capability that is core to our fee income portfolio. Over the next several years, we anticipate additional growth from a pull forward of activity tied to some recent executive orders and expect revenue trends across our environmental finance, affordable housing, and community finance solutions to remain robust. In addition, the business also supports a net tax benefit to the company, which we believe will continue to be a meaningful driver of bottom-line EPS growth. Slide six showcases our growing consumer franchise and long-term deposit strategy. Our deposit base is highly diversified across clients, geographies, and products, providing strength and stability through the cycle.

We are actively working to increase our share of consumer deposits with interconnected products like Bank Smartly, branch and client center expansions, partnerships, and enhanced marketing and analytical capabilities. Consumer deposits now represent over 52% of total average deposits, up nearly two points from the third quarter of 2023. Moving to slide seven, our expense discipline over the last two years and execution on four signature productivity programs has resulted in improved organic growth and greater operational efficiencies. As you can see on the left, the outcomes of our efforts have been quite successful, as we have seen steady improvement to both the efficiency ratio and positive operating leverage as adjusted. Turning to slide eight, our payments transformation remains a key strategic priority for our company.

As the charts on the left show, we have seen steady improvement and more consistent year-over-year fee growth over the last several quarters across both our traditional card issuing and merchant acquiring businesses. We are looking forward to providing a deeper dive into our payments transformation and strategy at an upcoming industry conference in the fall. Let me now turn the call over to John.

Thank you, Gunjan, and good morning, everyone. This was a very strong quarter for us, highlighted by core underlying business momentum and accelerating growth as we made meaningful progress toward our medium-term financial targets. If you turn to slide nine, I'll start with highlights for the quarter, followed by a discussion of third quarter earnings trends. As Gunjan mentioned, we reported earnings per common share of $1.22 and achieved record net revenue of $7.3 billion this quarter. Revenue growth versus prior periods benefited from improved spread income, driven by enhancements we've made to our portfolio mix, as well as broad-based fee growth as we deepened client relationships across the franchise. Elevated deposit flows at the end of the quarter in support of more robust client activity and seasonality in our corporate trust business resulted in ending assets of $695 billion.

As expected, nearly all key credit quality metrics, including non-performing assets and net charge-offs, improved both sequentially and on a year-over-year basis. As of September 30, our tangible book value per share increased 12.7% on a year-over-year basis. Slide 10 provides key performance metrics. As the slide illustrates, each of our key profitability and efficiency ratios improved this quarter, highlighted by a return on average assets of 1.17% and a return on tangible common equity of 18.6%. Over the last two years, we have increased our tangible common equity approximately 30% while continuing to deliver a high-teens ROTCE on steadily improving earnings growth. Notably, we also delivered an improved efficiency ratio of 57.2% and a net interest margin of 2.75% this quarter.

Our sequential margin expansion of nine basis points was driven by fixed asset repricing, strong card and commercial loan growth, as well as strategic balance sheet actions we took in the second quarter. We continue to expect net interest margin expansion in the medium term. Slide 11 provides a balance sheet summary. Total average deposits increased 1.8% linked quarter to $512 billion as we continued to emphasize growth in relationship-based deposits. Our percentage of non-interest bearing to total deposits remained stable at approximately 16%. Average loans totaled $379 billion, up 0.2% from the prior quarter. Adjusting for loan sales last quarter, our underlying growth rate was 1.0% linked quarter and 2.8% on a year-over-year basis. Loan yields increased to 5.97%, an eight basis point improvement linked quarter.

As we continue to strategically remix our balance sheet with a greater proportion of commercial and credit card loan balances, we increased both commercial and credit card loans 9.5% and 4.3% respectively on a year-over-year basis. Given the current industry focus on non-depository financial institutional lending, we included a slide in the appendix of our presentation to provide additional transparency on this loan category. As you will observe, this is a highly diversified portfolio with a balanced and broad composition of borrowers that is underpinned by our proven underwriting capabilities and strong collateral and structural protections. Finally, as it relates to the balance sheet, the ending balance in our investment portfolio as of September 30, 2023 was $171 billion and had an average yield of 3.26%, an eight basis point improvement sequentially, driven by the strategic actions we took last quarter and fixed asset repricing.

Turning to slide 12, net interest income on a fully taxable equivalent basis totaled $4.25 billion, an increase of 4.2% on a linked quarter basis. Slide 13 highlights trends in non-interest income. Total non-interest income was approximately $3.08 billion. Excluding security losses, total fee revenue increased 9.5% on a year-over-year basis, driven by new business momentum and broad-based growth across our fee businesses. Turning to slide 14, non-interest expense totaled approximately $4.2 billion as we continued to prudently manage our expense base. Slide 15 highlights our improving credit quality performance despite ongoing macroeconomic uncertainty. Our ratio of non-performing assets to loans and other real estate was 0.43% at September 30, 2023, an improvement of one basis point linked quarter and six basis points year over year. This quarter, our net charge-off ratio of 0.56% improved three basis points sequentially and four basis points year over year.

Turning to slide 16, as of September 30, 2023, our common equity tier 1 capital as a percentage of risk-weighted assets was 10.9%, a 20 basis point increase linked quarter. Including AOCI, our CET1 ratio improved to 9.2%. At the top of slide 17, we provide a comparison of third quarter results to our previous guidance. This quarter, both net interest income and fee revenues exceeded our expectations, while non-interest expense was in line with previous guidance, which drove meaningful positive operating leverage for the quarter. Let me now provide our forward-looking guidance. In the fourth quarter, we expect net interest income on a fully taxable equivalent basis to be relatively stable to our third quarter level of $4.25 billion. Total fee revenue is expected to be approximately $3 billion. Total non-interest expense is expected to increase between 1% and 1.5% sequentially.

We expect to deliver positive operating leverage of 200 basis points or more on an adjusted basis. Turning to slide 18, we are now operating within all of our medium-term target ranges, one year removed from our 2024 Investor Day, and remain confident in our ability to build on these results over time. Let me now hand it back to Gunjan for closing remarks.

Thank you, John. Third quarter results show that we are beginning to hit our stride on execution. We remain focused on delivering growth, productivity, returns, and strong risk management, both in favorable and uncertain economic environments. Let me just close by extending my deep gratitude to our clients and shareholders. Our results reflect the power of our strategy, the strength of our franchise, and the dedication of our teams across this organization. We appreciate your trust and your partnership. With that, we will now open the call for your questions.

At this time, as a reminder, if you would like to ask a question, press star, then the number one on your telephone keypad. We'll pause for just a moment to compile the Q&A order. Your first question comes from the line of John McDonald of Truist Securities. Your line is open.

Hi, good morning. I'll start off with a question for John, just on the outlook. John, what are you seeing for net interest margin trend in the fourth quarter? Can you give us some puts and takes on your outlook for net interest income to be relatively flattish in the fourth quarter?

Sure. Good morning, John. Maybe stepping back just to the third quarter, we had a lot of favorable items this quarter that will continue to be sustainable. We had strong fixed asset repricing. We had a healthy mix of favorability, both on the loan side of the equation as well as on the liability side. Of course, we had the strategic actions that we talked about last quarter that ended up being favorable as well. Looking forward, if I think about the fourth quarter, we talked about relative stability, and we have the favorable items still being a tailwind in terms of repricing and mix. However, we have credit card favorability this quarter that is seasonal to a certain extent, and that will reverse in some capacity. When I think about the quarter, there's obviously some risks and there's some opportunities.

I would say that we're biased to the upside, both in terms of net interest income and net interest margin versus our flat guidance, because I just see more opportunity than I do risk. We'll see how the quarter plays out, but that's where we're at right now.

Okay. Just following up on that, looking a little further out, what are some of the drivers you have for net interest margin expansion next year in the context of maybe a few rate cuts? Do you still think that you could get towards 3% in 2027?

We definitely see a path of net interest margin expansion getting to that 3% level in 2027. The drivers are going to be the ones that we've talked about in the past. We have fixed asset repricing that is quite mechanical. We've talked about the $3 billion of investment portfolio and the $5 to $7 billion of loans that reprice. We still have mix that we have in our control in terms of leaning more into card and commercial type of loans that are helping. I think of those things as having somewhere in that two to three basis points of embedded lift from a net interest margin standpoint. The third component is really going to be on the deposit side and the mix and pricing of that. That will depend a little bit.

The speed in which we gain to that 3% margin is going to depend on the curve, depends on deposit competition, and how we execute really on DDA and checking and all those sorts of accounts that we need to grow. We definitely see a path for 3% in 2027, but some of those macro environments might impact the speed in which we get there.

Your next question comes from the line of John Pancari of Evercore. Your line is open.

Morning, on the positive operating leverage, came in particularly solid this quarter, and you're clearly confident in the 200 basis points plus expectation for 2025. Can you give us just a little more color in terms of your confidence in that front or in that pace as you look into 2026, just given some of the investments that you're looking at, but also conversely some of the momentum you're clearly seeing on the revenue side? Could we see positive operating leverage exceed that 200-plus range as we look out?

Thank you, John. In terms of our guidance, of course, we've been signaling over 200 basis points of operating leverage this year, and we've been achieving that. Obviously, we had a lot of strength this quarter, and we continue to expect that in the fourth quarter. As we think about 2026, we haven't provided formal guidance there. We're in the middle of our planning process, of course. I think you can kind of see the key drivers here. You can think about net interest income having a good growth trajectory as we think about all the different items I just talked about, the fees. We continue to expect that mid-single-digit type of growth, and our expenses, we've been able to manage quite prudently. We expect to achieve meaningful positive operating leverage next year.

John, I'll just add, this is Gunjan. We are very confident in our expense management disciplines because our four signature programs have runway still to go, and the revenue outlook is positive. It does depend on the fee mix. As you know, we are very focused on improving our fee mix, and that tends to attract more expense, which we are very glad to do. That's the range. The business model lends itself to meaningful positive operating leverage for next year. It's just a matter of level.

Okay. Got it. Got it. On the fee side, you know, also some clear momentum there, some pretty good upside this quarter. As you mentioned in your prepared remarks, you're certainly seeing some of the momentum follow through in terms of your key drivers and then your payments space as well. I mean, I guess on the payment side, can you give us a little more color in terms of the drivers of the growth that you're seeing there and your confidence in that mid-single-digit expectation? Is there anything from the standpoint of customer acquisition or the benefits of the investments that you've made that you'd call out here as being key drivers to what seems to be a more sustainable consistency around your fee performance as of late?

Thank you. We are feeling very confident in the broad-based strength of the fees. Let me just share two things, then I'll get to the specifics on payments. We have made a lot of progress over the last 12 months on creating an operating model that creates interconnectivity between our product sets. The fees are lifting each other. Our relationship teams, our sales and marketing efforts are multi-product. Our product design is multi-product, and all of that is leading to a measurable lift in effectiveness of marketing dollars. That gives us some real shift in the trajectory here. What we track internally on payments, for example, is new card acquisitions that we can measure today that have grown nicely from past trends, and it takes 12 to 18 months for that revenue to catch up.

We are also seeing material strength in sold but not installed business on businesses like CPS and merchants. All of that leads us to have confidence in our mid-single-digit fee guidelines across the whole portfolio and payments overall, with upside over time as we gain momentum.

That upside would bode well for 2026, I assume there, Gunjan? Above that mid-single-digit level, possibly?

We've talked about mid-single-digit in the payment complex, and that's what our objective is with upside. I think that's where our starting point is. We'll have more detail, obviously, as we think about that in the next call, but that mid-single-digit is a good place to start to the plus.

I do also want to just reiterate that there is a lot of curiosity around payments, and in the fall, we are going to bring a deep dive on the merchant acquiring business and the card issuing businesses. I look forward to more dialogue there.

Your next question comes from the line of Kenneth Usdin of Autonomous Research. Your line is open.

Hi, thanks. Good morning. I just wanted to follow up on the payments point and ask you to dive in a little bit more. I think 3% year over year is not far from mid-single-digit, but that corporate piece is still counting negative, and credit and debit is still three-ish. I just want to, you know, give us some of the moving parts of the drivers now and when across the lines, where do you expect those to inflect?

Sure. Your question regarding the corporate payments side of the house, that has seen negative year-over-year prints the last couple of quarters. The drivers of that are really on the government side of the equation as well as corporate T&E. You could think of government spend as about 15% of this line item. Corporate T&E is kind of about the same thing, and those have had some headwinds in those particular areas. Gunjan mentioned uninstalled revenue and strong pipelines. That is certainly the case, and we expect to see some online versions of that coming on into the fourth quarter. We do expect improving trends in our year-on-year outlook on corporate payments. Merchants have had some strong quarter given success in our key verticals that we've been talking about, as well as some of the embedded finance and tech-led type of strategies in card.

As Gunjan mentioned, the marketing and account growth we see is very encouraging. Those are kind of the items that I talk about from a payment standpoint.

I can add just a line on the debit card, where the growth is really about growing your entire consumer franchise. We are very laser-focused on that and see a lot of upside over time with interconnected products between card and the consumer bank. As we see momentum in the, we showed you some data on consumer deposits. That was a very favorable set of trends over the last two years. That creates momentum in the total number of clients and usage of the bank accounts and the debit card revenue line. We should expect that to come. The real payment strategies focused on the card issuing and the merchant businesses that are the vast majority of our payments businesses. Of course, CPS is a very attractive business, and we are expecting those trends to reverse in due course here.

Great. One follow-up just related to consumer. It's great to see the card loss rate come back down now at 3.73% in the third quarter. Are we starting to see that maturation of the portfolio? Where do you expect to see that card loss rate go going forward, assuming a reasonably stable economy from here? Thanks.

Yeah, our view on credit right now is favorable. We see strong spend trends and credit trends, particularly the vast majority of our book is 720 or greater. The spend levels have been very good. The loss rates, as you mentioned, have come down meaningfully this quarter. There is some seasonality there, but for certain, our 2025 loss rate on card will be less than our loss rate in 2024. There is some good momentum there. As we get into 2026, we'll likely update you there. We don't see anything that gives us any concern in this area, and it has been a strong result.

Your next question comes from the line of Ebrahim Poonawala of Bank of America. Your line is open.

I just wanted to do, as we think about NII margin, I think deposit growth and pricing matters. I think, Gunjan, in your opening remarks, you talked about the Bank Smartly partnerships, branches, like all of those from an outside looking in. It's just very hard to figure out whether these are sticky deposits, lower-cost deposits. If you don't mind spending some time on just the client acquisition that's happening through these channels and how we should think about either the magnitude of growth they can drive as we look out the next couple of years and the cost structure of these deposits. Thanks.

Let me start, and then John will add on. The consumer clients and the consumer deposits, as you pointed out, are both sticky and favorably priced according to the total portfolio. We think about our deposits in three big categories: the consumer deposits, which includes our wealth franchise, and our wholesale deposits that you're very familiar with. We have a large trust business that is quite a unique property. Our ability to drive fee business growth is very helped by the balance sheet presence we have on the wholesale and the trust side. The pricing there is quite dynamic. The consumer and our focus on improving the mix of consumer deposits is all about creating stickiness and better funding costs. These clients also then feed enormous growth in other businesses.

We very steadily see a client that might start with us on a core checking account or a core savings account, then deepens with credit card, deepens with wealth, and deepens even on the small business side. Those are the strategies across all of the levers that you point out. I'll add to it digital acquisitions with marketing, which we have really stepped up in terms of our investments and our capabilities there as well. That is sort of the story on deposits and the consumer franchise. John, you'll add something on pricing.

Yeah, a couple of things I would just mention is we feel very good about where the deposit portfolio shaped out this quarter. We saw very strong growth in both consumer as well as on the commercial side of the equation. Our desire, as Gunjan just reiterated what she said, our growth is really to on deposits is to grow where it matters and where it's conducive to supporting fee growth. When we think about Bank Smartly, and you mentioned that product, Ebrahim, for us, we are highly encouraged because it is a product that has three times as much multi-products attached to that client when they open up this product. In and of itself, we know that it has more stickiness to it.

It brings in a new type of client into the bank, which is from a credit card standpoint, about half of the cards that open up are new relationships that we have to the bank, which is very encouraging. On the commercial side of the house, we saw a lot of growth on the deposit side across all sorts of different areas, including treasury management, and the investments we've been making in that business over the last couple of years really starting to come to fruition. We saw a lot of growth in investment services this quarter. There's just a lot of business activity. We gain a lot of deposits as there's just a lot of investments moving around. We house those deposits while that is occurring. All this activity that occurs is really beneficial to us.

For that reason, we saw benefits to our fee categories, as you saw this quarter. It's really all interconnected, which is the point of what Gunjan was saying earlier in the call.

Got it. That's helpful. I guess maybe going back to the margin discussion, John, you've talked about it was a pretty good expansion this quarter. You've talked about the 3%. I'm just wondering, as we think through the journey from 2.75% to 3%, is there a point where there's a pretty material inflection outside of the backbook repricing, everything that you talked about? I'm just wondering, is there a chance you could hit 3% by this time next year, by the fourth quarter? Is it just a very steady state, or are there going to be big step-ups in the progress towards that 3%?

Sure. I won't repeat everything I said on the drivers. To your point on the speed in which you get there, I'll point out that the curve from a SOFR versus five-year treasury is still quite inverted. A speed-up, if you will, of margin could be the Fed is programmatically cutting. The curve is more upward sloping on that part of the curve, and that could really help boost the speed in which net interest margin improves. The other sides on the asset side are going to be a little bit more mechanical and more embedded in how we move forward. It's really going to be the macro that's going to drive the speed in which we get there.

Your next question comes from the line of Michael Mayo of Wells Fargo. Your line is open.

Hi. I don't know if we put this in the category of the Loch Ness Monster, Bermuda Triangle, and the contents of NDFI, but I'm sure many appreciate your detailing of NDFI. That's not really the way you run the business by NDFI. I guess it's just connecting regulatory reporting with your business lines. Since you did disclose that, can you just give us a little bit more color? You say that credit quality is higher on NDFI than your core C&I portfolio, which is interesting. NDFI is 12% of the total loan book. Where would that have been, say, you know, 5 or 10 years ago? Any loans that you're not pursuing? The key to good credit quality is choosing to say no a lot. Thank you.

Sure, Mike. Thanks. I think the slide is in there because there's just been a lot of interest in the industry. You're right. I mean, it is a very broad set of businesses within there. Obviously, as you know, mortgage warehouse lending and subscription lines and auto ABS are very different items. We just wanted to show the sort of categories that we have. I think the point that we're trying to make is that our risk disciplines and how we think about the diversification of this book is something that we spend a lot of time on. It's not just the category for the category's sake. It's just the way we operate in terms of our credit culture. We think about the multiple ways that there's repayment. We think about how fees are over-collateralized.

We think about the data that is needed to look through on some of these structures and things like that and the risk limits embedded in there. Ultimately, we know these clients a lot over many years. Many of these clients we've been servicing in many different products over a vast number of years. In terms of the growth that we've seen, I don't have a number for you in terms of 5 or 10 years, but it obviously has grown pretty substantially over the last several years. We're very comfortable with it because we, again, we know the clients.

These are broad relationships on the fee side in addition to the loan book. That's just client selection there.

Where would you say you choose to say no a little bit more often than not? In other words, you could have faster loan growth. Any bank could. Is there any areas where you say, "Hey, let's pay more attention to this"?

Sure. We have that conversation all the time on our credit committees and things of that variety. We're talking about line items and single counterparty limits and things of that variety, and a number of different things. We're careful about certain areas that, when we look through, have more leverage and things of that variety. We want to make sure we understand it. It's all on the credit profile, and the client selection is very important. We're servicing a number of the different large players here that are very well known to the market, and we feel very comfortable about the book.

Your next question comes from the line of Saul Martinez of HSBC. Your line is open.

Hey, good morning. Just wanted to quickly follow up on the fourth quarter net interest income outlook being stable. I get that there is a bias to the upside. John, you did mention that there are some upside sources and there are some risks. I think you mentioned credit card favorability in 3Q and some other risks. I'm not sure I understand. Could you just elaborate a little bit on what the card favorability dynamics are and what the other downside risks are? What are you assuming there for rates in the fourth quarter? How are you thinking about the rate backdrop in 2026? Are you working with a forward curve, which I think has five cuts in it, which presumably would be good for you? Any color on how you're thinking about the rate backdrop next year would be helpful.

Also, what are you assuming for the fourth quarter and how is it influencing your guidance at all?

Sure. Let me go with the assumptions first. I think that's a good place to start on your questions. You know, from a curve and from a rate perspective, we do include two cuts this year. We also have two more cuts in 2026. Maybe we're a little bit late relative to the market in terms of cuts, but you know that obviously always shifts. We do have longer-term yields. I'll just pick on the 10-year Treasury as an example, more in the 4.25%, 4 to 4.5%, excuse me, 4.25% to 4.5% range for the 2026 year. As I think about the fourth quarter to get to the more specifics of what you were talking about, we have a lot of upside in terms of the things that have been working for us in the past in terms of fixed asset repricing.

The mix is obviously going to be very favorable for us. When I think about the things that are going the other way for the fourth quarter, we did have meaningful pickup in credit card yield this quarter. There were fees that we picked up as well as just strength in that area. Some of that is seasonality. We expect that to reverse in the fourth quarter, just given the trends that we are observing. All in all, as we put together these things, there's obviously a lot of moving parts, especially in the fourth quarter. I'll reiterate that we see more opportunity than we do risk, as it's embedded into our call.

I'll add that the fourth quarter credit card dynamics are very seasonal and expected. It's the holiday season dynamics. We expect that. There's nothing unique about what we are seeing in that book at this time. It's just the holiday season changes the dynamics there a little bit.

Okay, that's helpful. Maybe the positive is spread, I guess, by the size of the sustainable finance business and the growth you've seen there. It is a pretty big part of the other income line. I just wanted to make sure I understood. You are expecting continued growth as you see a pull forward of some of this activity from current levels. If that is the case, what does it mean for the other income line? That has been moving higher, I guess. I know it can jump around quarter to quarter, but should we be thinking that line is going to move higher as well as this business continues to grow?

Yeah, our view is that this Impact Finance line will improve and increase. We've had, as we saw on the slide, a 17% increase. We expect this to be a high single-digit type of business over the medium term. There may be some pull forward given some of the legislative moves and things of that variety, but we see the momentum in the business. They've been gaining market share. It's an area that the team has had a lot of focus on. You look at renewable energy tax credits, and you look at low-income housing and things of that variety. These are areas that we, and new market tax credits, we're number one in terms of that market share. We've been building our capabilities here, and the additional tailwinds have been some of the administrative or the legislative areas that have helped us here as well.

Saul, you're right. It's quite a large business today. It started out in the other category, and we've had some questions from all of you on sort of what really is there. We wanted to highlight a part of the business that's actually very core to what we do. It's ingrained in day-to-day sort of running of the businesses, but it has become quite sizable also because of Union Bank. The Union Bank acquisition for us is about three years old now, and we are just beginning to realize the revenue benefits of some of that client base and the presence in California. This business is a good example of sort of what a good, strong presence in California can do to certain line items. It's a very attractive business for us, a long, long-standing business, which just has become quite large now.

Your next question comes from the line of Gerard Cassidy of RBC Capital Markets. Your line is open.

Good morning, Gunjan. Good morning, John.

Can you guys share with us, obviously, there's a lot of talk about stablecoins and the impact it may have on the payments business. Can you share with us how you're getting out in front of it and what you're doing to prepare yourselves for the stablecoin activity eventually coming into the payments business?

Yes. Good morning, Gerard. We are working on stablecoins in two very distinct areas. The first is around the capital markets and investments part of it, where the business model is very clear and it's very favorable to us. This is custody and safekeeping of the collateral underlying stablecoins or custody and safekeeping of cryptocurrency assets. These are products that have been produced some time back, have reintroduced with the shift in the supervisory environment, and are quite confident in our ability to just provide those products. The other side is stablecoins as a payment rail where the client demand is more muted, although there are a lot of discussions. There are efforts twofold. One is to just be ready to onboard and offboard a stablecoin into the banking system, and we are working on that in conjunction with the industry consortiums.

The second is just being ready to provide stablecoin services as a payment vehicle should that market take off within our client base. We expect to pilot some stablecoin transactions yet this year with some partnerships in the market. We are also very aware that we have a unique franchise in Elan where we provide credit card payment services to 1,200 smaller banks on a white-label service. This is also a question that we'll get from our smaller bank base. We are just studying that market and being ready for if it takes off. The real momentum from revenues and a clear business case and an economic model is on the custody and investment side. It is a multidimensional field that's moving very fast. We've just announced some organizational changes to stay current with the industry as it evolves and more to come there.

Very good. Thank you. Can you remind us when you look out over the next 12 or 24 months as your common equity tier 1 capital ratio with the AOCI included continues to grow, your views of returning capital to shareholders? For years, U.S. Bancorp consistently returned 75 to 80% of earnings. Can you kind of refresh our memories on what you think the long-term return will be to shareholders?

Sure. Gerard, it's John here. We're obviously continuing to build our capital base. I would consider that we're in the final lap, if you will, of building out our capital. We were at 8.4% a couple of years ago. You'll recall we're at 10.9% now. We gave you the number with included in AOCI and where we're attempting to get into. Obviously, we are looking to increase that amount. It may not be this quarter, but as we look into 2026, we certainly have a feel that the glide path will be there to increase our pace and get to that 75% area that we had mentioned on the slide that you'll see there. We're very much committed to that. That, along with the things we have to balance, like things like loan growth and things like that, will take it quarter by quarter.

That just gives you kind of high-level how we're thinking about it.

Great. Thank you. Gunjan, thank you for bringing Mark Runkel to the call for the details about payments. We appreciate it. Thank you.

Thank you, Gerard. Mark and Courtney. Courtney will present on the card issuing business, which is sort of a big part of our business. Mark will join you for MPS. Look forward to that.

Your next question comes from the line of Erika Najarian of UBS. Your line is open.

Hi. Just a few clean-up questions, if I may. First, I wanted to clarify, John, you said fixed asset repricing is two to three basis points of embedded lift. I just wanted to clarify if that embedded lift is a per-quarter statement. Also, as we think about fixed asset repricing, is that more tethered to the belly of the curve or the 10-year range that you mentioned, 425-450?

Sure. Just to be clear, let me, and thank you for allowing me to clarify. When I said the 2 to 3 basis points, I was referring to mix as well as fixed asset repricing that we have on a quarterly basis. Think of that as an embedded quarterly type of improvement that should be happening. As we know, every quarter there can be movements in balance sheet that can alter net interest margin, and we don't always manage the net interest margin as an output. Directionally, obviously, we want that to improve and things of that variety. In terms of the mix, or excuse me, the repricing and where we focus on, it's more the belly of the curve is probably more appropriate.

The five-year treasury, I think, is always a good proxy to look at, and obviously spreads where those are at, whether it's mortgage spreads or credit spreads just in general. Those are the items that I look at.

Thank you. My second question is for Gunjan. The stock is clearly reacting favorably today. You had a nice beat to consensus really on the revenue side, and it's really the revenue side that's driving the positive operating leverage this quarter. As you think forward, how are you balancing some of the embedded momentum that you have been talking about on this call that you're going to continue to talk about in Boston in a few weeks versus what seems to be a lot of questions and pressure on larger management teams in terms of questions on scale and having a relatively short inorganic growth window under this current administration?

Erica, good morning. Thank you for the question. When I stepped into my role now six months back, we had very clearly articulated three priorities, and they were connected to each other. The first, most urgent from a sequencing and timing standpoint, was expenses. Our opportunity was very real there. We had finished embedding Union Bank. We had finished all of the work we were doing to restore our capital positions. It was appropriate to bring the efficiency ratio back to what the business model requires it to be, which is mid to high 50s. Having done that, we exceeded what we wanted to do from the efficiency ratio and positive operating leverage standpoint and released a fair amount of investment to invest in organic growth. You're beginning to see that show up now.

You'll see payments show up sequentially a little bit behind that just because the sales cycles and the revenue models take time. That's why we talk about leading indicators. It is less a matter of balancing between them, but one fueling the other, with the ultimate goal being EPS growth that is also accompanied by very high attractive returns. You know John pointed out that we have increased our return on tangible capital very specifically. Going forward, you'll see the growth side of the equation become more present in our strategies. First, with all of the fee businesses, our evolution to a more attractive asset side with more leaning in on C&I and credit loans and on deposits, more attractive balance sheet leaning in on the consumer side. You see NII growth and you see fee growth. You're going to start seeing the strategies for payments.

We are feeling very good about the momentum organically over time and certainly see very real opportunity and quite a lot of runway on organic growth for us.

Just to clarify, Gunjan, given how you answered that question, U.S. Bancorp's focus, and obviously, like John said, you're sort of in the final phase of rebuilding capital, your focus is inward and not outward in terms of bank acquisitions. I just want to be clear that that's the message that you're giving us.

Our focus is very much on organic growth.

U.S. Bancorp (USB) Q3 2025 Earnings Call Transcript

Company Participants