With a combined revenue of $21 trillion and $2.1 trillion in profits, the 2026 Fortune 500 is the definitive list of America's largest companies.

Fortune 500

Fortune partnered with Great Place to Work to analyze survey feedback representing nearly 116,000 U.S. employees.

Best Workplaces_Texas_Large_2025-KBR_US1__67fd62d0bb07cc513ab900d5_4

Employees say:"What makes KBR a truly exceptionally great place to work is leaderships emphasis on employee happiness and growth. I have seen others experience and personally experienced how leadership genuinely values my well-being and takes time to ensure I am engaged on projects that I am personally interested in and that align with my personal interests and my career aspirations. Additionally, KBR fosters a collaborative and inclusive culture through team outings, lunches, and more."

Best Large Workplaces in Texas

Almost $20 trillion in revenue—and a record-breaking $1.87 trillion in profits. Introducing the 2025 Fortune 500, the definitive list of the biggest companies in America.

Leaders in all industries rely more than ever on Big Tech—and appreciate the giants that deliver, at scale, without drama.

World's Most Admired Companies

Fortune partnered with Great Place to Work to analyze survey feedback representing nearly 95,000 U.S. employees.

GPTW-2024-Texas-Large-KBR

Employees say:"Firstly, I have the freedom and flexibility to brainstorm to resolve issues or present my ideas. Secondly, I have the comfort of approaching anyone from any level of seniority for discussions, which helps me ace at my work."

The Fortune 500, in its 70th year in 2024, ranks the biggest U.S. companies by revenue.

The 25th Fortune World’s Most Admired Companies list suggests that tech giants’ peers respect them as much as ever.

Fortune partnered with Great Place to Work to analyze survey feedback representing nearly 100,000 U.S. employees.

GPTW Texas 2023-KBR

Employees say: 
 
"The executive leadership team is approachable and does a great job with downward communication. Also, the various ERGs offered at KBR give everyone an opportunity to connect and belong."

The Fortune 500, in its 69th year in 2023, ranks the biggest U.S. companies by revenue.

Just as it dominates our economy, Big Tech now dominates Fortune’s annual ranking of corporate reputation.

This year’s Fortune 500 marks the 68th running of the list.

After a year in which humanity leaned more heavily than ever on tech giants, see which companies topped Fortune's ranking of corporate reputation.

This year’s Fortune 500 marks the 67th running of the list.

F500-2021-470-KBR

KBR, formerly known as Kellogg, Brown &amp; Root, has a long history as a top contractor in defense and aerospace, with roots dating back to World War II. The company offered engineering, procurement, and construction services for clients including the U.S. military until 2020, when it pivoted. Under new CEO Stuart J.B. Bradie, the company has shifted its focus to technology services. Among KBR's new clients is the U.S. Geological Survey, with which it has a contract to analyze satellite data.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 66th running of the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 65th running of the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 64th running of the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 63rd running of the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 62nd running of the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 61st running of the list. Wal-Mart claims the top spot again. See who made the list.

Wal-Mart stayed on top as its sales crept closer to half-a-trillion dollars. Apple moved into the top five. And UnitedHealth Group continued its steady climb. 

Sector

Industry

Current All-Star Rank

Previous All-Star Rank

Industry Rank

Previous Industry Rank

Overall Score

Innovation

People Management

Use of Corporate Assets

Social Responsibility

Quality of Management

Financial Soundness

Long-Term Investment Value

Quality of Products/Services

Global Competitiveness

Best Workplaces In Texas

Founded

Sites

Key Financials (last Fiscal Year)

Revenues ($M)

Profits ($M)

Assets ($M)

Total Stockholder Equity ($M)

Profit Ratios

Profit as % of Revenues

Profits as % of Assets

Profits as % of Stockholder Equity

Earnings Per Share (last Fiscal Year)

Earnings Per Share ($)

EPS % Change (from prior fiscal year)

EPS % Change (5 year annual rate)

EPS % Change (10 year annual rate)

Total Return

Total Return to Investors (last year)

Total Return to Investors (5 year, annualized)

Total Return to Investors (10 year, annualized)

KBR is a scientific, technology, and engineering solutions provider, serving governments and commercial customers around the world. Founded in 1901, the company has two segments: government solutions and sustainable technology solutions. KBR’s services include research and development, cyber analytics, space domain awareness, and more. The company also provides synergistic services, such as net-zero carbon emission solutions, and operates a portfolio of proprietary process technologies.

Q2 2026

Q1 2026

Q4 2025

Q3 2025

Q2 2025

Q1 2025

KBR (KBR): Company Profile, Stock Price, News, Rankings

legacy

Thank you for attending today's KBR third quarter 2025 earnings conference call. My name is Megan and I'll be your moderator today. All lines will be muted during the presentation portion of the call, with an opportunity for questions and answers at the end. If you would like to ask a question during that time, simply press star 1 on your telephone keypad. I would now like to pass the conference over to Jamie DuBray, VP of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Thank you. Good morning and welcome to KBR's third quarter fiscal 2025 earnings call. Joining me are Stuart Bradie, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Mark Sopp, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Stuart and Mark will provide highlights from the quarter and then open the call for your questions. Today's earnings presentation is available on the Investors section of our website at kbr.com. This discussion includes forward-looking statements reflecting KBR's views about future events and their potential impact on performance as outlined on slide two. These matters involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ significantly from these forward-looking statements. As discussed in our most recent Form 10-K available on our website, this discussion also includes non-GAAP financial measures that the company believes to be useful metrics for investors.

A reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to the nearest GAAP measure is included at the end of our earnings presentation. I will now turn the call over to Stuart.

Thanks Jamie and good morning everyone. I will pick up on slide four. As with all meetings at KBR, we begin today with a brief Zero Harm moment. Last week we published our 2024 sustainability report, and I would like to highlight several key achievements from this most recent publication. We are pleased to report an industry-leading Health, Safety, Security incident rate and over 93% Zero Harm days. Additionally, 38% of KBR's fiscal 2024 revenue, equivalent to $2.9 billion, was allocated towards sustainability initiatives, marking an increase from the $2.5 billion in the previous year. Furthermore, KBR has established and approved science-based near-term targets that align with their net-zero objectives. These accomplishments distinguish KBR within our industry. For the third consecutive year, we have been awarded MSCI's top AAA rating, and we recently received a B- rating from ISS ESG Corporate.

This is a recognized prime rating and at the top of our peer group. These highlights represent only a portion of our progress, and I encourage you to review the full sustainability report, which is available on our website via the QR code. Now on to slide five. Let me start today with revenue. Revenue was flat in the quarter year-on-year and up 5% year-to-date from the prior year. While we are really encouraged by a strong book-to-bill of 1.4x for the quarter, this was back-end weighted with little conversion to revenue in Q3 in MTS. As you know, we have significant contracts awarded to us which are still under protest, and conversion remains uncertain. With the government shutdown environment in STS, we faced several headwinds in the first half of the year. LNG project development was delayed by prior administration decisions.

Oversupply in petrochemicals led to multiple project cancellations and delays. Middle East unrest caused temporary pauses, and new tariffs delayed investment. Additionally, a market shift towards energy affordability resulted in most of our green technology prospects being postponed or cancelled. With that in mind, however, the STS business has proven remarkably resilient. We have replaced the revenue reductions caused by the above headwinds with geographical expansion. We talked about the Middle East and countries like Iraq last quarter, and we've really doubled down in the better markets like LNG, ammonia for fertilizer, energy affordability, and circularity. STS book to bill in Q3 was pleasing, but as I said a moment ago, this was back-end weighted and Mark will discuss the short term impact of this in a moment.

The recent bookings we think show a shift in momentum which we expect to continue in Q4, setting us up nicely heading into 2026. Importantly, we focused on what we can control. We delivered excellent bottom line performance in Q3 across all metrics. Adjusted EBITDA margins were up more than 100 basis points year-on-year at 12.4%, delivering an adjusted EBITDA of $240 million, up 10%. This was from a combination of delivery excellence, strong commercial management, and prudent cost control. This translated into an adjusted EPS of $1.02, an increase of 21% year-over-year. Now, cash, really important. Cash was the standout in the quarter with conversion over 130% year-to-date, generating operating cash of $198 million in the quarter and $506 million year-to-date, and this takes us into a guided range for the full year. A terrific performance.

Thirdly, our book to bill in the quarter in both segments was solid and we continue to be well positioned in key markets with a robust pipeline of opportunities awaiting award. In addition, we have several new wins in areas of strategic importance. More on this in a moment. In such volatile times, the quality of the work under contract and the pipeline are clear indicators of future earnings potential and thus worth more detail. Fourth, we'll remind you that circa 40% of KBR's group revenue and over 60% of adjusted EBITDA has zero exposure to the U.S. government spending budgets and of course risk related to the shutdown. Within MTS, the majority of our portfolio, as we've discussed many times, is comprised of mission-essential operational work, many of which are well funded multi-year programs. This provides short-term resilience to the government shutdown.

Mark will provide additional details in the outlook. Fifth, we returned more than $120 million in capital to shareholders this quarter while managing leverage responsibly. Finally, work to progress. The spin off is on track, which I'll discuss in more detail later. Onto slide six and some new contract wins. We were pleased to announce a number of new contract wins during the third quarter, a few of which I will highlight. Let me start with MTS. We were awarded a $2.5 billion ceiling value base period contract plus another $1 billion in option value to support astronaut health and human performance during space missions. This achievement represents our largest recompete this year. Human performance and space remains a key strategic area for NASA over the medium term, as demonstrated by the significantly higher ceiling value awarded to us.

Our booking value for this contract, to be clear, was below $1 billion, which is more consistent with the current run rate. MTS also secured several strategic contracts with the Air Force Research Laboratory utilizing our expertise in cyber security, trusted microelectronics, electronic warfare, digital forensics, and sensing. These technological solutions are used to enhance situational awareness and therefore strengthen decision-making for our military customers. Really important stuff. MTS was also recently awarded a contract for the U.S. Space Force to deploy our groundbreaking collaborative digital engineering ecosystem called Integration Accelerator to enhance Space Force decision-making and accelerate capability deployment. The Design Implementation for Collaborative Environment, or DICE, together with Integration Accelerator, will focus on establishing a state-of-the-art testing and training environment for the U.S. Space Force at its national headquarters.

Moving to STS, we continue to be a strategic partner for Basra Oil Company and have extended our current contract two more years to continue to perform engineering, procurement, and construction management services for the Majnoon oil field in Iraq, and that's one of the country's most strategic assets. STS was also awarded a contract by the Abu Dhabi Transmission Company (TAQA) for program management consultancy services to manage the overall execution of the power and water transmission networks across multiple locations in the UAE to enable data center expansion. STS was also awarded a front-end engineering design contract for Kuwait Oil Company. That's for their heavy oil program, another strategic energy security project for the nation. Last but not least, STS was awarded the FEED contract for the Abadi Onshore LNG project in Indonesia.

This is a complex project which has critical significance to national energy security and demonstrates KBR's long standing track record in excellence in LNG. The book-to-bill for the group in the quarter was 1.4x with a trailing 12 months of 1.0x. Backlog plus options now stand at more than $23 billion and this value represents a 13% increase since prior year end and is the highest backlog and option value in KBR's recent history. I think this clearly provides for the growth capacity contemplated in a long term view. Onto slide seven, next I'll update you on our pipeline and award trends in both segments. Currently, MTS has $18 billion in bids pending award with over 75% representing new business opportunities. Some contracts such as HHPC have recently been awarded while new proposals have also been submitted and are awaiting decisions.

Although the government contract environment did show some signs of improvement in Q3, the shutdown has brought decisions to a halt, so more delays should be expected. In addition to the $18 billion, there are now $3 billion in contracts awarded to KBR as the winning bidder that remain under protest and that's an increase of 50% from the previous quarter. The major addition was a classified program in INDOPACOM which is now included in this category. Overall, this year both the amount bid and the amount won have increased compared to the previous year's levels at this time. While short-term conversion has been a challenge, matters under our control to grow backlog plus options and pipeline have progressed well and we remain confident in our strategic positioning moving forward.

MTS itself delivered a 1.4x book-to-bill in the quarter and ended with $19.7 billion in backlog plus options and that's an increase of almost $2 billion versus the prior quarter. STS delivered a 1.2x book-to-bill excluding LNG in the quarter and ended with $3.7 billion in backlog. We currently have over $5 billion in our near-term bid pipeline and that excludes major LNG. This is up from the second quarter when we reported $4.5 billion. This is a 20% increase for our base business. You will also recall last quarter we saw an anticipated circa $1.5 billion in awards expected to be approved during the second half of the year.

In this quarter we secured over $800 million in bookings which I believe demonstrate the value of the STS global business model, our deep customer relationships, and our laser focus on delivering value add solutions to solve our customers' challenges. With that, I'll pass it over to Mark.

Mark, thank you, Stuart, and good morning, everyone. I'll pick up on slide nine and our Q3 performance highlights. Revenues in the quarter, as you heard from Stuart, were $1.9 billion, flat versus the prior year and up 5% on a year-to-date basis. For the reason Stuart covered earlier, adjusted EBITDA was quite healthy at $240 million, up 10% with margins at 12.4%, an increase of over 100 basis points versus the prior year. This contribution came from both segments, with STS particularly strong. Adjusted EPS was $1.02 in the quarter, up 21%, driven by the growth in adjusted EBITDA performance as well as the benefits from buybacks we've made over the last year. Year-to-date, operating cash flow was $506 million, an increase of 24% from the prior year at a conversion rate of more than 130% against net income. This bumped up quite a bit in Q3.

As Stuart mentioned earlier, strong cash performance was attributable to successful DSO reduction measures in both segments. I'll also add we received about $80 million in investing cash flows from the turnover of private equity partners in our Brown & Root Industrial Services joint venture. While it's certainly good to add this to our treasury at this time, we do expect to fund new investments in this space with our new partner. In the relatively short term, this will further expand our reach into the OpEx side of the STS business, which is perfectly aligned with our strategy of increasing exposure to recurring revenue streams in that area. Now, move on to slide 10 and our segment performance. Starting with MTS, revenues of $1.4 billion were flat versus the prior year.

Breaking that down by business unit, Defense and Intelligence generated growth of 14% with contribution from the international side and also LinQuest. That business, LinQuest, as you'll recall, has added increased volume in military space and digital modernization, with quite a bit of that work being in the classified category. Readiness and sustainment was down 22%, primarily due to Department of War strategic shifts, including customer reductions in the OP tempo in the European Command Theater and pre-positioned stock programs. We discussed both of those developments last quarter. After this quarter end, the APS-2 pre-position program has come out of protest and in our favor, but the notice to proceed is hung up due to the shutdown. This will represent a future booking once that condition reverses. Importantly, revenue for R&S was flat sequentially, so other than any shutdown effects.

We think we have cycled out of the areas that the Department of War is de-emphasizing and have meaningful growth opportunities in protest and in the pipeline. Science and space was down 5%. While we did have the HHPC recompete win, which was terrific, there's really been a lack of new award activity outside of that, and there's an overall funding and decision delays in NASA overall in recent months. It's been a tough year at the agency, but we're certainly hopeful of more visibility and stability in the coming months as they navigate through the 2026 budget process in Congress once the shutdown lifts. Adjusted EBITDA for MTS was $143 million commensurate with the revenue level with margins at a little over 10%. Now move on to STS. Revenues of $525 million in Q3 were down about 1% due to back end weighted awards in the quarter.

Positively though, adjusted EBITDA came in at $123 million, up 13%. Adjusted EBITDA margins were 23.5%, roughly reflecting continued strong contribution from the Plaquemines LNG project coming through in equity and earnings offset by heavier proprietary equipment mix which adds to the installed base but also has lower than normative margins. We advanced more milestones on the Plaquemines project than originally planned in Q3 and that bumped up our profit recognition this quarter. We do expect Q4 to look more normative as the rate we had in the first half of this year. On to slide 11 for the balance sheet and capital matters, we had really good outcomes in the quarter. Stuart covered those earlier, highlighted by the strong cash flow. We continue to delever now down to a net leverage ratio of 2.2x.

While doing that, we have deployed over $300 million for buybacks so far this year and that certainly was contained in Q3. This amounts to 4.5% of outstanding shares removed from over the course of this year dividends. Add another $60 million in capital returned to shareholders as well on a year-to-date basis. You'll also note that we have returned to normalized CapEx below 0.5% of revenue.

Our outlook for the balance of the year. On to slide 12. First, let me start by addressing our near-term outlook in light of the government shutdown. As Stuart mentioned earlier, our diversified international portfolio reduces concentration risk relative to the U.S. government. For our U.S. government contracting business, as Stuart said earlier, most of our work is deemed essential and furthermore we have good stability in our funded backlog. Specifically, U.S. funded backlog was $2 billion at the end of Q3, which is over five months of our current revenue run rate. This is slightly up from Q2. With these factors, we have seen no material impacts from the shutdown in October and are confident we can navigate through November with minimal impact to revenue. The main areas impacted by the shutdown to KBR are the further slowdown of new awards as well as the resolution of protests outstanding.

As earlier stated, we now have $3 billion in awards which we have won but cannot book or start until the protest clears. The shutdown does mean the conversion of these awards to revenue will be even further delayed, which modestly lowers our outlook for MTS in the fourth quarter. Now moving on to STS. As Stuart mentioned earlier, STS experienced a number of headwinds so far in 2023. These delays have caused conversion challenges which impacted our revenue growth outlook for the year. With some awards coming in late Q3, we have good visibility to modestly improved revenues in Q3 to Q4, but still short of what we had planned for the year. With all of that, we are updating our revenue guidance today for 2023 to a range of $7.75 billion-$7.85 billion for the year with an updated midpoint of $7.8 billion flat.

We are reaffirming profit metrics due to the strong year-to-date performance. Adjusted EBITDA remains within the range of $960 million-$980 million. We're also reconfirming the corresponding adjusted EPS guidance of $3.78-$3.88. We're also keeping operating cash flow in the same $500 million-$550 million range. Given our year-to-date cash flow was $506 million, we have effectively delivered 96% of the guide at midpoint already with STS. The international government cash streams have been unchanged and some payments are still being made actually on the U.S. government side. We're confident we can manage working capital effectively to achieve operating cash flow neutrality through year end with our underlying assumptions. Speaking of that, our guidance is based on the assumption that the government shutdown is resolved in November. Other key assumptions in our guidance are unchanged including tax, CapEx, and interest expense.

With that, I'll turn it back to Stuart to wrap it up.

Thank you very much, Mark. Before the key takeaways, I will give you an update on the spinoff, which.

Was previously announced on September 24th.

We are spinning off our Mission Technologies segment, which I would refer to as SpinCo for now until a new name is announced later. New KBR will comprise the Sustainable Technology Solutions business. Our intent is to pursue this as a tax-free spin, and upon completion of which KBR and its shareholders will benefit from ownership in two pure-play public companies with enhanced strategic focus on operational independence and financial flexibility. Of course, the transaction will be subject to final approval by KBR's Board of Directors and other customary conditions. The expected benefits of the spin-off: enhanced strategic and management focus, organizational agility and streamlined decision-making, increased end market focus, prioritized commercial resources and sharpened go-to-market approach, greater capital allocation flexibility to support strategic imperatives including potential future M&A transactions directed at each separate business, and there will be distinct and compelling investment profiles for each.

Now on to slide 14 and a status update. The spin-off will take place in three phases: number one, advanced preparation; number two, public filing and execution; and number three, post-distribution. KBR is targeting completion of the spin-off by mid to late 2026, and in order to meet this date, we are broadly aiming for the timeline shown. Of course, schedules are subject to change, and we'll be communicating with our investment community along the way as things progress. Today, spin-off preparations are advancing according to plan. Presently, we are conducting audits of historical carved-out financial statements and preparation of the pro forma financials while also laying the groundwork for the Form 10. Additionally, recruitment processes for the CEO and CFO positions for SpinCo are progressing alongside preliminary work on naming and branding strategies.

We have been very deliberate to set up a separate project team in order to minimize disruption to our operations and allow our teams to focus on their core business. Now on to slide 15 and some key takeaways from today. First, revenue was flat year-on-year but in line with expectations given the slower award environment and the step down in MTS work communicated earlier. Second, we delivered strong bottom line performance with adjusted EBITDA of $240 million, and that's up 10%, and we also generated an adjusted EBITDA margin of 12.4%, up more than 100 basis points year-over-year.

Adjusted EPS was up 21% and the standout for the quarter being operating and free cash flow. Third book to bill in the quarter in both segments was strong, aggregating to 1.4x, and we continue to be well positioned in key markets and have a robust pipeline of opportunities awaiting award. Work under contract or backlog increased, which together with the pipeline are strong indicators of future growth and earnings potential. Next, we are highlighting our resilience and operational focus due to the fact that over 60% of adjusted EBITDA has zero exposure to the U.S. government spending budgets.

We have seen no material impacts from the shutdown through today. We continued with our disciplined capital allocation, returning over $360 million to shareholders year-to-date. Finally, a spin off is progressing nicely. With that, I'll pass it back to the operator who will open the call for Q&A. Thank you.

Thank you. If you would like to ask a question, please press star followed by one on your telephone keypad. If for any reason you would like to remove your question, please press star followed by two. Again, to ask a question, please press star one. As a reminder, if you are using a speakerphone, please remember to pick up your handset before asking your question. We will pause here briefly to allow questions to register. Our first question will go to the line of Andy Kaplowitz with Citigroup. Andy, your line is open.

Stuart or Mark, can you give more color into how you're thinking initially about STS going into 2026? I know you mentioned you have to kind of replace these energy transition type projects and you're doing that, and obviously you have continued good EBITDA performance. I think you said, Stuart, that you think STS should remain in your growth algorithm, but do you have visibility to still grow that business in that sort of 11%-15% range in 2026 and where does that come from at this point?

Good question and not unexpected given the revenue performance during the course of the year. For the matters we discussed in the prepared remarks, the book-to-bill in Q3 and the expected book-to-bill in Q4, as Mark said, the modest revenue pickup between Q3 and Q4 gives us pretty good insight and I think good momentum heading into 2026. We are going through our budget cycle right now, in fact, as we head towards the end of the year, and we've got good line of sight for continued momentum in that business aligned with our stated 2027 CAGRs, which, you know, if you work that backwards from 2023 to 2027, you know, we need double-digit growth in STS and we're still.

Maybe just, you know, similar question in the outlook for MTS. Obviously, you mentioned Defense and Intel up 14%, which is offsetting some of the other pieces of the business. As I think about sort of going into 2026, can you keep up that kind of strength in that business along with international? It helps offset, you know, if readiness and sustainment, for instance, or NASA is still weaker. How do you think about the interplay of the different pieces?

Yeah, again, very good question. As you rightly state, it is an interplay. There's pressure on the science and space budgets because of what's happening around NASA, but of course there's increased spending and we covered off how we sit on programs like Golden Dome, just where we think increased spending in U.S. Space Force and sort of connected battlefield and what we're doing, being able to enhance command and control decisions with our software development technology, etc. Very well placed in the Defense and Intel part of the portfolio. I would say that R&S, with the number of things that we have secured that are under protest, is well positioned, coming off a reasonably low base with the reduction in the EUCOM work this year, is well positioned to grow into next year.

When you combine that with what's happening in international in the U.K., they've come through the defense review and they're going through the process in November, maybe entirely December, on what you would call appropriations, just how they're going to spend their money, and we've done the analysis of where we think those priority spends are and our capability set in Frazer-Nash under defense business in the U.K. is very well positioned to really react to that. As we've said many times, the Australia business continues to outperform, growing. When you lay that all out and you put the puts and takes and you think about delays with this continued environment for protests that delay awards and things like that, we're pretty confident that we can actually achieve the sort of growth that we stated in the ranges that we've put out for that business in the past.

It may well be we probably picture at the lower end of that as we go into next year, but those decisions have not been made yet. Certainly we are progressing towards that sort of outcome and we're confident we can continue to grow the business coming out of the shutdown.

Thank you, Andy. Our next question will go to the line of Augie Smith with D.A. Davidson. Augie, your line is open.

This is Augie Smith on for Brent Thielman.

Briefly, but could you provide a little bit more in depth on your thoughts in regards to NASA exposure and proposed budget cuts, specifically in consideration of the impact for MTS the rest of this year and then potentially into 2026.

For the rest of this year, there's very little impact, particularly under a shutdown environment, just continue as is. We do have one particular contract that's deemed non-essential, but it's not material to our numbers. I'm not expecting too much change for the rest of this year as we head into next year.

We've got an unclear picture, I would say.

Mark, as we've got the presidential push for a reduction in the science area, we've got congressional budgets holding at the current level, and where that all sits and shakes out is difficult to assess. I would say that in the NASA environment it's the lower margin piece of our work. From the bottom line perspective, it's probably less material in terms of looking forward. We've got about less than 25% of our portfolio, even less exposed to the science area, and I think there's going to be increased investment in the human space performance piece of that as we look at Artemis III going back to the moon and Artemis IV, whether that's across what we're doing in human health performance or the work we're doing at the Johnson on the spacesuit program, etc.

There'll be some puts and takes, and I guess we'll be able to describe more color than that in year-end earnings. Certainly, through the course of this year, I don't expect too much disruption, and I stick by my comments I made in my earlier remarks about the overall portfolio and the puts and takes allowing us to grow overall in line with our stated targets.

If I could just squeeze one more in within STS, could you guys touch on how active you guys see opportunities in LNG, if you have any advanced discussions there, or just what you're seeing with potential other LNG terminal projects moving forward?

Yeah, I'll touch on a few there. I mean LNG is a really sort of topic at the moment, as you can expect. I'll start with Plaquemines. I mean our work continues to progress well as we've stated before, we see equity and earnings running all the way through at the sort of current levels through 2026 and into early 2027. In fact, VG themselves have announced that they've got approval to bring in gas to the second block, so Phase II if you like, Plaquemines. That's not really a hard stop for us because we've got a lot of completions and commissioning and work to do through the course of this year and early into 2027. That's aligned with our previous statements on Lake Charles. I'll take you back to their Q2.

There's been some press statements about certainly their delay in FID decisions into Q1 next year, but some press had said that was related to increased costs. That is not correct. They had said very clearly in their Q2 call and I can confirm that the EPC pricing and overall costs, including the impact of tariffs, is bang on expectation and that has not changed. In terms of ET, I think you should really listen into their call, which I believe is next week, November 5th, and they'll give you an update of their thinking and the current progress on the project. That's where that sits. We announced that we had been awarded the front-end engineering design for Abadi, which is a very, very large project in Indonesia, and that work has kicked off and we continue to do work supporting Oman LNG.

We're doing the PMC work in the Waste-to-LNG in Abu Dhabi, and we've got a number of opportunities that we're looking at in the U.S. in addition to Lake Charles and Plaquemines. It's a very active global market for KBR and one we're bullish on.

Thank you, Augie. Our next question will go to the line of Michael Dudas with Vertical Research Partners. Michael, your line is open.

First, maybe following on the STS business, maybe Stuart, away from LNG, when you talk about that $5 billion in pipeline that's visible and some really strong activity maybe for the end of this year into next, what are some of the other areas that are bringing focus given some of the dynamics and shifts and what client desires are because of green and affordability and how that could play into visibility, maybe especially in some of your key ammonia and also maybe even update on the Mira opportunities and ramp ups.

Yeah, quite right, Michael. We were quite specific to exclude LNG from that just because of the scale. Just to show you the progress we're making outside of LNG in the business, so well picked up on, you know, increasing that backlog by the opportunity set by 20% I think is indicative, as was the book-to-bill in the quarter, and we expect that book-to-bill and that to progress similarly in Q4. What are we seeing? We're seeing increased activity, as we said, across the Middle East, and we had a number of wins I touched on, whether it be in Kuwait or Iraq. We see those national agendas being pushed hard, and we're very well placed to take advantage of those. I expect more announcements in those arenas to come forward over the course of the next couple of quarters.

I think international expansion and following the money around national agendas is key. Continue to do that, and that's more about energy security as a thematic when I look across. We've talked a little bit about LNG, of course, which is very positive. Ammonia continues to be a very active market for us, and we've got a number of sort of near and medium-term pursuits, and we expect that to continue. As you rightly state, that's more around traditional ammonia as it pertains to fertilizers rather than hydrogen. I think that's also been pushed to the right a bit as the affordability and economics have come into play, but that continues to be a very attractive market for us. On Mura, the current situation is we continue to progress similar to next quarter, replacing particularly valves that ultimately have.

Pressure, high temperature environment that certain feedstocks that have made the progress in commissioning a bit slower than we had hoped for. I do not expect those plants to be up and running until Q1 at the moment, certainly the one in Wilton, but outside of that there's nothing sinister or any sort of big red flags. I think it's first of a kind technology startup issues and these are not unexpected. We did hope for a Q4 startup, but if it slips to Q1, so be it. I mean, these are long term plays for us and if that picks up, then terrific going into next year and it should present us a super opportunity once the facilities are up and running.

There's not a month that goes by without potential investors in plants across the world coming to visit the site and they're just waiting to make sure that we've got an operating manual we can hand over with a set of equipment specs that actually avoids typical lease commissioning challenges for the next plant, as you would expect. It's quite an active portfolio, team's working hard. I think the resilience in the business has been demonstrated by the way that we've managed to pivot to the well funded pieces of work in the industry and in the markets geographically across the world. Hats off to the team. Quite excited about the future.

Thank you, Stuart. Maybe just quick follow up when you cite the protest levels. Again, I know, difficult to predict. Going into like, what do you get the sense of a cadence, is there, is it certain projects further along or have to get started and how that could break to maybe get that conversion to show up in 2026 or.

Yeah, I think we certainly, I think we're all aware that the government shutdown precludes those protests being resolved and the award being worked. Even the protest that has been resolved, we can't get them to give us a start work order because they're not able to do that under this environment. There will be pickups. The APS-2 position stock in Europe that has come out of protest in our favor will add about $160 million or so to backlog, and we'll book that once we get the work order. As we look forward, you know, the confidential classified opportunity into Paycom, we expect if the government does come out of shutdown, that to be awarded before other protests to be resolved before the end of the year. It's likely the big piece of work in Iraq will be resolved in Q1.

If that does happen, and there's a question mark over that just on timing and how quickly it gets to the top of the priority list to resolve these matters, it will have a significant upside into next year. If it delays, obviously the longer it delays, the lesser the impact. We should be able to give you a very much clearer picture at year end. It's a good fact pattern. There's $3 billion under protest that we've won, and, you know, resolution of that would certainly give strong momentum in the MTS segment going into 2026 and into 2027, for that matter.

Thank you, Michael. Our next question will go to the line of Tobey Sommer with Truist. Tobey, your line is open.

Announcing the spin, received any interest from outside parties in acquiring either of the businesses?

Toby, you know, I can't answer that question. I'm sorry, I just cannot answer that question. You know, the thing that we have announced is going well in terms of under Mark's tutelage, is progressing as expected and on track. It is typical, I would say, that once you announce such things you do get inbounds, but we are not at liberty to discuss them in any way, shape or form. I'm sorry.

Okay. Have you given any more thought to the appropriate comparables for valuation purposes?

The standalone businesses in terms of existing.

Public companies that trade at multiples that you think match your businesses.

Yeah. When I look at MTS, I think the market we've got, let me put it this way, we have an amazing opportunity to rebrand that business, shake off perceptions of the past. When I talk to people even in Wall Street that perhaps don't know us so well, they still think of, I guess, Red KBR back in history and don't understand the transformative journey we've been on to position the company in the areas of D&I and science and space and internationally, as well as sort of digitalize a platform around readiness and sustain. I think there's an amazing opportunity to relaunch the image of the company and tell the story as it is today, not what it was yesterday. We're quite excited about that. I mean, the margin of business, I.

mean, it's progressively grown over time.

We expect that to continue as part of the investment thesis as we look forward. I mean, you know, the typical peers in the government services realm, I don't have to go over those, but we're certainly a more quality business than people are probably appreciating today. There's an amazing opportunity and we're very excited about that opportunity to sort of reinvigorate the market around what will be a new brand and a compelling story of an investment thesis that sits around it. We're working hard on the strategy to support that for Investor Day right now. We just had a session on it this week, in fact, and it was, yeah, you could tell the room was very upbeat, so that was good. On the sustainable tech side, it's a very similar story. We've talked about this last time around.

There are no real comps that do what we do that are publicly traded. Loomis is rumored to be coming to market via an IPO, but I'm not privy as to the timing of that or whether now is a good time or not to do that. That would be a really good comp if that did happen before we expand MTS. As Mark went through last time, as we looked at companies that had energy enablers, that had exposure to professional services the way that we do, or technologies the way we do with the same sort of growth and margin profiles as we are projecting, you know, it's companies like Linde and AECOM and Jacobs to some extent, etc. We talked that through, I think, last quarter. Happy to sit down with you in a separate session and talk through that logic.

KBR (KBR) Q3 2025 Earnings Call Transcript

Company Participants