With a combined revenue of $21 trillion and $2.1 trillion in profits, the 2026 Fortune 500 is the definitive list of America's largest companies.

Fortune 500

AI is a major force shaping this year’s list—but it’s far from the only story.

World's Most Admired Companies

Almost $20 trillion in revenue—and a record-breaking $1.87 trillion in profits. Introducing the 2025 Fortune 500, the definitive list of the biggest companies in America.

Leaders in all industries rely more than ever on Big Tech—and appreciate the giants that deliver, at scale, without drama.

Industries included in the sector are electrical equipment and industrial machinery.

Fortune Sector Leaders: Industrials

The Fortune 500, in its 70th year in 2024, ranks the biggest U.S. companies by revenue.

The 25th Fortune World’s Most Admired Companies list suggests that tech giants’ peers respect them as much as ever.

The Fortune 500, in its 69th year in 2023, ranks the biggest U.S. companies by revenue.

Just as it dominates our economy, Big Tech now dominates Fortune’s annual ranking of corporate reputation.

This year’s Fortune 500 marks the 68th running of the list.

After a year in which humanity leaned more heavily than ever on tech giants, see which companies topped Fortune's ranking of corporate reputation.

This year’s Fortune 500 marks the 67th running of the list.

Oshkosh Corporation builds specialty and military-style vehicles and other technology. If you own a four-wheel-drive vehicle, give a nod to Oshkosh; the company patented the four-wheel drive system in 1917.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 66th running of the list.

F500-2020-377-Oshkosh

The manufacturer of specialty vehicles and vehicle bodies supplies heavy-duty equipment to customers including the U.S. military, fire departments, and municipal waste haulers.

Here are the World's Most Admired Companies for 2019 as ranked in their industries. See who made the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 65th running of the list.

Here are the World's Most Admired Companies for 2018 as ranked in their industries. See who made the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 64th running of the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 63rd running of the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 62nd running of the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 61st running of the list. Wal-Mart claims the top spot again. See who made the list.

Wal-Mart stayed on top as its sales crept closer to half-a-trillion dollars. Apple moved into the top five. And UnitedHealth Group continued its steady climb. 

Sector

Industry

Current All-Star Rank

Previous All-Star Rank

Industry Rank

Previous Industry Rank

Overall Score

Innovation

People Management

Use of Corporate Assets

Social Responsibility

Quality of Management

Financial Soundness

Long-Term Investment Value

Quality of Products/Services

Global Competitiveness

Key Financials (last Fiscal Year)

Revenues ($M)

Profits ($M)

Assets ($M)

Total Stockholder Equity ($M)

Profit Ratios

Profit as % of Revenues

Profits as % of Assets

Profits as % of Stockholder Equity

Earnings Per Share (last Fiscal Year)

Earnings Per Share ($)

EPS % Change (from prior fiscal year)

EPS % Change (5 year annual rate)

EPS % Change (10 year annual rate)

Total Return

Total Return to Investors (last year)

Total Return to Investors (5 year, annualized)

Total Return to Investors (10 year, annualized)

Oshkosh Corporation designs and manufactures specialty vehicles and vehicle bodies for defense, fire and emergency, construction, and commercial applications. Its products include tactical wheeled vehicles, aerial work platforms, and refuse collection trucks. The company serves customers in both public and private sectors, including military organizations and municipalities. Oshkosh also offers support services and fleet management solutions.

Q2 2026

Q1 2026

Q4 2025

Q3 2025

Q2 2025

Q1 2025

Q4 2024

Oshkosh (OSK): Company Profile, Stock Price, News, Rankings

legacy

Oshkosh

oshkosh

Greetings, welcome to the Oshkosh Corporation's second quarter 2026 results conference call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. A brief question-and-answer session will follow the formal presentation. If anyone should require operator assistance during the conference, please press star zero on your telephone keypad. As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. It is now my pleasure to introduce your host, Pat Davidson, Senior Vice President of Investor Relations for Oshkosh Corporation. Thank you, sir. You may begin.

Good morning, thanks for joining us. Earlier today, we published our second quarter 2026 results. A copy of that release is available on our website at oshkoshcorp.com. Today's call is being webcast and is accompanied by a slide presentation, which includes a reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures that we will use during this call and is also available on our website. The audio replay and slide presentation will be available on our website for approximately 12 months. Please refer now to slide two of that presentation. Our remarks that follow, including answers to your questions, contain statements that we believe to be forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and other factors that could cause actual results to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.

These risks, factors include, among others, factors that we listed in our release this morning and matters that we have described in our most recent Form 10-K and other filings we make with the SEC, as well as matters noted at our Investor Day in June 2025. We disclaim any obligation to update these forward-looking statements, which may not be updated until our next quarterly earnings conference call, if at all. Our presenters today are John Pfeifer, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Matt Field, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Please turn to slide three, I'll turn it over to you, John.

Good morning, everyone, thank you for joining us today. In the second quarter, we delivered consolidated sales of $2.9 billion and adjusted earnings per share of $2.87. We continue to benefit from growth in our access segment with strong order intake of $1.5 billion. Additionally, we have robust backlogs at our transport and vocational segments, we're focused on increasing production, which is foundational to delivering our 2028 goals. We are building momentum and remain confident in our ability to deliver on our Investor Day targets. Within our vocational segment, we are continuing actions to modernize our fire truck manufacturing and expand production to better serve strong customer demand and support long-term growth. Over the past quarter, we have implemented production changes to improve throughput.

To support these changes, we are implementing new in-plant material flow processes that shift from reliance on individuals and experience to standardized modern process flows that will support our continued transformation to high-flow production lines. As a result of these changes, we expect to produce and ship fewer fire trucks this year than we previously planned. However, the work we are doing positions us well for 2027 and 2028. As a result of our revised expectations for production this year, we now expect full-year adjusted earnings per share in the range of $11. Across the company, we continue to hear a common theme from customers who are looking for solutions that are safe, intuitive, productive, and maximize fleet uptime.

We are investing in AI-enabled technologies, autonomy, and connectivity that are shaping the airport of the future, the job site of the future, the neighborhood of the future, and the battlefield of the future. Please turn to slide five, we'll continue to review some highlights since our last call. As expected, our access segment delivered double-digit operating income margins with strong Q2 sales in a dynamic environment. We now expect full-year access segment revenue to grow compared to 2025, an improvement from our original expectation for a modest decline. Large infrastructure investments and mega projects remain important sources of demand, our newest products, including micro-sized scissor lift and ClearSky Smart Fleet connected technologies, continue to resonate with customers. We remain focused on managing the business with discipline, improving price-cost dynamics, driving operational productivity, and innovating our products and services.

These innovations will drive the job site of the future, where we see tremendous promise in bringing autonomous AI-enabled solutions to construction sites. Orders in the quarter were strong at $1.5 billion, resulting in a book-to-bill ratio of 1.1. We enter the second half of the year with good visibility, supported by a $2 billion backlog at the end of the quarter. Mega projects are continuing to drive demand for our access equipment, we are working to ensure we have the inventory and production flexibility to support the demand. Turning to slide six in our vocational segment. Backlog and demand for fire apparatus and airport products provides excellent visibility and supports our investment in our manufacturing operations to drive long-term growth. We are making meaningful progress in modernizing our manufacturing operations, implementing the changes needed to improve material flow and assembly efficiency.

These initiatives represent a transformation of our manufacturing operations for fire trucks. While production throughput is improving more gradually than we initially expected in the near term, these steps remain the right actions to reduce lead times and better serve our customers. Demand for Oshkosh AeroTech remains strong as airports continue investing in expansion and modernization. Once again, order intake during the quarter was solid, particularly for passenger boarding bridges, with key wins in Chicago, Denver and Philadelphia. In addition, we continue to advance our vision for Airport of the Future, including testing an autonomous AI-enabled ground support robot at Grand Rapids Airport in the quarter. Refuse collection vehicle sales were lower than last year, as we previously discussed. Even amidst lower sales, the quality of our products has resulted in notable recent orders, including a significant order with the New York City Department of Sanitation.

Overall, we believe the long-term outlook for our vocational segment remains strong. Our backlog and market position continue to provide an excellent foundation for future growth, and we are confident in achieving our long-range targets. Please turn to slide seven. In the transport segment, we continue to ramp production of the Next Generation Delivery Vehicle. We are excited to see more of our vehicles serving postal carriers in communities across the country. The fleet has now surpassed 35 million miles, and feedback from both the United States Postal Service and its drivers remains positive, reinforcing the safety, productivity, and reliability benefits of the platform. Our defense business also continued to build momentum during the quarter. Participation at the Eurosatory Exhibition in France highlighted the growing interest we are seeing from both existing and potential customers.

As defense priorities continue to evolve globally, we believe Oshkosh is well positioned to leverage our engineering capabilities, manufacturing scale, and proven mobility platforms to pursue additional opportunities in both domestic and international markets. During the quarter, we received orders from the U.S. and international customers, including a $142 million order for the FMTV A2 program and a $92 million order supporting the United States Marine Corps ROGUE-Fires platform, which combines next generation autonomy with the protection, mobility, speed, and off-road capability Marines rely on in harsh environments. These awards reinforce the confidence our customers place in Oshkosh Defense while providing additional visibility beyond 2026 for these products. I'll hand it over to Matt to review our financial results and provide additional details on our outlook.

Thanks, John. Please turn to slide eight. Consolidated sales for the second quarter of $2.9 billion increased $183 million, or 6.7% compared to the same quarter last year. The increase primarily reflected improved sales volume and pricing. Adjusted operating income was $258 million, down from $313 million in the prior year, primarily due to unfavorable mix and higher manufacturing overhead costs, which in part continues to reflect our investments for future production, partially offset by higher sales volume. Free cash flow for the quarter was $348 million, a significant improvement compared to $49 million last year. Our strong free cash flow reflected continued discipline in managing working capital, particularly related to inventory, as well as higher customer advances. Our expectation for cash conversion remains strong for the year.

During the quarter, we repurchased approximately 667,000 shares of our stock for $92 million. Turning to our segment results on slide nine, Access second quarter sales of $1.4 billion were up 9.4% from last year. The increase was driven by higher sales volume and improved pricing. As John mentioned, demand is improving. We delivered a book-to-bill ratio of 1.1 during the quarter, more than double the second quarter last year, as robust Q2 orders followed strong activity in the first quarter. Access achieved a solid double-digit adjusted operating income margin of 11.3%, which was lower than last year, in part due to adverse product and customer mix. As expected, price cost dynamics also remained unfavorable compared with last year, primarily due to tariff costs.

As we've previously discussed, even though tariffs were announced in the second quarter last year, we did not see the cost impact until later in 2025. For the year, we still expect to be price cost neutral. Vocational sales of $967 million were relatively flat compared to last year as lower volume, primarily refuse and recycling vehicles, more than offset improved pricing. Fire truck shipments were roughly in line with last year. Despite lower volume, the vocational segment delivered an adjusted operating income margin of 13.5% as adverse sales mix and higher manufacturing overhead costs, including our investments in Pierce facilities, were partially offset by favorable price cost dynamics. Transport segment sales increased $57 million or 12% to $536 million in the quarter, primarily due to higher sales volume. Delivery vehicle revenue grew by $155 million-$262 million, more than offsetting the decrease in defense volume.

Delivery represented nearly half of transport segment sales during the quarter. Delivery revenue grew more than 20% sequentially compared to the first quarter of 2026. As expected, defense revenue was lower than last year. As a reminder, in the second quarter of 2025, we were still building domestic JLTVs with the last units built in May 2025. Transport segment operating income was $16 million, down $2 million compared with last year, reflecting adverse mix as well as higher warranty and manufacturing overhead costs, which were partially offset by a favorable one-time item totaling $17 million related to the NGDV program. We expect transport operating margin to grow in the back half of the year as we continue to transition out of past fixed price contracts, ramp up NGDV production and expect to receive an additional NGDV order. Turning to our expectations for 2026 on slide 10.

As John mentioned earlier, we are updating our outlook with full year adjusted EPS now expected to be in the range of $11. While our outlook for access demand is improving, as we have stated, the more moderate pace of improvement for firetruck throughput has reduced our expectations by approximately $0.50. As we execute firetruck production plans, anticipate receiving an additional order for NGDVs, increase NGDV production and build on revised defense contracts, we expect that our results in Q4 will be stronger than Q3. We expect that this Q4 momentum carries forward into 2027 and beyond as we work towards our 2028 targets. We still expect free cash flow of $550 million-$650 million unchanged from our prior guidance. With that, I'll turn it back over to John for some closing comments.

Across Oshkosh, we continue to invest in technologies that make a difference to the everyday hero doing essential work in communities and create enduring value for customers. Whether through connected equipment, autonomy, artificial intelligence or electrification, we believe our innovate serve advance strategy continues to position Oshkosh to shape the future of job sites, airports, neighborhoods and battlefields of the future. To reiterate, we remain confident in our plans to achieve our 2028 financial targets. I'll turn it back to you, Pat, for the Q&A.

Thanks, John. I'd like to remind everyone to please limit your questions to one plus a follow-up. Please stay disciplined on your follow-up question. After the follow-up, we ask that you rejoin the queue if you have additional questions. Operator, please begin the Q&A session.

Thank you. We will now be conducting a question-and-answer session. If you would like to ask a question, please press star one on your telephone keypad. A confirmation tone will indicate your line is in the question queue. You may press star two if you would like to remove your question from the queue. For participants using speaker equipment, it may be necessary to pick up your handset before pressing the star keys. One moment please while we poll for questions. Thank you. Our first question comes from the line of David Raso with Evercore ISI. Please proceed with your question.

Hi, thank you. Trying to figure out the vocational, sounds like that $0.50 comment. Just to be clear, is there upside to access and vocational was taken down more than $0.50? Just making sure. It sounds like you obviously bumped up the total revenue. I just wanted to be clear because it kind of sounded like vocational was $0.50. I assume it's more than $0.50 and access has upside. I just wanted to clarify that.

Morning, David. Thanks for joining. Yeah, that's the right way to think about it fundamentally is, with the more moderate pace of production that more than offsets the upside in access, which was the revision to the guide.

Related to that, the Access upside. I know customer mix is important, price cost is important. How are you thinking about the margins and Access from previously? Just how much can we think of the incremental profitability from the higher volume? Thank you.

Sure. Over the year, that incrementality should improve as we improve our price cost dynamics. That's kind of the general way I would think about it.

Our next question comes from the line of Tami Zakaria with JPMorgan. Please proceed with your question.

Hi, good morning. Thank you so much. Question on access. Can you remind us where the industry access volumes you expect to be end of this year versus the prior peak levels? What I'm trying to understand is where do you expect the industry to end this year versus the prior peak?

First of all, good morning, Tami. Tough for me to say where the overall industry is going to end up this year. I can give you some context on where we are. The industry right now is being driven primarily by mega projects. Mega projects from infrastructure to data centers, which we all hear about every day, and many other big mega projects, which is really what's driving a lot of demand right now. For the most part, that's served by the big national rental companies because they've got the big fleets in order to serve it. It's a good thing. It's going to go on for a long time, as far as we can see right now. The private general or non-res construction segment is just plodding along. There's a lot of different segments in that, and that's a huge marketplace for us.

We expect that that will start to improve at some point in the future. Hard to call exactly when. Some metrics say it's going to improve by the end of the year, in the fourth quarter, or some say early 2027. That's even going to just boost the demand that we're seeing even further because right now it's just plodding along. Overall, we're seeing a really nice improving demand environment for access equipment.

Understood. That's very helpful color. I apologize if I missed it, but could you comment on the 3Q EPS expectation versus the $2.87 you did in 2Q? I'm trying to understand what 3Q might look like versus 4Q.

Yeah. As we said on the call, 4Q, we think will be high relative to our normal seasonality. That's really driven, as we both have on the slides and said on the script, driven by fire truck production, building under the new price contracts on defense NGDV production, and then the expectation for an NGDV order. All of that we expect in Q4.

Our next question comes from the line of Stephen Volkmann with Jefferies. Please proceed with your question.

I'm a bit of a slow learner. I apologize. I was going to ask you if we could dive into Access a little bit, and I'm trying to think about the two margin drivers that you talked about, the mix, and the price cost. Do those get sort of sequentially better each quarter? Or maybe not till 2027? I don't know. How should we think about those two mix and price cost drivers?

Difficult to say exactly on mix. As John talked about, it's not exactly clear when we'll see broad-based recovery outside of mega projects. That obviously affects customer mix. In terms of price cost, we would expect that to improve in part because once we have tariffs in the rearview mirror in terms of a year-over-year comp, that'll improve our year-over-year price costs. Also just through pricing activity as well as cost reductions as we've talked about on prior calls.

Great. John, on refuse cycle, is this kind of a peak, and we should expect a couple of years of something a little lower, or is this a lull in the action, as it were?

Well, Steve, the refuse business has been down in 2026. We said it was going to be down. It has actually been down. In some industrial sectors, we're seeing customers remain cautious on CapEx until they see a little bit more certainty on the macroeconomic future. That's certainly been the case with customers in the refuse business. The good news is that overall, it's a good market. Fleets remain aged, and we all know that the generation of refuse and recycling remains unchanged. We certainly expect that this business, even though it's been a little bit down in 2026, is going to return to a little bit more normal state, maybe as we get into 2027.

Our next question comes from the line of Jamie Cook with Truist Securities. Please proceed with your question.

Hi. Good morning. Sorry, just a couple of follow-ups. Matt, again, on the third quarter versus the fourth quarter, given the items that you called out that are heavily fourth quarter weighted, it sounds like Q3 could potentially be flat to down relative to last year. I'm just wondering if that's the right way to think about it. My second question is within transport. I think before you were saying that revenues of about $2.5 billion, which I'm assuming that's still the same, given you didn't really clarify that. It just implies a pretty healthy ramp. Is that still the right way to think about it? And just your confidence on when we get the NGDV award and how material that is to the guide for the year. Thank you.

Hey, Jamie. Roughly, I think that's the right way to think about it in broad frameworks. In terms of the order, we're assuming that's in Q4. I do that just because that's when the fiscal years are for the government. It could be Q3, but for planning purposes, we're assuming Q4. We have ongoing dialogues with the USPS to make sure we have our supply chain ready to support their production.

Okay. To the first comment, EPS in the third quarter could be flat to down. You're confirming that?

I think that's the right way to think about it with strong Q4 and where we are in our production cycle.

Okay. transport's still $2.5 billion for the year.

Our next question comes from the line of Jerry Revich with Wells Fargo. Please proceed with your question.

Yes. Hi, good morning, everybody. I want to ask John, just on your comment on being on track for 2028 targets, for aerial platforms in particular, can you just talk about how much of a step forward you folks expect to take in 2027 to bridge the gap we're running now versus the 2028 targets and your level of confidence on price cost to get there?

Yeah. I'll provide some commentary on the market and where we think it's headed. We feel really good about where the access market is right now. We certainly feel better today than we did in January, as you know. That's what we've been talking about. We also feel really good about where it's headed, and there's kind of two things happening. Number one, I always say pay attention to our backlog. Backlog is building. That's good, of course. I always say we got to pay attention to utilization rates, equipment in the market, and how much is it utilized. The utilization rates are really, really strong. That's both our own data as well as what our customers are telling us. You've seen publicly traded customers already report really strong utilization. You got utilization improving and really healthy. We've got backlogs that are building.

Couple that with the fact that the boom category is still aged. We have need for growth in boom equipment in the market, and we have aged boom equipment, so there's continued need to replace boom equipment. Those are all really healthy signs that point towards a strong recovery in the market. We think that that goes at least through 2028 and beyond with all the activity. Mega projects are not going to slow down. We have, again, the private non-res market that right now is kind of muddling along, but there's a lot of signs saying that at some point in the near future, that's going to pick up as well. Just the context here, we feel like we're in a good spot.

We've done a lot of really strong work to position our manufacturing plants as well to be able to serve the market in the recovery that we're in.

Agreed on the recovery for sure. I'm just wondering your level of confidence on the ability to push price. It feels like you might need something like a mid-single digit type price increases given the timing of tariffs and refunds this year and just general inflation. John, I'm wondering, obviously it's early for 2027 orders, but what's your level of confidence on being able to price ahead of inflation given the backdrop you described?

Well, the short answer is we're confident that we can do that. I'll give you a little bit more context. We've been working for the last year on positioning our cost in the context of geopolitical tariff environments, really making sure that we're responding to that. We do a lot of tariff engineering. We think that we're going to get the fruits of that labor as the market continues to recover. We always try to pay attention to cost first. How do we minimize the cost impact to our customer? That's always job one. We will have to pass some of it on, and we have done some of that, and we're confident that because we're so intensely focused on the cost side, that as we pass along what we need to customers, that'll be accepted. We're confident that we'll continue to do that.

I think that history has shown that we have the ability to do that.

Our next question comes from the line of Mig Dobre with Baird. Please proceed with your question.

Hey, good morning, guys. It's Joe Grabowski on for Mig this morning.

Good morning. My first question, you mentioned the fire truck shipments were roughly in line with last year, and you're making moves to improve the production flow. When do you think you'll start to see the benefits of those improvements that you're working on right now? I know you mentioned 2027, 2028, but is there a chance that we'll start to see some of the benefits later in this year, or when do you think those will come through?

You should start to see it in the second half of this year for sure. I'll give you a little context. This is the most complex product that we produce, the municipal fire truck. We're really transforming how we make it. We say we're going from bay build to high flow production lines, which is a big transformation in the manufacturing operations, and we're moving through that transition right now. We're really confident in the steps that we're taking. We've got the absolute best people on it. That includes expertise from third parties where we need it. We have done this before. We did it at McNeilus, and I could give you other examples beyond that, which were all very, very successful. What it's going to result in is a really resilient production flow for fire trucks where we can sprint.

Right now we need to be sprinting because we got huge backlogs. When we're in normal sort of steady state production, we'll be super efficient. We feel really good about what we're doing.

Got it. Okay. Thank you for that update. My follow-up question, if you could just update us on any impact on your facilities from the severe weather in the Appleton area yesterday.

It was a tough event for this area. Luckily, we came out pretty good. We had people impacted in terms of homes damaged and things like that. Of the 7,000 people we have up here, we had one that was injured, so we're paying very close attention to that person. Operations are intact. Couple of power outages here and there. Nothing material that would concern business performance.

Our next question comes from the line of Angel Castillo with Morgan Stanley. Please proceed with your question.

Hi, good morning, and thanks for taking my question. I just wanted to go back to the fiscal year, I guess, 2026 bridge. I just wanted to understand it a little bit better. If you could provide any more color. Maybe just quantifying, I guess, how much more kind of upside you see from an access perspective in terms of the guide on the APS front. As we think about the segments, I guess transport had a $16.6 million one-time item. Was that contemplated in the guide, or is that kind of an incremental factor that maybe doesn't repeat and would, I guess, imply a little bit more weakness in vocational? Just layering on top of that, anything in terms of refunds or tariffs that was or wasn't included in the guidance.

Can you just kind of quantify that as we think about 2Q and the remaining quarters?

You packed a lot into that question there, Angel.

I might need to come back to you for some of your follow-ups. You got a lot in there. All those things were contemplated in the quarter as we were looking for both the guide and the year. Whether they happened in the second quarter in some cases or later in the year, were up for debate. Generally speaking, they were all contemplated. What else did you have questions on specifically in that? You packed so much into that question that generally speaking, the one-timers were kind of understood at the beginning of the quarter.

Got it. I guess I just wanted to understand, those one-time items and refunds were already contemplated, I think is what you're saying. Just if you could size the refunds was, I guess the initial question.

Yeah. On tariffs, remember what we talked about last quarter is we felt where we were with the Section 232 and other elements relative to our IEEPA refunds, we were balanced for the year. We still feel that that's roughly the case. In the quarter, we had about $40 million-$50 million net impact on tariffs, all in line with our expectations for the full year. As we talked about last quarter, we had first quarter about $13 million recovery. That increased. Some of it was our direct flow through to Q2. Some of that was customer, that increased to call it roughly $20 million for the quarter. All the numbers roughly in line with where we were expecting last quarter. Not a lot of surprises.

Got it. Thank you. Then maybe just one on 3Q. I know you didn't provide a specific number, but you talked about kind of flat to down sequentially. Can you just talk about that at the segment level? Where would you kind of anticipate the potential to increase production, deliver more units versus where is it more about just more price cost and mix factors and just trying to understand that and particularly as we go into the fourth quarter, kind of that ramp.

Yeah. Angel, just to clarify, Tami's question was on a year-over-year basis, not on a sequential basis. In terms of Q3, Q4 ramp, again, it's fire truck production as John mentioned, that's sequential Q3 and then into Q4. In Q4, we get into NGDV production, the additional order. As well as we move through the year, we build more on the new revised price contracts in defense.

Our next question comes from the line of Steven Fisher with UBS. Please proceed with your question.

Thanks. Good morning. You guys had cited higher warranty costs in the transport segment. To what extent is that related to the NGDV, and can you quantify it and maybe frame the potential for that to improve over time? I guess the bigger picture question here also is just on the transport margins. I think you talked to Jerry about 28 in Access, but just curious how confident we can be at this point that this transport segment still has double-digit margin potential.

Yeah, Steve, thanks for the question. First of all, let me just clarify the warranty was a one time. It was on a defense program. It was an engine-related issue. One time, that's all I'll say about it. I don't think it warrants more comment. The defense business, though, it's getting to a point where we're getting new contract pricing on really important programs. We have NGDV getting to full rate production. The expectation with us and our customer, the United States Postal Service, there'll be yet another order in the second half of the year, likely in the fourth quarter. That gives us the ability to understand what their go-forward mix is, and we can prime the supply chain and make sure that we can supply efficiently. That's part of the expectation for the fourth quarter.

That contract pricing, full rate production on NGDVs and an order coming in with 606 accounting, that's what takes it to a much better margin level.

Okay. That's helpful. Can you talk about some of the positive price versus cost dynamics within vocational? Was that all price that was already in backlog, or were you able to capture additional cost recovery as costs have been rising in general?

Primarily that pricing is in backlog. Most of it is already defined. There are a couple markets where we have shorter lead times that have pricing here and there, but for the most part, that's all in backlog.

Our next question comes from the line of Chad Dillard with Bernstein. Please proceed with your question.

Hey, good morning, guys. Question for you on your delivery business. Hey, good morning. First of all, can you give a little bit more color on the orders and backlog trends in the quarter for delivery? Secondly, I think it's hitting in the fourth quarter, but can you size the cumulative hedge adjustment that's embedded in your guidance?

In the quarter, we're working off the large order that we received initially, plus a supplemental order to that. We didn't have any orders in the quarter. We expect an order in the fourth quarter. We continue to work off the order and mix that we've already received. This is a fantastic program for us and for the United States Postal Service. Really enhances the USPS's ability to deliver e-commerce efficiently and effectively. As I said on the prepared remarks, they're coming to every neighborhood around you. If you haven't seen one yet, you will probably in the very near future. We feel great about the program. Again, the order that we expect to receive in the second half is part of our guidance in the second half.

Got it. Okay. What's the new shape of the fire truck capacity ramp? When do you expect to hit full rate production? Can you just frame what that looks like versus your production rates today?

We expect this year it'll be about a 10% increase, and that's a material amount of additional fire trucks coming off the line. In total, we're expecting to get to a 25%-30% production rate increase. We expect to be increasing production in Q3, yet again in Q4, and as we go through 2027. That's all really, really important. It's why we talk so much about moving to transformational high flow production lines that are much more efficient and allow us to sprint more, because we need more fire trucks right now, but they'll allow us to be really efficient in the future in steady state production environments. We're continuing to drive more output on our fire truck production capabilities.

Our next question comes from the line of Kyle Menges with Citi. Please proceed with your question.

Good morning, and thanks for taking my questions. Maybe just digging into Vocational a little bit more and the fire truck production ramp. I'm just curious, what have been some of the main challenges to hitting the production targets, and just your confidence level in those challenges alleviating over time?

Yeah. I hit on it a little bit in my prepared remarks. It's about material flow, right? Because when you go to a bay build to a more high flow production environment with different workstations and you're organizing production very differently, this is a very complicated vehicle. There's thousands and thousands of parts, both from our internal component plants as well as our many great suppliers that have to come together at the right time and at the right place. When you re-engineer all of that, we know what we're doing. We have done this before. We're not reinventing anything here. We have to go through a lot of very methodical work and make sure that it's right to get to the level of production that we expect. Sometimes when you're in the near term, it's hard to predict the next week what you're going to do.

Oshkosh (OSK) Q2 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

Company Participants