With a combined revenue of $21 trillion and $2.1 trillion in profits, the 2026 Fortune 500 is the definitive list of America's largest companies.

Fortune 500

Almost $20 trillion in revenue—and a record-breaking $1.87 trillion in profits. Introducing the 2025 Fortune 500, the definitive list of the biggest companies in America.

Industries included in the sector are beverages, food consumer products, and food production.

Fortune Sector Leaders: Food, Beverages, and Tobacco

The Fortune 500, in its 70th year in 2024, ranks the biggest U.S. companies by revenue.

The Fortune 500, in its 69th year in 2023, ranks the biggest U.S. companies by revenue.

This year’s Fortune 500 marks the 68th running of the list.

This year’s Fortune 500 marks the 67th running of the list.

F500-2021-314-Molson Coors Beverage

Formed in 2005 through the merger of Molson of Canada, and the U.S.-based Coors, the drink and brewing company is one of the largest in the world, selling familiar brands such as Blue Moon, Miller Light, and Topo Chico Hard Seltzer.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 66th running of the list.

F500-2020-298-Molson-Coors-Beverage

The Chicago brewing company is among the world's largest and is behind beer brands such as Blue Moon, Miller High Life, and Leinenkugel's—not to mention Molson and Coors—as well as the cider brand Crispin.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 65th running of the list.

Everybody loves an up-and-comer: 2019's top three-year performers in revenues, profits, and stock returns.

100 Fastest-Growing Companies

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 64th running of the list.

Everybody loves an up-and-comer: 2018's top three-year performers in revenues, profits, and stock returns.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 63rd running of the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 62nd running of the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 61st running of the list. Wal-Mart claims the top spot again. See who made the list.

Wal-Mart stayed on top as its sales crept closer to half-a-trillion dollars. Apple moved into the top five. And UnitedHealth Group continued its steady climb. 

Fastest-growing Companies

Industry

Sector

Current Streak

Years on List

Website

Country

Headquarters

Ticker

Revenue, Net Income

Revenue past four quarters ($M)

Net Income past four quarters ($M)

Market Value ($M)

Growth Rates And Ranks

Revenue 3 Yr Growth Rank

Revenue 3 Yr Annual Growth Rate

EPS 3 Yr Growth Rank

EPS 3 Yr Annual Growth Rate

Total Return 3 Yr Rank

Total Return 3 Yr Annual Rate

Beat S&P 500 3 Yr Return

Key Financials (last Fiscal Year)

Revenues ($M)

Profits ($M)

Assets ($M)

Total Stockholder Equity ($M)

Profit Ratios

Profit as % of Revenues

Profits as % of Assets

Profits as % of Stockholder Equity

Earnings Per Share (last Fiscal Year)

Earnings Per Share ($)

EPS % Change (from prior fiscal year)

EPS % Change (5 year annual rate)

EPS % Change (10 year annual rate)

Total Return

Total Return to Investors (last year)

Total Return to Investors (5 year, annualized)

Total Return to Investors (10 year, annualized)

Molson Coors Beverage Company manufactures, markets, and sells beer and other malt beverage products across the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and the Asia Pacific. The company’s portfolio includes a range of flavored malt beverages, hard seltzers, craft beers, spirits, and ready-to-drink beverages. Its products are offered under a variety of brands, including Blue Moon, Coors Light, Miller Lite, Carling, and Staropramen, as well as premium and economy brands. Molson Coors serves a diverse customer base through multiple channels and continues to expand its offerings to meet evolving consumer preferences.

Q2 2026

Q1 2026

Q4 2025 & Consumer Analyst Group of New York Conference (CAGNY) 2026

Q3 2025

Q2 2025

Q1 2025

Q4 2024

Molson Coors Beverage (TAP): Company Profile, Stock Price, News, Rankings

legacy

Molson Coors Beverage

molson coors beverage

Good morning, and welcome to the Molson Coors Beverage Company's First Quarter Fiscal Year twenty twenty five Earnings Conference Call. With that, I'll hand it over to Tracy Mangini, Vice President, Investor Relations.

Thank you, operator, and hello, everyone. Following prepared remarks today, we look forward to taking your questions. In an effort to address as many questions as possible, we ask that you limit yourself to one question. If you have technical questions on the quarter, please reach out to the IR team. Also, I encourage you to review our earnings release and earnings slides, which are posted on the IR section of our website and provide detailed financial and operational metrics.

Today's discussion includes forward looking statements. Actual results or trends could differ materially from our forecast. For more information, please refer to our risk factors discussed in our most recent filings with the SEC. We assume no obligation to update forward looking statements, except as required by applicable law. The definitions of or reconciliations for any non U.

S. GAAP measures are included in our earnings release. Unless otherwise indicated, all financial results we discuss are versus the comparable prior year period and are in U. S. Dollars.

With the exception of earnings per share, all financial metrics are in constant currency when referencing percentage changes from the prior year period. Also, share data references are sourced from Surcana in The U. S. And from Beer Canada indicated. Further in our remarks today, we will reference underlying pretax income, which equates to underlying income before income taxes and underlying earnings per share, which equates to underlying diluted earnings per share as defined in our earnings release.

Thank you, Tracy. Hello, everybody, and thank you for joining the call. Like for so many of our peers in Staples, it certainly was a challenging first quarter. The global macroeconomic environment is volatile due to uncertainty around the effects of geopolitical events and global trade policy, including the impacts on economic growth, consumer confidence and expectations around inflation and currencies. These shifts have pressured consumption trends as the consumer faces a high level of uncertainty and the beer industry has not been immune to these macro changes.

Fortunately, while we are a global business, our beers and beverages are generally made in the markets in which they are sold, meaning the vast majority of our brands sold in The U. S. Are made in The U. S. With U.

S. Ingredients. The same is true of our Canadian business. So from that perspective, we believe that we are one of the better positioned businesses in our category. Adding to the dynamics in the quarter, we had several expected shipment headwinds as well as one time transition and integration fees related to Fever Tree.

And given that this all occurred in our typically lowest revenue quarter of the year, there was a more pronounced impact on our quarterly results. Now we recognize that these macro driven uncertainties persist and it's unclear for how long. As we discuss the details around the performance in the quarter, I want to emphasize that there have been no changes in our belief in the continued strengthening of our core brands and in our long term growth algorithm. The continued premiumization of our portfolio, ability to maintain unprecedented U. S.

Shelf space gains and our recent investments in Fever Tree give us increased confidence in our long term growth journey. But we do recognize the macro environment is impacting our performance in the near term. So we are focusing on controlling what we can control. We are taking actions to best ensure that we can navigate and mitigate the short term challenges while continuing to support the medium and long term health and growth objectives of the company. This means executing our strategy to further strengthen our core power brands and premiumize our business.

And we have strong growth commercial plans globally as we head into the peak season, which is still ahead of us. It means taking a deeper look at near term non business critical discretionary cost saving opportunities to help protect profitability. And it means adjusting our twenty twenty five capital expenditure plans to best ensure we are utilizing our strong annual free cash flow in the most prudent ways given the current environment. This entails refining capital investments to focus on our highest priority growth and productivity initiatives, while continuing to return cash to shareholders. Now while these mitigation efforts are helpful, the magnitude of the impacts of the macroeconomic environment in the industry has been much greater so far this year than we had expected.

For example, the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment Index fell by nearly 20 percentage points since the beginning of the year and GDP turned negative for the first quarter. Amid these pressures on the macro and consumer environment, we are updating our guidance for the full year and we now expect a low single digit net sales revenue decline on a constant currency basis as compared to low single digit growth previously, a low single digit underlying pretax income decline on a constant currency basis as compared to mid single digit growth previously, and a low single digit underlying earnings per share growth as compared to high single digit growth previously. However, we are reaffirming our underlying free cash flow guidance of $1,300,000,000 plus or minus 10%. Now, Tracy will touch more on the guidance drivers shortly, but now let's take a moment to discuss the quarter. Consolidated net sales revenue was down 10.4%, underlying pretax income was down 49.5 and underlying earnings per share was down 47.4%.

The top line performance was meaningfully impacted by volume performance, particularly in The U. S. U. S. Financial volume was down 15.7% and this lagged U.

S. Brand volume, which was down 8.8%. As I mentioned, the unexpected macroeconomic pressures on consumer consumption behavior were a big driver of our results. However, there were several expected headwinds in the quarter that contributed to the volume performance. We were cycling significantly higher demand in the first quarter of last year when STRs were up 5.8%.

There was also one less trading day in the first quarter this year, which adversely impacted The U. S. Brand volume trend by 140 basis points. There were also shipment timing dynamics. In the first quarter of twenty twenty four, we deliberately built inventory as we prepared for the possible strike at our Fort Worth brewery, which as you know became a reality.

And as a result, STWs outpaced STRs by over seven and fifty thousand hectoliters. In the first quarter of this year, STWs outpaced STRs by only 200,000 hectoliters. This had a nearly 500 basis point negative impact on U. S. Financial volume in the quarter.

Further, as we expected, we cycled a combined approximate five and ninety thousand hectoliters of contract brewing volume for PEPPs in The U. S. And Labatt in Canada in the first quarter of twenty twenty four. This contract brewing volume, which related to agreement that terminated at the end of twenty twenty four, had a negative four percentage point impact on Americas' financial volume for the quarter. Again, while the exit of this contract brewing is a temporary volume headwind, we expect to have a positive impact in 2025 and beyond on mix, margin and brewery network effectiveness.

In fact, net sales revenue per hectoliter in The Americas was up 4.8%. In addition to favorable net pricing growth, it was driven by mix benefits, which largely resulted from the exit of this contract brewing volume. It also benefited from positive brand mix led by the addition of Fever Tree in The U. S, which is already showing early positive signs in our investment thesis and its long term impact on our business. In EMEA and APAC, our financial volume was down 9.7% due to soft industry demand across our regions and the heightened competitive landscape.

However, this was partly offset by net sales revenue per hectoliter growth of 5.4% driven by favorable sales mix, including high effective brand volume and continued premiumization and increased pricing. From a consolidated earnings perspective, we continue to closely manage costs while maintaining strong commercial support for our brands globally. However, lower volumes, volume deleverage, higher input costs and one time Fever Tree transition and integration fees of approximately $30,000,000 negatively impacted bottom line results. Our underlying free cash flow was negative $265,000,000 The first quarter is typically a cash used quarter and our smallest quarter of the year in terms of revenue and profit. So, we invested $88,000,000 for an 8.5 equity stake in Fever Tree Drinks PLC and returned nearly $160,000,000 to shareholders through a higher quarterly dividend as well as ongoing share repurchases.

Despite a volatile quarter, we continue to view our valuation as compelling given our belief in our business and in our long term growth algorithm. In fact, for the first six quarters since the share repurchase program was announced, we had already executed over 40% of this up to five year program, which if you straight line the number would have us at only 30%. And this belief comes from our commitment to our strategy and our ability to execute it. Through continued brand support and investments in our capabilities and partnerships, we are making progress in advancing our strategic priorities. I'll start with our core power brands.

In The U. S, Coors Light, Miller Lite and Coors Banquet have combined 15.4 volume share as compared to 13.5 in the first quarter of twenty twenty three. Said differently, these brands combined were up 1.9 share points since the first quarter of twenty twenty three, continuing to demonstrate that the step change improvement in volume share performance is sticky. Please refer to slide 18 in our earnings deck, which highlights our strong and sustained share performance. And very importantly, have retained the collective unprecedented U.

S. Shelf space gains for our core portfolio, which we achieved last spring. All this reflects the ongoing strength and resilience of these brands. Coors Banquet's momentum continued to accelerate with brand volume up double digits and growing industry share for the fifteenth consecutive quarter. And this is no small brand.

Banquet is our third largest revenue brand in The U. S. In fact, it remains the fastest growing top 15 brand in The U. S. On a volume percentage growth basis.

And retailers certainly recognize this as evidenced by the 20% distribution gains in the quarter with growing distribution across every channel. And we expect the brand's strong momentum to continue based on the distribution gains that we are seeing with spring resets. And still, Banquet has only half of the outlet's buying compared to Kurz LUT and its awareness is significantly below those of other big beer brands. So, we are investing to unlock the big opportunity that lies ahead and we see no reason Vanquid can't ultimately become a top 10 U. S.

Brand. In Canada, Coors Light remains the number one light beer in the industry, while the Molson family of brands gained volume share again this quarter, with gains accelerating in the quarter for this brand with deep Canadian roots. This performance has helped us to drive eight consecutive quarters of share growth despite the challenging industry backdrop. In EMEA and APAC, a number of our core power brands are leaders in their respective markets. Harling remains a top lager in The UK with strong brand equity among its core drinkers in the highly competitive UK beer market.

And we have continued to take a value over volume approach, which is weighed on volume performance. In Central And Eastern Europe, Ojusco in Croatia maintained its position as the segment leader and continued to increase value segment share on a rolling 12 basis, while Karimant in Romania, which launched last year and has had strong trials, continued to gain value share of segment in the quarter. This has been despite industry softness in the region related to escalating global political and economic tensions. Turning to our premiumization priority for both beer and Beyond Beer. In The Americas, Canada continued to premiumize driven by the ongoing success of Miller Lite, which is the fastest growing major beer brand in this market on a percentage basis, as well as by our flavor portfolio.

We are one of only two major brewers growing share of flavor in Canada. In The U. S, many of our premiumization plans for this year are just getting started as we head into peak season. In beer, the Bloomin brand family held share of industry through February, continuing the share stabilization trends we saw in the second half of last year. In March, Bloomin' Belgian White was temporarily negatively impacted as we converted from 15 packs to 12 packs to align with broader consumer preferences and given the benefits related to margin, supply chain efficiency and packaging consistency.

And the positive momentum behind our newer innovation Blue Moon non alk has continued gaining over a $0.5 share in the non alk beer segment in the quarter. Turning now to Peroni. The plans we've been talking about for a while now are just starting to kick off. As a reminder, with onshore production, we have unlocked meaningful cost savings, which we intend to deploy towards increased distribution and awareness to drive scale and margin for this brand. Through our strong commercial programs, along with improved continuity of supply and new pack sizes, we are securing more on premise placements and expanding our presence at retail with placements up nearly 50% in chain.

And while it's early days, ultimately, we expect Peroni can rival the size of other major European imports in The U. S. Over time. In Beyond Beer, which is an important part of our premiumization plans, non alk is a key focus area. It's part of our strategic ambition to build a total beverage portfolio for a wide range of consumer preferences across both traditional alcohol and non alcohol occasions.

It provides us with the opportunity to capture more occasions, particularly among younger legal drinking age Gen Z consumers. And we are investing behind the growing areas in non alk where we believe we have a right to win. Our approach in non alk is multi pronged. Within Beyond Beer, it includes pure players like ZOA, alcohol adjacent products like Fever Tree and alcohol replacements like Naked Life. Last October, we increased our equity stake in Zoho to a majority position.

By leading the entirety of the brand's marketing, retail and direct to consumer sales development and leveraging the strength of our network, we believe we can drive brand awareness and distribution. In fact, we have a significant number of new chain retailers coming on board with expanded distribution in several key accounts this spring. And we are continuing to build on our partnership with Dwayne Johnson with a new campaign that delivers an impactful functional message supported by a bigger media push and the early consumer sentiment reads on the campaign are promising. And then there is Fever Tree, the world's leading supplier of premium carbonated mixes with the number one tonic and the number one ginger beer in The U. S.

Since 2021. Through this strategic partnership, we have the exclusive commercialization rights to the Fever Tree brand in The U. S, its largest market. Fever Tree U. S.

Volume was approximately 500,000 hectoliters in 2024. So you can see it adds real scale to our non alk operations. This partnership has had an immediate impact as every single case we sell at Fever Tree is incremental to our business. And when you consider that Molson Coors has about 500,000 outlets buying as compared to Fever Tree, which has in the tens of thousands, we believe in the upside potential is substantial. And having just completed our distributor RFP process, we are pleased to share that Fever Tree's direct sales to distributors will shift to the Molson Coors and affiliated non alk beverage distributors.

The excitement and responses to the RFP from the distributors demonstrate their commitment to taking Tree to the next level. So, we intend to leverage the scale and strength of our distribution network combined with our marketing capabilities to accelerate Fever Tree's growth over time. Turning to EMEA and APAC, Madri's net brand revenue was up high single digits in the quarter, continuing to support premiumization in a business for which net brand revenue is already more than half above premium. This four year old innovation is already a top 10 brand for us globally and we see significant runway ahead. In addition to its strong performance in its initial market of The UK and a very successful launch in Bulgaria last year, we just added MAPRI to our portfolio in Romania in March.

Our deliberate expansion of this brand is not just geographic. In March, we launched Mitri zero point zero in The UK to capitalize on the rapidly growing non alf beer segment in the market. Now before I pass it to Tracy, I'll conclude by saying that these are dynamic and uncertain times. So we are taking steps to protect our profitability and free cash flow while continuing to execute our strategic initiatives which support our long term growth objectives. We remain committed to supporting the health of our core power brands globally.

We have strong plans to premiumize our global portfolio, building on successes in EMEA and APAC and Canada and executing targeted programs in The U. S. We expect to build on and leverage our capabilities across our organization that support premiumization and focused innovation, supply chain efficiencies and commercial effectiveness. And we intend to utilize our greatly enhanced financial flexibility to prudently invest in our business and return cash to shareholders. Our company through its various iterations has navigated volatile times for more than a century.

And by being proactive and adaptive, we have often emerged even stronger. We remain focused on what we can control, taking actions to help mitigate near term challenges, while continuing to invest in our business and brands in order to achieve our growth algorithm over the long term. And with that, I will pass it to Tracey.

Thank you, Gavin. Our work over the last several years has greatly improved the efficiency of our business from supply chain to commercial operations. These efforts have helped to drive an increase in margins over the last two years and support the further expansion opportunity that underpins our long term growth algorithm. There are multiple drivers that impact our margins. They include pricing, mix, input costs, volume leverage and cost savings, and the impact of those drivers vary by quarter.

In the first quarter, underlying cost of goods sold per hectoliter increased 6.1%. This was mainly due to volume deleverage given The U. S. Shipment trends Gavin discussed. In the first quarter, volume deleverage negatively impacted underlying cost of goods sold per hectoliter by four twenty basis points, while in the prior year period volume leverage was 110 basis points benefit.

Mix also contributed, driving two twenty basis points of the increase in underlying cost of goods sold per hectoliter. This was due to lower contract brewing volume in North America and premiumization in each business unit. But importantly, while these mix impacts increase cost of goods sold per hectoliter, they are favorable to margin. As for inflation, while we did experience moderated increases in input costs, This was largely offset by our ongoing cost savings and extensive hedging programs. MG and A was up modestly in the quarter as increases in G and A, which included one time transition and integration fees of approximately $30,000,000 related to the PEMATRI partnership, was partly offset by slightly lower marketing.

Turning to the balance sheet. At quarter end, net debt to underlying EBITDA was 2.47x. This was an increase from year end twenty twenty four as we normally see a sequential uptick in the first quarter given lower cash balances. This ratio is in alignment with our long term target of under 2.5 times and underscores the health of our balance sheet. This along with the highly cash generative nature of our business provides us more optionality in the ways that we invest in the business, be it through capital investments that drive productivity improvements or through bolt on M and A that support our strategic growth objectives.

Our recent investments in high growth non alf brands like Fever Tree are great examples. It also provides us with the opportunity to return even more cash to shareholders. We paid $99,000,000 in cash dividends and $60,000,000 to repurchase 1,000,000 shares in the quarter. Since the plan was announced in October 2023, we have repurchased 7.2% of our Class B shares outstanding. It's an up to five year two billion dollars plan and as Gavin mentioned, we have utilized over 40% in just the first six quarters.

And as we previously announced, in the first quarter we raised our quarterly dividend to €0.47 This was an increase of 6.8% and represented our fourth consecutive year of increases, clearly demonstrating our intention to sustainably increase our dividend. And given our share repurchases, we were able to raise the dividend without incurring aggregate higher dividend cash payments. And now I'll conclude with our financial outlook. First, there's a great deal of volatility in the global macro environment, resulting in uncertainty around the effects of geopolitical events and global trade policy, including the impacts on economic growth, consumer trends and currencies. These impacts are multifaceted and difficult to predict.

And while we have included in our guidance our best estimate of some of these factors, external drivers may significantly impact our actual results either up or down. Fortunately, as Gavin mentioned earlier, while we are a global business, our beers and beverages are generally made in the markets in which they are sold, meaning the vast majority of our brands sold in The U. S. Are made in The U. S.

With U. S. Ingredients, and that is the same for our Canadian business. We have a limited number of brands that we import into The U. S.

And their volumes are relatively small. For example, we import Molten Canadian from Canada and Sol from Mexico, again, both very small brands in The U. S. Also, since a significant portion of our direct materials are sourced domestically or are USMCA compliant, we don't expect a material direct impact from the known tariffs on our input costs. Therefore, we believe we are one of the better positioned businesses in our category.

So we continue to evaluate options to mitigate exposure and risk. For example, leveraging additional domestic supply where possible. And while tariffs have had indirect impacts, causing fluctuations in commodity costs plus the Midwest premium, our extensive hedging program can help to mitigate some of that exposure. Lastly, please remember that net sales revenue and underlying pretax income growth guidance metrics are on a constant currency basis and underlying earnings per share is not. Therefore, fluctuations in the U.

S. Dollar will impact our reported results as well as underlying earnings per share growth and in the effective period using the current exchange rate. With that said, as Gavin discussed, we have updated several of our guidance metrics due to softer industry trends than we believe most expected, which we attribute to the macro shifts that we have discussed that have driven consumer uncertainty and pressured consumption trends. As such, we have updated certain key guidance metrics. We now expect a low single digit net sales revenue decline on a constant currency basis as compared to low single digit growth previously, a low single digit underlying pretax income decline on a constant currency basis as compared to mid single digit growth previously a low single digit underlying earnings per share growth as compared to high single digit growth previously lower capital expenditures incurred of $650,000,000 plus or minus 5% as compared to $750,000,000 plus or minus 5% previously.

All remaining metrics are unchanged, including underlying free cash flow of $1,300,000,000 plus or minus 10%. Turning to our guidance drivers. AppS top line assumes an anticipated annual net price increase of 1% to 2% in North America, in line with the average historical range and for other markets to trend in line with inflation. It also assumes mixed benefits from cycling contract brewing from 2024 as well as from premiumization. In 2025, we expect to continue to grow above premium net brand revenue in EMEA and APAC and Canada as well as make progress in The U.

S. Where, as Gavin shared, we remain committed to turning Lumin around and are embarking on big plans for Peroni and non alf. While Pheasantry and the consolidation of Zoho provide incremental benefits to the top line, we will also be cycling revenue from the smaller regional breweries we divested in the third quarter of twenty twenty four and more significantly, 2024 tax and the back contract brewing volume as again these contracts terminated at the end of last year. On a combined basis, we expect a related 1,900,000 hectoliter headwind to Americas financial volume in 2025. In the first quarter, we sampled about 590,000 hectoliters of this contract brewing volume on a combined basis.

We will cycle a similar amount in the second quarter. Also recall that last year we had higher than typical inventory build in The U. S. Related to the Fort Worth strike, which ended in mid May. As a result, STWs outpaced STRs by approximately 1,100,000 hectoliters in the first half, with STWs exceeding STRs by about 350,000 hectoliters in the second quarter of twenty twenty four.

So given that hurdle in the second quarter, we anticipate that this year's shipment trend catch up to STRs will occur primarily in the third quarter. Moving down the P and L, we expect fixed benefits from lower contract brewing and increased premiumization, moderating inflation on input costs and productivity improvements and cost savings to be offset by higher than previously expected volume deleverage given industry volume trends. We continue to expect MG and A to be up for the year. This is largely driven by higher G and A related to our non initiatives, which include infrastructure investments to support our total non ALK business as well as Pheasantry onetime transition and integration fees. Due to the timing of the RFP process, in addition to the approximately $30,000,000 recorded in the first quarter, we expect to record a remaining amount of under $10,000,000 in the second quarter.

However, we expect to recover these fees in the form of a credit to net sales revenue over the next three years. These G and A increases are expected to be partly offset by deliberate actions to manage our near term cost structure given the current macro environment. For example, we are taking a deliberate and more restrictive approach to our recruitment efforts in the near term and we intend to reduce certain non business critical discretionary items like travel and entertainment. As for marketing, we intend to put the right commercial pressure behind our brands, with strong investments behind our core power brands, Peroni, the Blue Moon family, Madri and our Donnell portfolio. We are also refining and prioritizing our capital projects for 2025.

As a result, we are reducing our guidance for capital expenditure by $100,000,000 postponing certain projects that do not relate to significant cost savings or critical growth initiatives. We are committed to protecting and growing our underlying free cash flow, while making prudent capital allocation decisions that support our growth initiatives and allow us to return cash to shareholders. To sum it up, these are uncertain times, but we believe we have the right strategy and a healthy balance sheet and strong cash generation to continue to execute it, while continuing to return cash

shareholders. We believe we are taking the necessary steps to help protect profitability in the near term, while supporting the health of our business and brands in the medium and long term. Now before we open it up to your questions, Gavin has a few closing remarks. Gavin?

Thanks, Tracy. A few weeks ago, the company announced my intention to retire at the end of this year. After nearly forty five years in the workforce and twenty eight years in this incredible industry, I thought it was time. I am so proud to have been a part of Molson Kooers' many accomplishments over the decades and honored to have led this great company for the last six years. Now while the Board executes our succession process, I want you to know that it is business as usual at Molson Kur's.

We remain hard at work executing our strategy and focused on achieving our revised financial objectives this year. As I prepare to step aside, I remain confident in the beer industry, in the company's position, its business plans and its future. So I look forward to continuing to engage with you all, the investment community in the months ahead as we set up the next leader to build on the company's success. And with that, we will take your questions. Operator?

Thank you. We will now begin the question and answer session. The first question today comes from Brian Spillane with Bank of America.

Congratulations on the announcement. And I guess I would say thank you for all the patience, right? I know we've badgered a lot over the years and really appreciate that you've maintained your patience with us over that time.

appreciate You're welcome. Have two questions. One is just with regards to this year, maybe Gavin, just at a high level and or Tracy, just I guess if I'm reading the press release and the prepared remarks, what's changed since the start of this year is really just The U. S. Market slower industry slower than I guess we all expected at the start.

And I guess perhaps a little bit of the promotional elements in I guess mostly in Europe. So just and I ask this just in the context of the guidance implies a bit of an improvement in organic sales over the back half of the year. And aside from the stuff that we know in terms of

just trying to isolate like what should be what we should be watching as we go through the balance of the year to support, right, what's implied as an improvement in organic sales in the back half or in the back three quarters?

Well, thanks, Brian, and thanks for the question. Look, think a lot of what happened in the first quarter was expected by us, I think we communicated that on the fourth quarter earnings call, right? So the shipment timing issue, given the Fort Worth strike, was expected. The Fever Tree onetime costs were also expected. They were a little higher than we had originally anticipated, but we certainly expected the onetime costs that came through from Preevatree.

What was unexpected was the macroeconomic conditions which have surrounded us. Frankly, almost every consumer company that has released results over the last few weeks has reported challenges with consumer confidence and consumer demand. So, we certainly didn't have an industry forecast of down around 5% our coming in position. And if you look out to the balance of the year and you compare it with what happened last year, if you remember in the summer of last year, we saw economic pressure and that caused some value seeking behavior by the consumers and it had a direct impact on category performance. And so whilst that was certainly the case in the largest selling season last year, by the time we got to the end of the year, it had recovered.

Our forecast is that it doesn't include an ongoing consistent down around 5% industry for the rest of the year. It does anticipate that the industry will improve from its current trend line. So hopefully, that's helpful. And maybe just to add to that, as Tracy said on the call, the pricing environment, we expect it to fall into that 1% to 2% historical range that we talked about last time as well. I think the other important point to note is that a lot of our activity, lot of our plants hit in the second quarter.

And so whilst obviously already seen a really nice improvement in the trends of Peroni, for example, the plants really only hit now. And obviously, we've only had Fever Tree for a couple of months in the first quarter and our integration plans for that are still ahead of us. Don't forget that every case of Fever Tree we sell is incremental to our business. So hopefully that helps, Brian. Thanks.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Bonnie Herzog with Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead.

All right. Thank you. Good morning, everyone. And yes, congratulations from me too, Gavin.

to ask, I guess, a follow-up question on guidance. Given, I guess, the weak Q1 results, I'd like to hear if you're losing more share than you thought. I guess, I assume your retained share that you've talked about in the past is now below the 80 percent. So if you could update us on that, that would be great. And then maybe just a little bit more color, Gavin, on the month to month trends during the quarter and whether your trends have accelerated in April and then into May?

I guess I'm really trying to gauge the current run rate of your business in the context of the slower than expected Q1. Thank you.

Thanks, Bonnie. Look, from a retention of our core power brands in The U. S, that meaningful step up that took place in 2023, we've retained almost all of that. I think when you look at where our core brands were before Q1 of or Q2 of twenty twenty three, they were at around 13.5 share, and they almost immediately jumped up over the three month time period in the following quarter to about 15.6. And at the end of Q1, we're at 15.4.

So we've retained almost every piece of share that we gained. I would attribute that to the health of our core brands, Coors Light, Miller Lite and Coors Banquet. I would attribute that to the tremendous work of our chain teams in gaining significant share of shelf space and actually retaining it, which is our expectation this spring resets. All the data that we've got suggests that we're going to retain and actually grow a little bit of share, particularly with Coors Banquet. Coors Banquet's trends are just on fire and it's being represented in our shelf resets.

So I think that's the first point, Bonnie, is that we have retained a substantial amount of the share that we gained from a core point of view. As far as our total share trends are concerned, they have sequentially improved quarter over quarter since the third quarter of last year. In Q3, I think we lost about one percentage. In Q4, improved to 0.7% and in the first quarter of this year, that improved to 2.6%. So our trends have been improving quarter over quarter.

Our Q1 trends were relatively stable through about the middle of the month. We did in mid March have a little bit of accelerated share loss. So, it was two reasons. One is we made a pack quite a meaningful pack shift change with our Blue Moon brand moving from 15s to 12s that caused quite a lot of disruption from a Blue Moon point of view. And the Simply brand share decline also accelerated because we left the line innovation, which we had in Q1 of last year.

And innovation on Simply is actually coming into Q2 of this year. So a little bit of timing difference there. From an overall industry point of view, there has been some improvement in the industry in the last April 4. Obviously, as I said in response to Brian's question, we are not anticipating that the industry will continue to decline at that sort of around 5% range as we go forward. So hopefully, that's helpful, Bonnie.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Filippo Saloni with Citi. Please go ahead.

Hi, good morning everyone. And Gavin congrats on announcement. Maybe I want to start with the question on the beer category. Generally, look, it's been a pretty soft Q1. We've seen the trends to really not really accelerate that much into April adjusted for the Easter timing.

I'm just curious what are your expectations for the balance of the year? Do you think like a decline more in the 3% to 4% is possible for any sense of that growth impact that you're expecting within the 2025 guidance? Thank you.

Felipe, I'm sorry, I caught the first part of your question, but I didn't catch second part at all. So if you wouldn't mind just repeating the second part. We didn't catch that at all. There was a lot of disruption.

Yes, absolutely. So the second part on tariffs, I was just curious if you can put some numbers in terms of the magnitude of the impact on a gross basis and just on the mitigation actions as well. Thank you.

Thanks, Philippe. Yes, I've got to take the second time around. Trace will handle that in a second. But from an overall industry point of view, look, we don't have a public forecast of the industry for the year or the balance of the year. But just to reiterate for perspective, within the guidance that we are now revising, we have assumed that the industry will be better than what we've seen at the start of the year, which was down around that 5% in Q1.

And we do expect over the balance of the year that we'll see the similar trend lines that we've seen over the last few years. Obviously, one quarter doesn't a year make. There were some we talked about the consumer confidence challenges in the macroeconomic environments, and obviously, we can't predict when that will end, but they are certainly cyclical and they will end. The timing of that is obviously uncertain. Tracy, do want to talk about tariffs?

Yes. So look, from an input cost point of view, Felipe, we import a very small portion of our U. S. Portfolio from Canada and Mexico. It's really only Molson and Sol, respectively, which is really small volume for The U.

S. Markets. We do import the majority of Beaver Tree from Europe, but we have the ability to onshore this brand through co manufacturing, etcetera, in our network. One of the bigger impacts would have been Peyronie, but of course now the majority of that is produced in The U. S.

So that has isolated us from tariffs. The majority as we see, the majority of our direct materials are sourced domestically and we use NCA compliance. So immaterial impact from an input cost point of view. You know, the one thing that we have spoken about is our extensive hedging program. And we've been able to hedge commodities even though we source locally for local production.

But we have also spoken about the Midwest premium. That's one of the commodities that is difficult because of the lack of transparency to the pricing of that commodity as well as the ability to hedge that it's not as liquid as some of our other commodities. So that is the one area that doesn't sort of behave the way that we would expect market dynamics to behave for commodities. But really we don't expect a material impact from you know known tariffs right now on our input costs.

Thank you. The next question comes from Chris Carey with Wells Fargo. Please go ahead.

Hi, everyone. I actually wanted to follow-up on this. Hey, Gavin. I wanted to follow-up around cost inflation and gross margins and a quick follow-up for Gavin. So this was the first quarter, I believe, of small net favorability in cost inflation within your COGS per hectoliter disclosures of the past few years.

Is there a reason that, that would change notably in the coming quarters? I know you don't guide on these types of topics, but just evolution of hedges, Midwest premium, tariff inflation, I'm just struck that that is slight favorability in the context of recent history, you sound comfortable around overall inflation. And I just wonder if you could contextualize that in the context of maybe like medium term evolution of that specific bucket. The then just the the the follow-up would be, you know, Gavin, regarding, you know, timing of, you know, leadership transition, the types of leaders, you know, that you and the board will will be, you know, assessing. You know, I'd love any context on that.

Thanks very much, Chris. I'll take your second question first, then Trace can take the cost of goods sold one. Look, the process is underway. The Board is looking at internal candidates and external candidates. Obviously, top priority is to navigate the process very thoughtfully.

In terms of capabilities, I expect the Board is paying a lot of attention to both relevant business and leadership experience along with a cultural fit. The culture that we've built here at Bolson Coors is very special, and the Board is intent on appointing a new CEO who will be able to galvanize our people and our partners around a clear vision for the next stage of our company. I think it's important to say that the Board believes in our current long term strategy. Obviously, a new CEO will put their own stamp on the company, but the Board is supportive of our long term strategy. And as I said in my, I think, my closing remarks, Chris, business as usual, I'm going run through the tape to the end of the year.

Molson Coors Beverage (TAP) Q1 2025 Earnings Call Transcript

Company Participants