The companies on the Global 500 employ 70.2 million people, and their revenue represents more than one-third of the world’s GDP.

Fortune Global 500

With a combined revenue of $21 trillion and $2.1 trillion in profits, the 2026 Fortune 500 is the definitive list of America's largest companies.

Fortune 500

The 300 companies on this year’s list brought in over $12.5 trillion in revenue for the latest 12 months, with the median revenue figure at $24 billion.

America's Most Innovative Companies

AI is a major force shaping this year’s list—but it’s far from the only story.

World's Most Admired Companies

The corporations on our annual list of the world's 500 largest companies combined to generate $41.7 trillion in revenue over the past year.

Almost $20 trillion in revenue—and a record-breaking $1.87 trillion in profits. Introducing the 2025 Fortune 500, the definitive list of the biggest companies in America.

The 300 companies on this year’s list brought in over $12.6 trillion in revenue for the latest 12 months, with the median revenue figure at $22 billion.

Leaders in all industries rely more than ever on Big Tech—and appreciate the giants that deliver, at scale, without drama.

Industries included in the sector are banks, insurance, and real estate companies.

Fortune Sector Leaders: Financials

The Fortune 500, in its 70th year in 2024, ranks the biggest U.S. companies by revenue.

The 200 companies on this list are transforming industries from the inside out.

The 26th edition of the list shows how much esteem Big Tech giants command among other business leaders.

The 25th Fortune World’s Most Admired Companies list suggests that tech giants’ peers respect them as much as ever.

The 300 companies on this list are transforming industries from the inside out.

The Fortune 500, in its 69th year in 2023, ranks the biggest U.S. companies by revenue.

Just as it dominates our economy, Big Tech now dominates Fortune’s annual ranking of corporate reputation.

This year’s Fortune 500 marks the 68th running of the list.

After a year in which humanity leaned more heavily than ever on tech giants, see which companies topped Fortune's ranking of corporate reputation.

This year’s Fortune 500 marks the 67th running of the list.

F500-2021-122-CBRE Group

The commercial real estate group moved up six spots on the <em>Fortune</em> 500 this year. The pandemic put a dent in the commercial real estate market, but as more companies bring employees back to the office CBRE group stands to benefit. In the first quarter of 2021, the company reported its first quarterly revenue growth since the same period a year earlier, driven for the most part by non-U.S. markets.

For an astounding 13th straight year, Apple claims the top spot in Fortune’s annual ranking of corporate reputation, based on a survey of almost 3,800 executives, directors, and analysts.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 66th running of the list.

F500-2020-128-CBRE-Group

The world's largest commercial real estate investment manager oversees commercial properties and works with clients around the globe.

Here are the World's Most Admired Companies for 2019 as ranked in their industries. See who made the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 65th running of the list.

Everybody loves an up-and-comer: 2019's top three-year performers in revenues, profits, and stock returns.

100 Fastest-Growing Companies

Here are the World's Most Admired Companies for 2018 as ranked in their industries. See who made the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 64th running of the list.

Here are the World's Most Admired Companies for 2017 as ranked in their industries. See who made the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 63rd running of the list.

Here are the World's Most Admired Companies for 2016 as ranked in their industries. See who made the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 62nd running of the list.

Business insiders have spoken: Asked which companies they most admire, more than 4,100 executives, directors, and analysts chose these top 50 All-Stars.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 61st running of the list. Wal-Mart claims the top spot again. See who made the list.

Wal-Mart stayed on top as its sales crept closer to half-a-trillion dollars. Apple moved into the top five. And UnitedHealth Group continued its steady climb. 

Fastest-growing Companies

Industry

Sector

Current Streak

Years on List

Website

Country

Headquarters

Ticker

Revenue, Net Income

Revenue past four quarters ($M)

Net Income past four quarters ($M)

Market Value ($M)

Growth Rates And Ranks

Revenue 3 Yr Growth Rank

Revenue 3 Yr Annual Growth Rate

EPS 3 Yr Growth Rank

EPS 3 Yr Annual Growth Rate

Total Return 3 Yr Rank

Total Return 3 Yr Annual Rate

Beat S&P 500 3 Yr Return

Current All-Star Rank

Previous All-Star Rank

Industry Rank

Previous Industry Rank

Overall Score

Innovation

People Management

Use of Corporate Assets

Social Responsibility

Quality of Management

Financial Soundness

Long-Term Investment Value

Quality of Products/Services

Global Competitiveness

Strongest Dimension

Years on list

Previous rank

State

Key Financials (last Fiscal Year)

Revenues ($M)

Profits ($M)

Assets ($M)

Total Stockholder Equity ($M)

Profit Ratios

Profit as % of Revenues

Profits as % of Assets

Profits as % of Stockholder Equity

Earnings Per Share (last Fiscal Year)

Earnings Per Share ($)

EPS % Change (from prior fiscal year)

EPS % Change (5 year annual rate)

EPS % Change (10 year annual rate)

Total Return

Total Return to Investors (last year)

Total Return to Investors (5 year, annualized)

Total Return to Investors (10 year, annualized)

Q2 2026

Q1 2026

Q4 2025

Q3 2025

Q2 2025

Q1 2025

Q4 2024

Get insights into CBRE Group including business profile, stock information, news, and rankings from Fortune.

CBRE Group (CBRE): Company Profile, Stock Price, News, Rankings

legacy

CBRE Group

cbre group

Greetings, and welcome to the First Quarter 2026 CBRE Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are on a listen-only mode. A question and answer session will follow the formal presentation. If anyone should require operator assistance, please press star zero on your telephone keypad. As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. It is now my pleasure to introduce your host, Chandni Luthra. Thank you. You may begin.

Good morning, everyone, and welcome to CBRE's First Quarter 2026 Earnings Conference Call. Earlier today, we posted a presentation deck on our website that you can use to follow along with our prepared remarks, and an Excel file that contains additional supplemental material. Today's presentation contains forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, statements concerning our business outlook, business plan, seasonality, and capital allocation strategy, as well as our earnings and cash flow outlook. These statements involve risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results and trends to differ materially. For a full discussion of the risks and other factors that may impact these statements, please refer to this morning's earnings release and our SEC filings. We've provided reconciliations of the non-GAAP financial measures discussed on our call to the most directly comparable GAAP measures, together with explanations of these measures in our presentation deck appendix.

Throughout our remarks, when we cite financial performance relative to expectations, we are referring to actual results against the outlook we provided on our fourth quarter 2025 earnings call in February, unless otherwise noted. Also, as a reminder, our resilient businesses include facilities management, critical infrastructure services, property management, project management, loan servicing, valuations, other portfolio services, and recurring investment management fees. Our transactional businesses comprise property sales, leasing, mortgage origination, carried interest, and incentive fee in the investment management business and development fees. Finally, beginning this quarter, our financial results reflect the financial reporting changes we discussed on our fourth quarter earnings call and in our March 24th 8-K. Prior period results have been recast accordingly. I'm joined on today's call by Bob Sulentic, our Chair and CEO, and Emma Giamartino, our Chief Financial Officer. Now please turn to slide three as I turn the call over to Bob.

Thank you, Chandni, and good morning, everyone. CBRE continued to generate strong financial results while making important strategic gains during the first quarter of 2026. Together, our three services segments, advisory, building operations and experience, and project management, grew revenue by 20% and operating profit by nearly 30%. Additionally, profits from our data center land development program were delivered earlier in the year than anticipated. Our resilient businesses grew revenue by 18%. This reflects our strategy to grow businesses that are resistant to real estate cycles or benefit from secular tailwinds, which support strong through cycle growth. Simultaneously, our transactional businesses achieved their highest growth rate of the current cycle at 22%, reflecting our strategy to maintain and extend our market leadership position in sales, leasing, financing, and real estate development. These businesses generate excellent margins and cash flow while providing data and market insights that help us across CBRE.

Our work related to infrastructure assets has become a source of significant profits and growth spanning all four business segments. This consists of the services we perform for data centers as well as power, telecom, and transportation assets, among others. This is also central to our strategy. We generated more than $3 billion of total revenue from infrastructure activities in 2025 and nearly $950 million in the first quarter. Within the BOE segment specifically, we've created a dedicated critical infrastructure services business line. This business line includes work for data centers along with the telecom and power assets captured in the Pearce business we acquired last year. Revenue in this business line totaled $1.7 billion in 2025 and $580 million in the first quarter, and is expected to grow in excess of 60% this year.

The strong momentum we saw during the first quarter in infrastructure services and across other parts of our business has continued in the early weeks of the second quarter. Considering this, we are upgrading our EPS expectations to a range of $7.60-$7.80 for the year, which would result in more than 20% growth at the midpoint of the range. This assumes that the economic environment remains supportive. Emma will describe our outlook in more detail after she reviews the quarter. Emma?

Thanks, Bob. Good morning, everyone. Our first quarter results exceeded expectations. Even without the pull-forward of profits in our land development program, EPS beat our expectations by nearly 10%. In local currency, our services segments delivered 27% operating profit growth, and as Bob mentioned, nearly 30% with the benefit of FX. Given this relatively large FX tailwind, I will reference growth rates in local currency unless otherwise noted, to best reflect our operating performance. Advisory services revenue saw continued strength in leasing and accelerated growth in sales. Leasing revenue grew 18% globally and 21% in the U.S. Industrial leasing grew 24% in the U.S. As occupiers continue to act ahead of tightening supply for first generation big box facilities. U.S. office leasing revenue increased by 15%, with broad-based strength across gateway and non-gateway markets. Additionally, data center leasing revenue more than tripled from last year's first quarter.

Outside the U.S., leasing revenue rose by double digits in Asia Pacific, led by Japan, while EMEA saw mid-single digit growth. Global property sales revenue growth accelerated from Q4, rising 39%, led by the U.S. and Asia Pacific. U.S. property sales revenue increased 64%, as all major property types delivered double digit increases. Outside the U.S., growth was notably strong in Japan. Mortgage origination revenue increased 53%, fueled by strong volumes from debt funds and the GSEs. Our loan servicing portfolio grew 5% to more than $460 billion. Advisory SOP grew 35%, delivering strong operating leverage. Turning to the building operations and experience segment, revenue grew 16%. In addition to significant growth in our new critical infrastructure services line of business, which Bob described earlier, our local facilities management business continued to increase revenue at a mid-teens rate.

In the Americas, revenue was up almost 30%, as this region had one of its best starts to a year. Enterprise facilities management revenue also grew by double digits, led by the technology, industrial, and life sciences sectors. BOE's SOP increased 23%, with operating leverage driven by an amortization cost reclassification. Excluding this change, SOP growth was in line with revenue growth as expected. Turning to our project management segment, revenue increased 11%, while pass-through costs rose 9%. Growth was underpinned by strong infrastructure activity. Among real estate projects, growth was driven by the technology sector and was broad-based, led by double-digit growth in Asia, the U.K., and the U.S. SOP grew 14%, reflecting operating leverage. In the real estate investment segment, SOP exceeded our expectations, driven by earlier than anticipated data center land sale profits.

We continue to have embedded gains of approximately $900 million that will be monetized over the coming years. In investment management, recurring asset management fees increased, driven by higher net asset values. However, operating profit declined due to lower incentive fees and promote income. We raised $1.3 billion of new capital during the quarter and ended Q1 with more than $155 billion of AUM, in line with Q4's level. Now I'll discuss free cash flow and capital allocation. We produced $1.7 billion of free cash flow on a trailing 12-month basis, reflecting 78% conversion. As we've discussed previously, cash incentive compensation is paid out in the first quarter based on the prior year's performance. Due to the strong performance in 2025, free cash flow conversion was lower than the prior year's Q1.

We expect to end 2026 with free cash flow conversion around the high end of our 75%-85% target range. We have repurchased nearly $540 million of shares year to date, reflecting our continued belief that our share price does not reflect the sustained long-term growth trajectory of our business. As Bob indicated, we now expect full year Core EPS of $7.60-$7.80, up from $7.30-$7.60 previously. The increase is driven by our outperformance in the first quarter and early parts of the second quarter, momentum in our infrastructure services related businesses, and strong pipelines across our company. We are increasing our outlook for advisory and BOE. Advisory is now expected to deliver high teens SOP growth.

We are expecting approximately 25% SOP growth for BOE, which includes high teens growth due to improved performance in the underlying business and the remainder due to the cost reclassification. There will be an offsetting increase to depreciation and amortization, resulting in a neutral impact to net income. Our SOP expectations for project management and REI remain unchanged. Our outlook assumes no material changes to the macroeconomics for the interest rate environment, and in terms of seasonality, as a result of our first quarter outperformance, we expect to generate nearly 40% of EPS in the first half of the year, a higher percentage than we would typically achieve. With that, Operator, we'll open the line for questions.

Thank you. We will now be conducting a question and answer session. If you would like to ask a question, please press one on your telephone keypad. A confirmation tone will indicate your line is in the question queue. You may press two to remove yourself from the queue. For participants using speaker equipment, it may be necessary to pick up the handset before pressing the star keys. Our first question comes from the line of Anthony Paolone with JPMorgan. Please proceed with your question.

Great. Thanks, and good morning and nice quarter. My first question relates to just how you're thinking about the second half of the year because the first quarter and first half looks quite strong. Wondering if you can get into a little bit more of your thinking into how much of that maybe was pulling forward stuff you thought would happen later in the year versus just outright strength and trying to get a sense of your conservatism or how you're thinking about 2H?

Sure, Tony. We increased the midpoint of our guidance from 745 to 770 of EPS, as you saw. As Bob talked about and I talked about, we pulled forward our development profits that we expected to generate later in the year to the first quarter. There's no impact to our guidance for our REI segment. In terms of the raise from 745 to 770, a third of that is based on the outperformance in the first quarter in advisory and BOE, and two-thirds of that raise is increasing our expectations for the remainder of the year. Within advisory, we're seeing strong pipelines going into Q2, and especially in the U.S. Despite the fact that there's uncertainty in the macro, we are raising our outlook and advisory for the remainder of the year.

Remember that growth will still decelerate going into the second half given we're working against tough comparisons. Then within BOE, we're raising our guidance for the remainder of the year slightly given the strength in both critical infrastructure services and local.

Okay, got it. Thank you for that. My second question really is the roughly $30 billion in pipeline and projects in Trammell Crow right now. Can you talk about how much is, say, industrial data center, office and so forth, and just the prospects of that? You mentioned the $900 million, just the prospects of that potentially just being further accelerated and seeing that as the year progresses.

Yeah, Tony. The biggest portion of the Trammell Crow in-process portfolio and pipeline portfolio is in three areas. Industrial, multifamily, and data center land. The thing to know about Trammell Crow Company, forever that business has been really good at acquiring land, entitling land, improving land, and positioning land to be more valuable than it was before we got involved with it. That is a core competency of that business. As we've moved through various parts of the cycle, we've aimed that business in areas that we thought had secular tailwinds. If you remember, coming out of COVID, CBRE was and continues to be a massive office building business, and COVID hammered everything about office buildings. We moved aggressively into industrial land and multifamily land and multifamily development and industrial development, and within two years we were back to record earnings.

What you're seeing now is a considerable amount of investment in multifamily and industrial because we believe there's a dearth of new development that will be coming on over the next few years, and we're well positioned to do that. We've talked a lot about that. We also, around the country, have secured dozens of land sites that have the potential to be data center land sites over time, and we're working with various data center users, especially the hyperscalers, to get that land entitled, get that land powered, get water to the land, and we think we'll have a relatively steady stream of opportunities in data center land over the next few years. It will be lumpy.

For sure, it will be lumpy, and as evidenced by the first quarter, our harvest so far this year is kind of what we thought it would be for the first year, and Emma gave you some perspective on that.

Thank you. As a reminder, we would like everyone in the queue to limit themselves to one question and one follow-up. Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Steve Sakwa with Evercore ISI. Please proceed with your question.

Great, thank you. Good morning. Maybe Bob, if you could just maybe elaborate a little bit on maybe some of the conversations that you and the team have had with some other C-suite executives, just more around kind of where their head is on the macro. I realize that the problems in the Middle East kind of occurred fairly late in the first quarter, so not much time to impact that business. Maybe that's tempering your enthusiasm for the back half a little bit. Just how are you sort of thinking about leasing and sales, and I guess what would it maybe take to create more challenges in that business moving into the back half of the year?

Yeah. A bunch of different things going on there, Steve. One is what's going to happen specifically with regard to the Middle East, and things that are directly impacted by the Middle East. One is what's going to happen to the economy more broadly. Big theme, obviously, is what's going on with artificial intelligence. Big theme is what's going on with job creation and will jobs disappear? I'll comment on each of those, starting with the economy. People feel generally good about the economy unless energy prices spike to the point where we end up in a situation where there could be a recession in parts of the world that are energy specific or energy sensitive, maybe global recession. I don't think people think that's going to happen, but they're worried about that.

Most companies that we interface with are not particularly impacted by what's specifically going on in the Middle East. If you look at our company, none of our four business segments have as much as 5% of their profits in the Middle East, so it didn't impact us in the first quarter. It hasn't impacted us so far in the second quarter. Most of the companies that we're working with have not been massively impacted or even all that materially impacted, and so they're watching like we are, but not that worried about that specifically. The whole AI job creation or job destruction thing that is unfolding and going and ping-ponging back and forth, lots of discussion around that. Lots of headlines around all the jobs that are going to be eliminated by AI.

We've tried to dig deep and get some kind of empirical underpinning based on the business we do with companies. I will tell you that the market-facing headlines don't sync up very well at all with what's going on in our direct conversations with these clients. To give you a statistic, if really there was this view that all these jobs were going to be eliminated by AI, you would think that the users of space would be backing off on their leasing of space. Not just currently, but you would think they'd be taking shorter term leases for fear that they weren't going to need the space in the future. The average length of lease we're doing in office buildings today hasn't decreased by a day. It simply hasn't decreased. It's held steady for the last several years, and it's holding steady now.

The put your money where your mouth is thing would suggest that the fears around job losses aren't quite as high as the headlines. I can tell you for our company, when we look at what's going on, we anticipate some job loss in certain areas. We have AI initiatives underway to create efficiencies in the company. For instance, we have lots of people in call centers around the world, thousands of them. We think some of that we can rationalize that by maybe as much as 25%. We're going to be able to cut back on research. We're going to be able to cut back on our human resources or people organization.

The most profound thing going on in our business today, as we've moved into critical infrastructure and have built a big business in that area, and again, it was $3 billion last year in our services businesses, already almost a billion in the first quarter. We can't hire enough people. Our biggest challenge is across that business, we're having trouble getting the various skilled people we need. We're not alone in that regard. I'm sure that anybody that's following the market is seeing the same thing. There's a myriad of things going on when we talk to others in our sector and others in the companies we serve. Net-net, I would not say there's a lot of fear about what's going on right now, at least in the foreseeable future.

Great. Thanks for that answer, Bob. Maybe just as a quick follow-up, Emma, I know you talked about the $540 million of buybacks. I think in the Excel file, it showed $530 million of actual buybacks in the quarter. Could you either provide a share count or an average buyback price that's associated with that $500 million? I just want to make sure we have our shares moving forward accurate for the model.

Yes. The price is in the high $140s, around $148.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Stephen Sheldon with William Blair. Please proceed with your question.

Hey, thanks, and really nice results here. First, I wanted to ask about the training partnership with Meta around data center capabilities. Bob, you were just talking a little bit about some of the, you can't hire enough people, I think, in critical infrastructure. I guess, yeah, do you see similar opportunities with other big tech and AI companies? And then as we think about something like that, is it more like a one-time revenue opportunity or they're kind of recurring resilient revenue streams that could be built as you could be supported by a partnership like this? I guess, how are you thinking about these opportunities?

It's definitely not a one-time thing. We're building a capability there in multiple cities around the U.S. to recruit, train, and place technical people to support Meta's data center initiative. It is really, really hard to get those people. We're recruiting and training those people and sending them not only into CBRE's teams to support Meta, but into our competitors and others in the market. They viewed us as having a unique ability to hire and train people. We have a big operation in that regard. We hire something like 30,000 people a year. That we ended up in that position.

The bottom line is, with these companies that we interface with to do critical infrastructure and data center work, there's a broad base of things that we can do to support them, and this is something that surfaced because of our brand and our scale and our breadth here in the U.S. and in other places around the world that we were well positioned to help them with, and we expect this to be an enduring service that we provide.

Very helpful. Maybe then as a follow-up, just around the commentary on average office lease durations holding steady. I would be curious, with Industrious, you guys have the flexible co-working business with Industrious, what have you seen there? Have you seen demand for more flexible space start to pick up? Is that something that could structurally if, let's say, average lease duration start to pull back, would you even potentially see an uptick in demand for solutions like Industrious that give companies more flexibility? I guess, how are you thinking about that?

Yes. The number of Industrious units that we're adding is exceeding our expectation in underwriting when we bought the business. We're quite pleased with the pace at which we're adding those units, and we expect it to continue this year and into the foreseeable future. The thing about that business is that, I think anybody that's been following us knows we bought that business because we thought it was a premium offering that would be interesting to corporates, in addition to small and medium-sized businesses. We're seeing that play out, just like we're seeing strength in every other part of the office market. We're also seeing that Industrious' capability as an experience company is becoming an increasing opportunity for us with our corporate clients on the facilities management side of things. Yeah, we're seeing good momentum there, and we're quite excited about it.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Julien Blouin with Goldman Sachs. Please proceed with your question.

Thank you for taking my question, and congrats on the quarter. Clearly a very strong first quarter, for both investment sales and leasing. I guess, just curious, I know you say the pipelines continue to look very strong. One of your peers last week was commenting on the fact that they are seeing sort of client decision-making slowing down, given the lack of visibility. When you have this sort of instability, long-term investments just become slightly harder to make. I'm just interested, are you seeing any signs of that? If we do end up seeing an impact, is your expectation more that we could see that in EMEA and APAC versus the U.S.?

I think there's more worry in APAC and Asia, and in continental Europe a little bit over the impacts of higher energy prices. We really aren't seeing decision-making slowing down as it relates to industrial leasing or office leasing. Where we're seeing some slower decision-making is corporate capital investment, except for data center investment. We think part of what's going on there is that resources are moving from other types of real estate-related capital investment to data center investment. But there could also be a little uncertainty that's creeping into capital investment. Capital investment is one of those things that tends to slow down a little bit when there is some uncertainty. We have seen some decision-making slow down there, but really not on the leasing side. It hasn't surfaced yet. It certainly hasn't surfaced in data centers.

Obviously, Emma gave you those numbers. It hasn't surfaced as it relates to kind of traditional warehouse leasing, traditional office leasing. Office leasing is strong all around the world, maybe a little less so in Europe. We really aren't seeing yet that slowdown in decision-making. We'll see how things unfold, but we're not seeing it now.

That's very helpful. Maybe going back to the AI topic, I was wondering how your thoughts on the risk from AI have maybe evolved since last quarter. Do you still believe that your BOE segment is where some risk of disintermediation lies and less so on the capital market side? I guess, how do you think about some of these headlines that are out there around sort of smaller AI-based startups, that are reported to be gaining traction in smaller commercial real estate transactions and sort of bypassing traditional brokers in the process? Do you think there's a risk that if they prove themselves at sort of the smaller size transactions that six or 12 months from now, they could be used for $10 million or $20 million transactions?

Yeah. Well, I'll kind of hit that at the end here. I'll walk you through how we think about AI. We start by thinking about it like we do with everything. We are very driven by our strategy, and as you know, our strategy is to be diverse across asset types, service types, geography, and client types. We very definitely have pursued this strategy of pushing resources into areas of secular tailwinds. AI is creating a considerable secular tailwind for our company right now, and it's fairly broad-based, to the point where I think our move into critical infrastructure and data center services is going to be at least as profound as our move into outsourcing was in the 1990's and early 2000, and much faster. Again, I want to reiterate some of the numbers we laid out, $3 billion.

This is independent of our land program in Trammell Crow Company. $3 billion of revenue last year, almost a billion of revenue in the first quarter, growing almost 50% this year. Some very strong opportunities for us to do M&A in that area because of the track record we've established for M&A. This is a good home for targets. It's a good home for employees, and our brand and history positions us well with clients. A lot of opportunity there. We think that's the overwhelming impact to our business. The second thing we look at is what we can do to enhance the products we have. If you go across our four segments, brokerage, building management, project management, we are developing AI-enabled tools in every one of those areas. We've been able to attract some very strong people.

Again, I think our brand and our scale has helped us. There's a lot of interest in real estate. We've been able to attract some technology people and some AI people that have helped us there, and we're very bullish about the products we've developed. I think it's going to help us do more business than we've done before. The next place is in efficiency. This is where there's going to be some potential loss of employees, and I commented on this earlier. We're going to see some efficiency in our offshore service centers. We're going to see some efficiency in the research area, in financial planning and analysis, in human resources. There's a lot of those areas, and we think the gains will be fairly significant.

It's going to take time to get those gains because you have to develop the tools, and then you have to implement the tools, and then you have to reorganize yourself from limits. There'll be some eliminations there. Where we think we're most protected, and I commented on this last quarter, is in our transactional businesses. Our investing businesses, our brokerage businesses, our development business, where you lead with strategy and negotiations and creativity. I know there's been commentary. We've read it, we've seen it. Oh my gosh, in the brokerage business, there's all this data-related and financial analysis-related work that goes on that's going to be squeezed down by AI, which is going to cause revenues to be squeezed down. Well, if you really know how that business works, the vast majority of what we spend in that business goes to our brokers.

The vast majority of what we spend. It doesn't go to financial grinding and analysis and data. We do a lot of work in data. We do a lot of work in financial analysis, but the majority of the expense is around brokers. What the brokers provide is specifically this strategic help, this creative help, this negotiating help, the knowledge that goes beyond the data that's on the street. That's why over the years when I've been asked, "Oh, as you guys get bigger and stronger, are you going to use that leverage to squeeze down your brokers?" The answer has always been no. The real value in that business comes from that creative strategic thinking. It's true in our investing businesses. It's true in Trammell Crow Company. That land development business is not going to be disintermediated by AI. It's going to be enabled by AI.

We're not sitting here today. I'm sure there's going to be ways AI does stuff that it hasn't done before, and we're all going to figure that out over time, but we think we're reasonably well protected there. Then when you hear these anecdotes about some proptech company that says they're disintermediating the brokerage business, I would ask them to show you their revenue stream and see what you get. Thank you very much.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Brendan Lynch with Barclays. Please proceed with your question.

Great. Thanks for taking my questions. Maybe a few follow-ups on the data centers. How is the Pearce acquisition trending versus the $90 million of EBITDA contribution you had originally anticipated for 2026? Maybe in terms of expanding the data center platform, what are some of the other verticals or sub-verticals you could potentially expand into?

Yeah. I'm gonna answer the back half of that question, then Emma. Pearce, by the way, is not a big data center business. It's telecom, power, et cetera. In the data center business, we're seeing big impact in our brokerage business. We're seeing big impact in our building operation and experience business where we form this critical infrastructure line of business, and we're doing a lot of project work there. We're doing a lot of building management work. We do work on over 1,300 data centers around the world. Of course, we're continuing to see Turner & Townsend in our big project business, a lot of work, and we have opportunity to expand all those things. Turner & Townsend has primarily, over the years before we combined with them, been European, Middle East, Asia Pacific business with some activity in the U.S.

Now they're growing rapidly in the U.S., leveraging the network of professionals that CBRE has. On the contrary, our data center services, building management, and small projects business in the white space has been primarily U.S., and now we're seeing a big opportunity to expand that in Europe and Asia. Those are some areas we're focused on, and I think Emma can talk about M&A, but I think if you look at the M&A strategy you have, you'd be confident that there's opportunity for us in those areas around the world. Emma, I don't know what you want to add to that.

Yeah. Just to add on, Pearce, front-end, specifically to your question, it's performing well, in line with our expectations. One important thing to note is, if you take the $600 million and some of revenue that we forecasted for 2026, you can't ratably lay that across the quarters because there is a seasonal element to this business, given that they're maintaining cell towers and wind farms and solar. So if you exclude Pearce in the first quarter, our BOE revenue growth was mid-teens.

Okay, great. Thanks. That's helpful. Maybe just one follow-up. If I heard you correctly, it was about $900 million of embedded profit in the land bank. You talked about dozens of other land opportunities that you could monetize in the future. How should we think about the steady state contribution, understanding it's going to be lumpy, but just your ability to acquire attractively priced land and add some value add components to it and kind of keep that pipeline steady over the next couple of years?

Yeah. The $900 million is not land profits captured in Trammell Crow Company, it's all profits captured in Trammell Crow Company, including land. The data center land opportunity, we have lots of sites that we have the opportunity, the potential opportunity to monetize. It's hard. It's really hard. You have to get approvals, you have to get power, you have to get water. As a result, we have not been overly aggressive about forecasting what might happen there. We're very excited about the potential. We like the portfolio of sites that we have control over. We have very little capital of our own invested in those, by the way. We really like the ability we have to work with hyperscalers and other data center clients to help them get land positions.

Knowing how hard that business is and the scarcity challenges around things you need and the public opposition and so on and so forth, we're being very measured about the outlook we're establishing for that. The $900 million is all the profits we see captured in Trammell Crow Company today.

We are filling that back up at the same rate we're emptying it out, I guess, is what I would say.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Jade Rahmani with KBW. Please proceed with your question.

Thanks very much. I wanted to ask about AI and how you've rolled it out to your teams. Could you quantify what percentage of your teams are using it, and if you're limiting who can use it? What are you doing to maintain a closed loop system in terms of your data, where data is the linchpin of value in that business?

Jade, we're like everybody else. We're working our way through that and trying to figure it out. You didn't say it explicitly, but you kind of implied it. One of the things we're watching very closely is it can get really expensive, really fast if you don't control who has the access to use it and what they can use it for. Our Chief Operating Officer, Vikram Kohli, who's also over our cost control program and specifically has reporting up to him the technology part of our business right now, is watching very closely how we're using AI and where we're using it, how we're using it to improve our products, and where we're using it randomly around the system. As you can imagine, there's a lot of that.

I will just say broadly, that we are controlling it, controlling who has access to it, controlling what we use it for, and we're reasonably pleased, like we have been historically, that we're attacking new technology in a measured way, where the benefit we're getting is in balance with the cost we're expending on it. It's something you got to watch really closely.

Thanks for that. Just switching to transactions. Just wondering if you can give any comment as to whether the pipeline has slowed at all, driven by the increase in rates and also modest widening in the borrowing spreads that we've seen?

Jade, the pipeline hasn't slowed at all. Going into Q2, the pipeline is actually stronger than we would have expected it to be at the beginning of the year. I think what's important to note about rates, and we get asked that a lot is, as long as the ten-year has been around in the 4%-4.5% range, we've seen sales activity and loan origination activity continue to grow and accelerate. As long as there isn't a significant spike above that, we don't expect to see any slowing.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Nicholas Joseph with Citi. Please proceed with your question.

Hey, thanks for taking my question. I guess just wanting to go back a little bit to capital allocation. You did the buybacks in the quarter. Has AI changed the way you think about your capital allocation priorities as you think about buybacks or resilient businesses that bolt on? Or is there any sort of incremental investments or AI companies that you would look to add to the platform?

Our capital allocation priorities remain consistent, and they have over time. We are always prioritizing M&A. If anything, as Bob mentioned earlier, we see even greater opportunity for M&A at this point than we have historically, especially in the data center space. We will continue to prioritize M&A, but of course, as you've seen, as we're monitoring our pipeline and thinking about what we can convert in a year, we're going to fill that in with buybacks, especially when our price remains undervalued. In terms of investing in AI, as Bob said, it's similar to how we invest in technology. We're constantly organically investing through our CapEx in technology and now AI to support our business, and that will remain unchanged. I don't expect us to be investing in specifically AI companies, like we didn't make large investments in technology companies historically.

Thanks. I guess you talked a bit about rationalizing headcount where it makes sense and using AI to increase productivity. It might be a little early, but do you have a sense of how that can change the margin profiles of certain segments over time?

It's very difficult to speculate how it will impact over time, but it will. I think it'll take a number of years, and it will start in our functions. Bob mentioned our HR teams, our shared service teams. Even those headcount reductions, we anticipate happening a few years from now versus immediately. Time will tell in terms of how that will explicitly impact our business.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Ronald Kamdem with Morgan Stanley. Please proceed with your question.

Great. Just a quick one. Going back to sort of the BOE, I think you mentioned earlier in the call that excluding the acquisition, the revenue growth would've been, I think I heard mid-teens, if that's correct. I think the messaging has been that growth rate has been sustainable for quite some time. I guess my question is there a way to sort of double-click and think about how much of that growth is driven by existing tenants, expansion there versus sort of new businesses? Has that mix shifted as the business has changed over the past couple of years? Thanks.

The way we think about that business is between our enterprise facilities management, our local business, and then now our critical infrastructure services business. Enterprise is a solid double-digit grower, low double-digit grower over time. Local, as it's been expanding into new markets, I mentioned earlier, we have still significant growth within the Americas. Our local business grew revenue in the Americas this quarter 30%. That's bringing that growth above that low double-digit range. Our critical infrastructure services business, as you saw, has tremendous growth within it. It is going to keep that growth rate within our BOE segment in that mid-teens range and potentially above over time.

Helpful. I guess my second question is, as I'm sort of thinking about whether it's advisory services versus BOE versus project management at this point in the cycle, is the greatest margin upside still at advisory services because of potential transaction upside? Or how do you guys think about the potential margin uplift in some of those other segments? Thanks.

Advisory has already gone back to the 2019 level of margins, which we think is a relatively steady state margin for that business. There will be steadier and more incremental over time. We see opportunity for those to increase.

Thank you. We have reached the end of the question and answer session. I would like to turn the floor back to CEO Bob Sulentic for closing remarks.

Thanks, everyone, for joining us today, and we'll talk to you again in 90 days when we report on our second quarter.

Thank you. This concludes today's conference, and you may disconnect your line at this time. We thank you for your participation. Have a great day.

CBRE Group (CBRE) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

Company Participants