With a combined revenue of $21 trillion and $2.1 trillion in profits, the 2026 Fortune 500 is the definitive list of America's largest companies.

Fortune 500

AI is a major force shaping this year’s list—but it’s far from the only story.

World's Most Admired Companies

Almost $20 trillion in revenue—and a record-breaking $1.87 trillion in profits. Introducing the 2025 Fortune 500, the definitive list of the biggest companies in America.

Leaders in all industries rely more than ever on Big Tech—and appreciate the giants that deliver, at scale, without drama.

Industries included in the sector are mining, oil and gas exploration and services, pipelines, refining, and utilities.

Fortune Sector Leaders: Energy

The Fortune 500, in its 70th year in 2024, ranks the biggest U.S. companies by revenue.

The 26th edition of the list shows how much esteem Big Tech giants command among other business leaders.

The 25th Fortune World’s Most Admired Companies list suggests that tech giants’ peers respect them as much as ever.

The Fortune 500, in its 69th year in 2023, ranks the biggest U.S. companies by revenue.

Just as it dominates our economy, Big Tech now dominates Fortune’s annual ranking of corporate reputation.

This year’s Fortune 500 marks the 68th running of the list.

After a year in which humanity leaned more heavily than ever on tech giants, see which companies topped Fortune's ranking of corporate reputation.

This year’s Fortune 500 marks the 67th running of the list.

The second-largest utility company in the U.S. by consumers services over 9 million customers with gas and electric power across six states in the Southeastern U.S.

For an astounding 13th straight year, Apple claims the top spot in Fortune’s annual ranking of corporate reputation, based on a survey of almost 3,800 executives, directors, and analysts.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 66th running of the list.

F500-2020-153-Southern-Company

This energy holding company produces and sells electricity across the Southeast through subsidiaries Alabama Power, Georgia Power, and Mississippi Power, while also distributing natural gas through other units.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 65th running of the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 64th running of the list.

Here are the World's Most Admired Companies for 2017 as ranked in their industries. See who made the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 63rd running of the list.

Here are the World's Most Admired Companies for 2016 as ranked in their industries. See who made the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 62nd running of the list.

Business insiders have spoken: Asked which companies they most admire, more than 4,100 executives, directors, and analysts chose these top 50 All-Stars.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 61st running of the list. Wal-Mart claims the top spot again. See who made the list.

Wal-Mart stayed on top as its sales crept closer to half-a-trillion dollars. Apple moved into the top five. And UnitedHealth Group continued its steady climb. 

Fortune Global 500

Sector

Industry

Current All-Star Rank

Previous All-Star Rank

Industry Rank

Previous Industry Rank

Overall Score

Innovation

People Management

Use of Corporate Assets

Social Responsibility

Quality of Management

Financial Soundness

Long-Term Investment Value

Quality of Products/Services

Global Competitiveness

Key Financials (last Fiscal Year)

Revenues ($M)

Profits ($M)

Assets ($M)

Total Stockholder Equity ($M)

Profit Ratios

Profit as % of Revenues

Profits as % of Assets

Profits as % of Stockholder Equity

Earnings Per Share (last Fiscal Year)

Earnings Per Share ($)

EPS % Change (from prior fiscal year)

EPS % Change (5 year annual rate)

EPS % Change (10 year annual rate)

Total Return

Total Return to Investors (last year)

Total Return to Investors (5 year, annualized)

Total Return to Investors (10 year, annualized)

The Atlanta-based Southern Co. stays true to its name as the dominant power and utility player in Georgia, Alabama, and Mississippi with a mix of gas-fired, coal, nuclear, and renewable power generation. Southern also distributes natural gas in Tennessee, Virginia, and elsewhere. But Southern’s power business of wholesale gas and renewables operates in 15 states from California to Maine, showcasing the company’s growth well outside of the legacy Deep South. And its expanding PowerSecure business offers microgrid services nationwide. Likewise, the Southern Linc and Telecom businesses offer telecommunications and fiber-optics services to meet increasing demand.

Q2 2026

Q1 2026

Q4 2025

Q3 2025

Q2 2025

Q1 2025

Q4 2024

Q3 2024

Southern (SO): Company Profile, Stock Price, News, Rankings

legacy

Southern

southern

As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. It is now my pleasure to introduce Mr. Greg McLeod. Thank you. You may begin.

Thank you, Julian. Good afternoon, and welcome to Southern Company's Q3 2024 earnings call. Joining me today are Chris Womack, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Southern Company and Dan Tucker, Chief Financial Officer. Let me remind you that we will make forward looking statements today in addition to providing historical information. Various important factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated in the forward looking statements, including those discussed in our Form 10 ks, Form 10 Q and subsequent filings.

In addition, we will present non GAAP financial information on this call. Reconciliations to the applicable GAAP measure are included in the financial information we released this morning as well as the slides for this conference call, which are both available on our Investor Relations website at investor. Southerncompany.com. I'll now turn the call over to Chris Womack.

you for joining us today. Our entire company, including our premier state regulated electric, gas and utilities continued to perform well during the Q3, especially as our dedicated employees across Southern Company came together as one team in response to Hurricane Helene. The resolve and the professionalism of our employees has never been more evident than was demonstrated through the recent storm restoration efforts in Georgia. Before Dan provides an overview of our financial results, I'd like to share our story from this unprecedented weather event. Hurricane Helene was a storm of historic magnitude.

Its aftermath was met with an extraordinary response from our dedicated team across Southern Company, our mutual assistance partners, state and local first responders and emergency management agencies and government officials all across Georgia. Persistent rain, extreme flooding and heavy winds resulted in what can only be characterized as devastation to many of the communities we serve, with the destruction stretching 100 of miles impacting the eastern 2 thirds of the entire state. Ultimately, the damage caused by Hurricane Helene was the most destructive in Georgia Power's 140 year history, exceeding the damage caused by the largest the 3 largest storms to impact Georgia Power's service territory combined. Helane entered Southern Georgia as a Category 1 hurricane and resulted in 53 out of the 159 counties in the state being declared major disaster areas by the Federal Energy Emergency Management Agency. With considerable damage to transmission infrastructure, nearly 12,000 damaged utility poles and some 1500 miles of down wires, the equivalent of the distance between Atlanta and Phoenix, Arizona.

Our customers experienced over 1,500,000 outages in the wake of the storm. With the support of resources from across North America, a workforce of well over 20,000 worked around the clock to safely reconnect customers through extremely difficult conditions. Commensurate with the devastation seen in our communities, much of our utility infrastructure was damaged beyond mere repair and significant portions of our system in the affected regions required a complete rebuild. Thanks to the contributions of our utility industry partners and especially thanks to the unwavering commitment of our own hard working dedicated crews, many of whom lived in these same communities and some of whom endured destruction to their own homes, the restoration and rebuilding efforts were 95% complete within 8 days with power restored to over a 500,000 customers within the first 48 hours. We are incredibly proud of our team's response and internally grateful to be a part of an industry that works so well together in times of need.

Many of the communities we're privileged to serve across Eastern Georgia have a long road ahead to recovery. Georgia Power, Atlanta Gas Light, Southern Company are contributing to organizations to aid these communities. And Georgia Power has taken additional steps to provide support and resources to our customers in Georgia. In our business model, customers are at the center of everything we do. And our commitment to the communities and customers we serve has never been more important than in times like these.

I'm extremely proud of our team's exceptional efforts to clearly demonstrate that we are a citizen wherever we serve each and every day. Dan, I'll now turn the call over to you for a financial update.

Thanks, Chris, and good afternoon, everyone. Before I walk through the Q3 financial results, I'd like to briefly address the costs associated with the recovery efforts Chris just described related to Hurricane Helene. The initial estimated cost for this historic storm related restoration and rebuild is approximately $1,100,000,000 The unprecedented destruction associated with this weather event combined with impacts of inflation on the cost of contract labor, supplies, food, fuel and lodging contribute to the overall cost. Our estimate is subject to change over the next several months as estimates are replaced with bills from our mutual assistance partners as we complete the final cleanup of damaged equipment and as we work to ensure the impacted areas are restored to meet our standards for long term reliability. That is not to suggest that our estimate is likely to materially change, but rather to acknowledge that it takes time to fully capture the ultimate cost of such an extensive endeavor.

Turning now to our financial results. For the Q3 of 2024, our adjusted earnings were $1.43 per share, dollars 0.01 higher than the Q3 of 2023. The primary drivers of our performance for the quarter compared to last year were continued investment in our state regulated utilities and customer growth. This was mostly offset by higher interest, depreciation and other operating expenses. And for the 9 months ended September 30, 2024, our adjusted earnings per share were $3.56 compared with adjusted earnings per share of $3.01 for the same period in 2023.

1 of the largest drivers in our year to date results compared with the prior year is weather related impacts from an extremely mild first half of twenty twenty three, contrasted with the weather effects we've experienced thus far in 2024. A complete reconciliation of the year over year earnings is included in the materials we released this morning. Our adjusted EPS estimate for the Q4 is $0.49 per share, which combined with our year to date performance would represent full year adjusted earnings of $4.05 per share. After excluding a 0.4% negative impact of lost sales that resulted from the damage caused by Hurricane Helene, weather normalized total retail electricity sales were essentially flat compared with the Q3 of 2023. The broad strength of the economy in the Southeast was exhibited in the quarter by strong electricity sales in the chemical, pipeline and transportation segments as well as data center power usage, which continued its positive trend and was up 10% year over year.

And while weather normalized residential electricity usage per customer was slightly down in the quarter, we saw strong residential customer additions of 12,000 in our electric businesses and 7,000 new customers in our natural gas distribution businesses. The economic development activity across our electric service territories remains robust and our pipeline continues to grow at an historic pace. 42 companies either established or expanded operation in our service territory in the Q3, generating 5,000 plus potential new jobs and representing capital investments totaling approximately $2,600,000,000 Alabama Power's economic activity this quarter represented its strongest quarter in several years led by announcements in metals, renewable energy and the chemical segment. The combined pipeline for new industrial and other large load commercial customers across our 3 state electric utility footprint continues to grow. The upcoming quarterly large load economic development report to be filed with the Georgia Public Service Commission is expected to reflect that Georgia Power's potential load additions in its economic development pipeline have grown to over 36 gigawatts by the mid-two 2030s with 8 gigawatts committed.

Chris, I'll turn the call back over to you.

Thanks, Dan. We have delivered exceptional operational and solid financial results through the 1st 3 quarters of the year and we are well positioned to finish the year strong. Our team's resilience in the face of a historic storm highlights our dedication to the customers and the communities we are privileged to serve and I am so extremely grateful and proud to be a part of their team. It is certainly an exciting time for our great company and for this industry. With supportive states and constructive regulation, along with our portfolio of state regulated electric and gas utilities, we are well positioned for the opportunity presented by this extraordinary energy demand growth our industry is projecting in the coming years.

As we work to help our states grow and partner with the communities we are privileged to serve, our disciplined approach combined with the orderly planning and regulatory processes across our utility service territories should support mutual benefits for all of our stakeholders, including our existing customers. Let me conclude by saying, I am very excited about our future. Operator, we are now ready to take questions.

Thank you. We will now be conducting a question and answer session. Our first question comes from Carly Davenport, Goldman Sachs.

Hey, good afternoon. Thanks for taking the questions. Maybe just to start on the storm cost side, appreciate the color on the kind of $1,100,000,000 estimate at this point. Will all of that be deferred? And can you just talk through the process and the timing for filing for recovery of those costs in Georgia?

Yes. And per usual, Carly, we don't want to get too far ahead of any upcoming regulatory processes or make assumptions about how the commission will ultimately decide to deal with it. Just I think it's good to acknowledge historically, they've been very constructive and the recovery has been timely and balanced kind of the needs of the company and the customers. In terms of where we sit today, yes, all the costs have been deferred. There is still work to do, not unlike just turning estimates into more firm numbers.

Again, don't expect material changes there. There's also we will also go through a process of determining, particularly based on the nature of this rebuild that occurred, not just restoration, how much of these dollars are ultimately capital dollars, essentially new assets as opposed to the cost to support the crews, cost to simply rehang wires, those look would typically look more like O and M, but those will be deferred and potentially recovered in a different manner than the capital cost.

Got it. Okay. That's super helpful. Thank you. And then maybe just pivoting to the load growth side, appreciate the updates there on the pipeline in Georgia.

Could you just talk a little bit about how that pipeline has developed and also the commitments in the context of the upcoming IRP filing in Georgia? How are you thinking about the potential magnitude or mix of that filing just based on what you've seen so far in terms of how that large load pipeline has developed and how that pipeline has converted to actual customer commitments?

Yes, that's a great question, Carly. So and again, without getting too far ahead of any processes or actual filings, the reason that Georgia Power is making this quarterly filing with the PSC was really to help all parties have a little bit better line of sight leading into the next formal process. And so since we began that process, we've seen not only momentum continue in the size of the pipeline, but we have to your point seen continued commitments within that pipeline. So as we sit here today, again we have 8,000 megawatts that have been committed by the kind of mid-two thousand and thirty timeframe, Whereas at the time of our filing last fall with the Public Service Commission, that number was more like 3,600 megawatts. And so we're continuing to see that kind of progress.

Carly, one thing I would add, and we talk about it a lot as we go through kind of our narrative about how this process works. And I talk a lot about our orderly processes. And I think as you look forward to this next large load filing and then as we as the company prepares for the integrated resource planning process. I think that demonstrates that process that's in place to clearly demonstrate what's real and then how we price this and just how we work our way through bringing these projects online, but just working through an orderly process because there's a lot of activity out there in the marketplace, but I think we owe it to our regulatory bodies, but also to all of our states to make sure we're being very diligent. And as we work through this process to bring these projects online.

Got it. Very clear. Thanks so much for the time.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Shahriar Pourreza, Guggenheim Partners.

I just wanted to maybe start with Southern Power for a sec. Sort of this kind of push for resource adequacy being so front and center in almost every jurisdiction. I mean Southern Power is predominantly contracted, but I have to imagine kind of the off takers want to stick with the assets. Are you seeing kind of any opportunities around restriking the contracts and extending the tenors? Are you seeing opportunities as contracts roll off?

And how do we think about pricing kind of in this environment and what it could also mean for Southern Power's growth? Thanks.

Yes. Let me start, Shar, and just level set on Southern Power. So we've always taken approach with Southern Power to have it have a risk profile that looks and feels like the regulated business. So long term contracts, creditworthy counterparties, we don't take fuel risk. And so that portfolio and in particular if we focus in on the natural gas generation portfolio is largely covered, I mean 90% plus covered through the end of this decade.

And so it's not until then that you begin to have contracts that are up for renewal. Now obviously we would have an opportunity to renew or extend to your point well before the end of the decade. And so in that context, as we look at the current contract rates relative to what capacity values appear to be out in that timeframe, they've essentially doubled relative to what they were. But again, this is a long term opportunity to kind of improve the returns within Southern Power. So yes, there is great interest in that capacity.

Beyond the existing assets, we're also getting pinged, if you will, continuously by customers hoping to be able to add new assets, whether those be natural gas or renewables, whether that's in the Southeast or in other markets, particularly where we have renewables. And it's the same kind of potential customer mix that we have today. We serve a lot of load serving entities, So investor owned utilities, municipalities, co ops, but we also, particularly in our renewable portfolio, serve a lot of large commercial industrial customers directly through contract. They may be in structured markets, but it's ultimately a contract with an individual customer. So we're exploring those 2, but maintaining that same discipline I described on the front end, long term contract tracks, credit where the counter parties, no fuel

Got it. But that discipline doesn't really curtail or put a ceiling on how big you expect Southern Power to get because the opportunities are pretty sizable.

Yes, I think that's right, Shahriar. And just historically, I think even going forward, we are a regulated utility holding company and we have this incredibly attractive complementary wholesale generation business that we've never wanted to get outsized relative to our retail business, our retail electric business or in gas business. That said, the regulated utility business is growing so fast right now. I have no concerns about Southern Power's growth rate outstripping that.

Okay. But Sean, just always remember, we talk about being disciplined and just know that in the midst of all this opportunity, we will remain very disciplined as we move through this period.

And then just lastly, just on follow-up for Carly's, just fine tuning. Just Dan, do you have any sense you've got an estimated cost number there. You said 1.1 it could change. But do you have any sense on how much of that could be capital versus O and M? And then how do we sort of think about the timing of that recovery going into a GRC as we're thinking about bill impact and customer affordability, right?

So there's a bunch of things happening at once and this is a big GRC coming up. So how do we sort of think about the risks

Yes. On your first point, Shar, it's just too early to say. I think intuitively, we believe it will likely skew at least a little more capital than historically. But in terms of what that actually looks like, it's hard to say.

And the reason that that's our belief is simply because of the magnitude of rebuilding that occurred in this storm. And then in terms of the process, again, you know us and we go back to Chris' comments. We're going to remain disciplined and part of our discipline is not getting ahead and making assumptions about what our regulatory processes will be. There's going to be lots of variables, not only the split of the capital versus this other piece, but just what else is being considered at the time. And I think the most important thing to look back on is the constructive approach that the commission has taken historically.

Perfect. I appreciate it guys. Thanks so much. See you in about a week.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Ross Fowler, Bank of America.

Good morning, Chris. Good morning, Dan. So maybe following on to Shahriar's question, he asked most of it. But Dan, maybe not commenting on whatever happens in the future, but in the past, sort of as you've worked through storm recovery processes in Georgia, this isn't the first hurricane you've ever had. What is the typical sort of cash recovery lag?

Can you remind us what that looks like? And then does that create an opportunity for securitization? Can that be done in the state? And then how do you sort of finance the gap between kind of the expenses that have gone out, hung on the balance sheet versus the actual cash recovery of this going forward?

Yes. Look, I think the PSC has in their hands every tool at their disposal to overlay kind of a flexible approach to this. Without being too precise about history, I think it's fair to say it has depended on the magnitude of the storm and the circumstances at the time, but the recovery periods have been from a couple of years to as many as 6 years, depending on how big the balance was and what else was kind of being factored into rates at the same time.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Nick Campanella, Barclays.

Hey, good afternoon, everyone. Thanks for taking my question. Hope everyone's doing well.

of get your perspective. 36 gigawatts is a big number. You already have Gate 8 committed to your point. It just kind of seems like there's pressure higher on your load outlook every quarter here. And you have seen some peers in the space starting to kind of revise numbers, specifically kind of EPS outlooks on this.

And I'm just kind of curious, is there a tipping point for you into where you would essentially need to kind of reevaluate the 5% to 7%? Is there a point where the plan can sustain a rate based growth figure even net of kind of financing drag that would kind of put you above that 5% to 7% range? Thanks.

Sure. So I'll start Nick with what I've said historically on the growth rate. I would not expect anything to change in the near term everything we're describing. So let's go back to the 36 gigawatts that we're referring to. That's by the mid-2030s.

That's not a 2024, 2025, 2026 kind of phenomenon. That's long term. There certainly gets feathered in through the end of the decade and then well into the next decade. But every opportunity that exists here for acceleration of anything is long term in nature. And what I've said historically is to the extent this momentum continues and the momentum is less about the pipeline as it is the commitments and the risk adjusted outlook on sales and the capital that it takes to serve that load.

If that continues, long term in the latter half of our outlook, there may be an opportunity to reevaluate where the growth is starting from. As we sit here today, I don't think 5% to 7% as a rate of growth changes. But again, we will evaluate it when we get there. You mentioned a lot of the moving parts here. We shared earlier this year that our long term sales growth or at least the back half of the plan was close to 6%.

With everything we're seeing when we update our plan in February for you all, I won't be surprised that's a higher number. When we get to February, we'll unveil our capital plan. We've already talked along the way and disclosed in our Q several things that are incremental to our capital plan earlier this year, handful of Southern Power projects, a little bit of refinement around the Georgia Power IRP process and the IRP update around storage and the cost of Plant Yates and its certification. We've seen the details around the Southern Natural Pipeline opportunity that we own 50% of. Those things on their own that are known are roughly $3,000,000,000 of incremental capital relative to our $48,000,000,000 plan.

It won't surprise me given what we're seeing that there are several $1,000,000,000 on top of that reflected in our plan in February. So we're taking a long term view here. There's lots of opportunity. We're being very disciplined about how we approach this.

That's great, Dan. I appreciate all that context. Thank you for that. And I know the IRP filing is coming. You guys have been kind of leaders in the nuclear space.

Can you just kind of talk about how this fits into the company's wider generation outlook, even if it's at kind of the consolidated level? Are there relicensing opportunities? Are there operate opportunities to consider? And there was discussion about a potential multistate framework and is that something that you are part of? Maybe you could talk about this a little bit.

Yes. Look, there's obviously a lot in that question as well. Let's just put it in the context of the IRP. Just not going to get ahead of any regulatory processes, but let's talk about what that process looks like, right? It's at the end of the day, it's reflecting and projecting out scenarios under various moving parts, environmental rules, the cost of natural gas over time, the cost of capital over time.

And those scenarios are solving for the most economic reliable way to serve customers in the long term. Is it possible that one of those scenario model runs spits out a nuclear operate or a new nuclear unit as the solution in the model? Sure, it might. Does that mean that's a recommendation? No.

Does that mean that's a path we've embarked on? No. Does that mean it's an option that is worth preserving and considering down the road? Of course, it is. But there's a lot that's going to take place before we get to that point.

And that's I think what you hear a lot of us in the industry talking about. New nuclear is super important for this country, but in order to get to the right place, there's got to be better risk mitigation that exists today. That's got to come from changes with the federal government, that could come from some of these conversations with these large technology companies. We're talking to as many of these companies as anyone. I'd argue we're having conversations with the majority of them, not just around nuclear, just around different ways to solve for this load equation.

So it's a part of a broader conversation, but our discipline around this, and I'll tell you as my discipline as CFO, we're not going down that path until the risk is mitigated. But Chris, what

Dan, I think you're exactly right. I mean, there's a lot of work that needs to be done at the federal level if this country is to embrace more nuclear. I mean, and Dan said it, I mean, Southern Company has engaged with over majority, maybe all of the hyperscalers regarding nuclear solutions, but other solutions to respond to their data center needs. But there are just so many risks that have to be dealt with. I mean, the risk is simply just too great.

I mean, I'm hopeful and I we are trying to encourage to make sure that the government leans in, in a manner that helps mitigate the risk to shareholders and existing customers. But we're not going to move forward until we see better line of sight in terms of those risks being mitigated. But between the federal government and some of the hyperscalers, and we hope we can see hope there's progress and advancement on responding to what needs to be done, but also helping mitigate some of this risk.

I appreciate your guys' perspective on it and looking forward to seeing you in Florida. Thanks.

Thank you. Thank you for that. Our next question comes from Jameson Ward, Jefferies.

Hey guys, it's Julian here actually. Thanks again for taking the question. Maybe to follow-up on Nick's last one here, if you can just elaborate a little bit further here on the nuclear side. I mean clearly a lot of focus. You guys obviously led the Vanguard here at the outset of the last build out cycle.

Can you speak a little bit more, you talk about preserving the option over time. That doesn't sound like it's kind of a nearer term development that you could press release in next year with the hyperscaler percentage. I just want to make sure I'm hearing this right. This is more preliminary than maybe what we've seen from some of your peers out there. I don't want to put words in your mouth, I'm just sort of curious to tease out of you how far down that rabbit hole you are considering the expertise that you guys bring to the table on the subject, whether an SMR or AP went down?

No, I think you said it upfront. I mean, we've had we were the Vanguard, we've had this experience, and we recognize and fully understand the risks that are there. And so as we spoke earlier, we think before we can move down this path, we've got to find solutions to mitigate the risk to our shareholders, but also to our customers with nuclear. And so that's kind of where we are. I mean, we'll go through the RFP processes that and as we go through those models and all the different scenarios in terms of what may come forward.

But from a nuclear perspective, the risk issues are just so real and we know what they are that we've got to find some way to mitigate those issues before we see the opportunity, we see the reality of moving forward.

Okay. Thank you. Our next question comes from Jeremy Tonet, JPMorgan.

Hi, good afternoon. Happy Halloween. If I could just continue on the nuclear side a bit here, and I know you touched on up rates there a bit, but just wanted to see at a high level if you could share any thoughts at all as far as what the opportunity set the range of, I guess, upgrade potential there? And I know there's a lot of variables in play, economics and all the other factors that you've listed. But just wondering directionally, if you could give

Yes. Look, again, Jeremy, I hate to keep saying this. We're not going to get ahead of any regulatory processes. I'll give you just a little color there. So broadly across the enterprise, so this is not Georgia Power specific, but Georgia Power and Alabama Power and remember we have co owners on all of these things.

We do have 6 legacy units that there are opportunities for upgrades. Historically, many of those up rates have not been economic. The benefits that are inherent in the IRA and some of the other legislation help with that and are pushing them to a point where they are potentially more viable, not that they don't require a significant amount of capital, not that they don't require significant amount of time, but certainly don't bring with them the kind of risk of a new nuclear project. So it is certainly something on the table that we are evaluating and at the right time we'll put that forward as an option if appropriate.

Great. Thank you for that. And then just want to kind of shift gears given the big call on generation as you've outlined there, just wondering any thoughts you could share with, I guess, coal retirement timelines, what could be impacted there? And then even as it relates to carbon capture, is that something that you see as plausible for coal or gas or just any thoughts as it relates to some of it?

Couple of things. On coal retirements, clearly we're watching and paying attention to the EPA rules and that will clearly instruct and inform us and as we go through planning processes in terms of what those what the life of those projects will look like. So that's a couple of things that we'll of course continue to pay attention to. And what was the second part of your question?

Just as it relates to carbon capture potential for both the coal and gas.

So as you know, we've been operating the National Carbon Capture Center now for some 50 years. And so we initially were doing a lot of carbon capture research around coal. We have shifted that research now to gas. And we have a number of partners from the utility industry, but also partners from the oil and gas industry because we all recognize the vital role that natural gas will play in this economy and supporting electricity generation and knowing how important it will be to bring forth technology for carbon capture as well as sequestration. We continue to pursue this work.

We know there's more research to be done to get this at a point where it's scalable. But we're going to continue to make this investment because we think gas will be essential for this country going forward. And we'll continue to invest in the National Carbon Capture Center, but also find other research opportunities to invest in carbon capture and research carbon capture.

That's very helpful. And one last quick one, if I could sneak in in just as it relates to the pipe sap opportunity as you laid it out there, I think as part of the $3,000,000,000 there. But just was wondering, I guess, if you could provide a little bit more color on what that could look like, just size of gas you'd like to get into your service territory? And what type of timeframe do you see this ultimately unfolding over?

Yes. So there's a lot of details there on the gas procurement side, Jeremy, that we can't share. I mean that's proprietary information. That's part of the project. Those are contractual provisions between Southern Natural and all of the off takers.

Suffice it to say the existing Southern Natural Pipe, our entities between our electric generation fleet and Atlanta Gas Light and the marketers in Georgia represent 50% of the offtake of the existing pipe. And so I don't think it's unreasonable that with an expansion project that we have the opportunity to be a pretty large participant as well. As far as the timing of the project, again, I think all these details are probably out there in Kinder Morgan's materials. But just think about it essentially as a project that culminates sometime at the very back end of our forecast or late this decade.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Paul Fremont, Ladenburg Thalmann.

Southern (SO) Q3 2024 Earnings Call Transcript

Company Participants