With a combined revenue of $21 trillion and $2.1 trillion in profits, the 2026 Fortune 500 is the definitive list of America's largest companies.

Fortune 500

The 300 companies on this year’s list brought in over $12.5 trillion in revenue for the latest 12 months, with the median revenue figure at $24 billion.

America's Most Innovative Companies

Almost $20 trillion in revenue—and a record-breaking $1.87 trillion in profits. Introducing the 2025 Fortune 500, the definitive list of the biggest companies in America.

The Fortune 500, in its 70th year in 2024, ranks the biggest U.S. companies by revenue.

The 25th Fortune World’s Most Admired Companies list suggests that tech giants’ peers respect them as much as ever.

World's Most Admired Companies

The Fortune 500, in its 69th year in 2023, ranks the biggest U.S. companies by revenue.

This year’s Fortune 500 marks the 68th running of the list.

After a year in which humanity leaned more heavily than ever on tech giants, see which companies topped Fortune's ranking of corporate reputation.

This year’s Fortune 500 marks the 67th running of the list.

For an astounding 13th straight year, Apple claims the top spot in Fortune’s annual ranking of corporate reputation, based on a survey of almost 3,800 executives, directors, and analysts.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 66th running of the list.

F500-2020-465-Apache

The oil and gas exploration and production company operates in the U.S., Egypt, and the U.K. and has exploration activities offshore of Suriname.

Here are the World's Most Admired Companies for 2019 as ranked in their industries. See who made the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 65th running of the list.

Here are the World's Most Admired Companies for 2018 as ranked in their industries. See who made the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 64th running of the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 63rd running of the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 62nd running of the list.

Business insiders have spoken: Asked which companies they most admire, more than 4,100 executives, directors, and analysts chose these top 50 All-Stars.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 61st running of the list. Wal-Mart claims the top spot again. See who made the list.

Wal-Mart stayed on top as its sales crept closer to half-a-trillion dollars. Apple moved into the top five. And UnitedHealth Group continued its steady climb. 

Sector

Industry

Industry Rank

Previous Industry Rank

Overall Score

Innovation

People Management

Use of Corporate Assets

Social Responsibility

Quality of Management

Financial Soundness

Long-Term Investment Value

Quality of Products/Services

Global Competitiveness

Strongest Dimension

Years on list

Previous rank

State

Key Financials (last Fiscal Year)

Revenues ($M)

Profits ($M)

Assets ($M)

Total Stockholder Equity ($M)

Profit Ratios

Profit as % of Revenues

Profits as % of Assets

Profits as % of Stockholder Equity

Earnings Per Share (last Fiscal Year)

Earnings Per Share ($)

EPS % Change (from prior fiscal year)

EPS % Change (5 year annual rate)

EPS % Change (10 year annual rate)

Total Return

Total Return to Investors (last year)

Total Return to Investors (5 year, annualized)

Total Return to Investors (10 year, annualized)

APA, best known through its Apache subsidiary, is an independent energy company specializing in the exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. Operating primarily in the Permian Basin, as well as in Egypt, the North Sea, and Suriname, APA focuses on delivering reliable and affordable energy to meet global demand. The company is committed to sustainable practices and leverages advanced technologies, including artificial intelligence, to enhance operational efficiency and reduce environmental impact.

Q2 2026

Q1 2026

Q4 2025

Q3 2025

Q2 2025

Q1 2025

Q4 2024

Q3 2024

APA (APA): Company Profile, Stock Price, News, Rankings

legacy

thank you for standing by. Welcome to the APA Corporation's First Quarter twenty twenty five Results Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen only mode. After the speakers' presentation, there will be a question and answer session. Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded.

I would now like to hand the conference over to your first speaker today, Ben Rogers, Senior Vice President of Finance and Treasurer. Please go ahead.

Good morning, and thank you for joining us on APA Corporation's first quarter twenty twenty five financial and operational results conference call. We will begin the call with an overview by CEO, John Christmann. Steve Riney, President and CFO, will then provide further color on our results and outlook. Tracy Henderson, Executive Vice President of Exploration, is also on the call and available to answer questions. We will start with prepared remarks and allocate the remainder of time to Q and A.

In conjunction with yesterday's press release, I hope you have had the opportunity to review our financial and operational supplement, which can be found on our Investor Relations website at investor.apacorp.com. Please note that we may discuss certain non GAAP financial measures. A reconciliation of the differences between these measures and the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures can be found in the supplemental information provided on our website. Consistent with previous reporting practices, adjusted production numbers cited in today's call are adjusted to exclude non controlling interest in Egypt and Egypt tax barrels. I'd like to remind everyone that today's discussion will contain forward looking estimates and assumptions based on our current views and reasonable expectations.

However, a number of factors could cause actual results to differ materially from what we discuss on today's call. A full disclaimer is located with the supplemental information on our website. And with that, I will turn the call over to John.

Good morning, and thank you for joining us. Today, I will provide an overview of our first quarter results, share an update on our cost reduction initiatives and provide details on how significant improvements in operating performance are allowing us to protect our free cash flow outlook despite the current commodity price volatility. We delivered strong first quarter results with in line production and lower capital investment relative to guidance. In the Permian, oil production was within our guidance range despite a 1,000 barrel per day larger impact from third party and weather related downtime than was anticipated when we gave guidance. Capital came in below guidance largely due to significant improvements in drilling performance.

In Egypt, we are highly encouraged by the prospectivity for natural gas. First quarter gas production exceeded guidance due to outperformance from our recent development program, along with continued efforts to optimize existing infrastructure. Despite shifting activity to gas, oil drilling is progressing well and we continue to see positive results from our waterflood implementation programs where we see additional running room with very favorable returns. In the North Sea, volumes were ahead of guidance primarily driven by strong operational efficiency at Barrel. On the exploration front, we announced our second discovery, Sockeye 2, in the Brookian play across our three and twenty five thousand acre footprint.

The King Street 1 discovery in 2024 initially confirmed a working hydrocarbon system approximately 90 miles east of the Pika development with high quality pay in two separate hydrocarbon zones. Earlier this year, the Sockeye 2 well encountered 25 feet of net oil pay with an API oil gravity of approximately 28 degrees and a GOR of seven twenty across one consistent sand package with seismic amplitude supporting the stratigraphic feature across 25,000 to 30,000 acres. We subsequently conducted a flow test that confirmed anticipated rock properties much better than regional analogs, including an average permeability of 100 to 125 millidarcie and a 20% porosity. Technical evaluation is underway to determine next steps for both the exploration and appraisal programs. I will turn now to our cost reduction initiatives, where we are making significant strides.

Commensurate with our simplified portfolio, we are committed to sustainably reducing our controllable spend across capital, LOE and overhead. Our overall progress on these initiatives has been impressive, giving us the confidence to increase both our twenty twenty five targets for realized savings to $130,000,000 and the annualized run rate savings by the end of the year to $225,000,000 Of note, capital efficiencies are getting captured much faster than we expected. Permian drilling efficiencies are the largest driver of capital savings. We are also making good progress on both completions and facilities. Overall, our objective is to achieve top quartile operational performance in the Permian and we are confident we're on track to deliver that.

In Egypt, we are also seeing savings in drilling costs driven by continued refinement of our operating practices. Moving to LOE. In the Permian while we continue pursuing near term opportunities to reduce certain operating costs we are experiencing upward pressure on other cost areas in the short term. Material savings will come from structural changes to how we operate including such items as water handling, compression and power procurement. We see opportunities for substantial long term reductions in these costs, but achieving them will require extended execution timeframes.

On the international front, we have lowered Egypt operating costs through efforts like accelerating diesel reduction projects and optimizing equipment rentals and in the North Sea rationalized offshore activity as we transition to late life operations. On the G and A front, we are accelerating the capture of cost reductions, which is also contributing to our increased savings targets for 2025. These savings not only come from streamlining our organization, but are also realized in multiple areas of discretionary third party spend. This momentum is expected to continue through the year and is proving to be sustainable as we simplify how we manage our assets. As we continue to right size our organizational structure and work processes to better align with our current portfolio, we're further refining our operating model and leadership structure.

Among other things, would like to personally congratulate Ben Rogers on being named Chief Financial Officer effective next week. Many of you on the call have had the opportunity to interact with Ben over the past few years, and I am eager to work more closely with him as the new head of our finance pillar with a continued focus on managing our cost structure. In the same spirit, I would like to thank Steve and acknowledge his invaluable contributions and thought leadership over financial and strategic matters through the years. I look forward to his continued contributions as he brings the same rigor and focus to our operations and development organizations, where his impact has already made a difference since his promotion to President last year. Before discussing our updated 2025 outlook, let me comment on the asset sale we announced in our press release yesterday.

Subsequent to the first quarter, we signed an agreement to monetize our New Mexico Permian properties for $6.00 $8,000,000 These assets, which contributed approximately 5,000 barrels per day of oil production during the first quarter, represent less than 5% of both our Permian oil production and unconventional acreage position. We intend to allocate most of the proceeds from this divestiture toward debt reduction. This sale fits with the continued streamlining of our portfolio and reflects a full exit from New Mexico, allowing us to focus solely on the Texas side of the basin. The transaction is expected to close late in the second quarter. In keeping with prior practice, our forward guidance at this time continues to include these assets and will be adjusted post close.

Turning now to our revised outlook for the remainder of the year. Let me start by emphasizing the rapidly improving drilling efficiency we are seeing in the Permian. As we progress the integration of Cowan, we reduced activity to eight drilling rigs late last year to sustain flat oil volumes in the Permian. Given the confidence in the operating efficiency gains, we can now hold oil volumes sustainably flat beyond 2025 with 6.5 rigs. Anticipating continual efficiency improvements, we are in the process of reducing to six rigs by the end of this quarter, and will reduce activity further if oil prices continue to deteriorate.

We are also adjusting our frac fleets and completion schedule to better align with the lower rig count going forward. This will result in several wells for 2025 being turned in line later than originally planned, but we still expect to deliver oil volumes within our guidance range of 125,000 to 127,000 barrels per day. The combination of changes in completion timing and significant capital efficiency gains in the Permian is driving the bulk of our $150,000,000 reduction in development capital guidance for the year. In Egypt, with the success of the gas program and the softness of oil prices, we have shifted rig activity to be approximately one third gas focused. Our second quarter guidance contemplates continued growth to four seventy million cubic feet per day gross gas volumes, and we anticipate ongoing strong performance in the second half of the year.

Commensurate with this outlook, we expect our average realized gas price to continue to increase through the fourth quarter and into next year. This highlights how Egypt enhances the diversity of our portfolio and our capital allocation optionality. The new gas price agreement has brought gas focused development into economic parity with oil drilling at mid cycle Brent prices, making gas opportunities at today's oil strip more attractive on a relative basis. In addition, the production sharing contract in Egypt provides downside protection through the cost recovery mechanism, a natural hedge against lower Brent oil pricing. In closing, we are making substantial progress on our cost initiatives, particularly in Permian well costs and our overhead cost structure.

Structure. This has allowed us to more than double our controllable spend savings targets for the year and reduce the capital intensity required to sustain longer term production volumes. Together, these protect free cash flow in a volatile oil price environment. We will continue to balance the goals of sustaining and growing our business with returns to shareholders and further balance sheet strengthening. Our focus on cost reductions and capital efficiency for the near term will underpin free cash flow through 2027 ahead of Suriname First oil in 2028, which will significantly accelerate further growth.

We believe that the resultant free cash flow growth profile coupled with our high quality exploration portfolio is differentiated from many of our peers and will drive growth in long term shareholder value. And with that, I will turn the call over to Steve.

Thank you, John. I will begin my remarks with an overview of our first quarter results and then provide further commentary on our cost reduction initiatives and our updated plans for the rest of this year. For the first quarter, under generally accepted accounting principles, APA reported consolidated net income of $347,000,000 or $0.96 per diluted common share. As usual, these results include items that are outside of core earnings, the most significant of which was a $111,000,000 after tax gain on the extinguishment of debt and a $76,000,000 charge to increase our deferred tax liability in The UK due to the most recent increase in the energy profits levy. Excluding these and other smaller items, adjusted net income for the first quarter was $385,000,000 or $1.06 per share.

Let me start my comments on first quarter highlights with a couple items from Egypt. I want to specifically recognize the significant progress that the Egyptian government has made towards normalizing our past due receivables. APA generated $126,000,000 of free cash flow in the first quarter, but this does not include the progress we made on past due balances during the quarter, and that progress has now continued into the second quarter. Today, our past due balances in Egypt are the lowest they have been since the end of twenty twenty two. Also in Egypt, gas development is going very well, and increasing production volumes have led to an average realized gas price of $3.19 in the quarter, exceeding our guidance of $3.15 This is up from our fourth quarter average of 2.97 The combined benefit of substantial recent progress on payments and the new gas pricing agreement have been critical factors in a decision to maintain our planned activity levels in Egypt, albeit with a shift to more gas focused drilling.

First quarter upstream capital came in quite a bit below guidance despite some accelerated spend in Suriname. This was a direct result of the outstanding operational results delivered by our Permian drilling teams, where drilling efficiencies have seen step change improvements compared to 2024. Let me now turn to progress on our cost reduction efforts. As a reminder, our efforts to rationalize our cost structure began almost a year ago with a primary objective to drive sustainable cost savings for the long term. When we spoke about these initiatives on the February earnings call, we did not provide a breakdown of targeted savings between the various cost categories.

We knew that overhead would be the largest initial contributor because that was the logical first target. However, we expected capital would be the largest contributor in the long term. Given the progress achieved through Permian drilling efficiencies, savings on capital will now provide the vast majority of our controllable spend reductions this year. Since the beginning of the year, we have captured an impressive $800,000 in cost savings per well in the Permian, and we still see additional room for improvement going forward. We have made significant improvements including slim hole drilling, modifying casing stream designs, and utilizing fit for purpose directional tools that have considerably shortened our drilling durations.

Looking ahead to the rest of the year, we see additional improvements that are expected to drive further momentum into 2026. Completions and facilities costs also represent large reduction opportunities for us, and we are beginning to see progress. As we continue to optimize economic resource recovery, a number of development patterns will shift toward a combination of denser well spacing per DSU with smaller fracs, leading to additional drilling cost savings due to fewer rig moves, as well as lower completion costs due to the smaller frac loading. On the facility side, through 2023 and 2024 and into 2025, we built a number of new facilities in areas where drilling activity was going to be growing. For the remainder of this year and into 2026, we will be much more dependent on brownfield modifications instead of new builds, resulting in additional capital savings relative to the recent past.

On LOE, as John mentioned, our original targets contemplated an aggregate level of cost reduction that is proving challenging to achieve. While we are making good progress in some areas, we are also seeing some underlying pressure in others. This includes items like compression and water disposal, where we have experienced some inflationary pressures. As a result, we expect more meaningful progress on LOE savings will likely come later this year and beyond. Finally, on overhead costs.

While our initial focus centered primarily on headcount rationalization, we are now also looking to streamline some of our more complex workflows. In particular, we are eliminating lower value activities, standardizing and simplifying routine work processes, expanding the use of more efficient technologies, and broadening leadership spans of control. While some of these efforts will take more time to implement, we are progressing faster than previously anticipated, which is also contributing to our increased 2025 savings targets. Moving now to our outlook for this year. John touched on a number of topics related to our forward outlook, so I will comment on a few other items.

The progress we have made on reducing controllable spending capital and overhead more than doubles our expected realized cost savings in 2025 despite increases in LOE. We've updated our guidance to reflect these changes while purposefully segregating activity reductions, deferrals and other items, excluding them from our accounting for savings on controllable spend. While these types of items will support free cash flow in 2025, we want to clearly distinguish sustainable reductions from timing related differences for the year. Please refer to our supplement for further details. In Egypt, with over a third of this year's activity geared toward gas, we expect gross gas volumes to continue growing from first quarter levels.

Despite some planned downtime due to plant maintenance, we expect gross gas volumes in the fourth quarter to be the highest of the year, and we anticipate exiting the year around 500,000,000 cubic feet per day. Gas price realizations will steadily increase in line with this trajectory from approximately $3.4 in the second quarter to $3.8 in the fourth quarter, putting us at the upper end of our prior guidance of $3.4 to $3.5 per Mcf for the full year. Turning now to US gas marketing, a part of our business that has proven particularly profitable for us over the last few years. As a reminder, APA sells all Permian gas production in basin and holds approximately seven fifty million BTUs a day of firm capacity on various gas pipelines. Every day, we buy gas at Waha and transport that gas to the Gulf Coast where it is sold at various price points.

Based on current Waha differentials, this is a very profitable activity. Income generated from our firm capacity contracts along with our LNG sales contract with Cheniere are reflected in our guidance and financials as purchased oil and gas sales and costs. APA has entered into basis swap agreements for the second through fourth quarters of twenty twenty five on roughly two thirds of our firm transport capacity. Including actual profits in the first quarter, this locked in approximately $450,000,000 of income for the year. Our 2025 guidance for income from third party oil and gas marketing has been updated to $575,000,000 inclusive of these basis hedges.

Lastly, I would like to quickly touch on some changes we have made to our upstream capital and free cash flow definitions around the treatment of ARO and leasehold acquisitions. Previously, cash ARO expense and leasehold acquisitions were included in our definition of upstream capital. Starting in 2025, we have removed both ARO and leasehold from upstream capital and are now including these as individual line items in our reconciliation to free cash flow. Note that these changes have no impact on how we report free cash flow, and we have provided the new definitions along with a reconciliation of the changes in our supplement. Please reach out to our IR team if you require any clarification.

And with that, I will turn the call over to the operator for Q and A.

A. Our first question will be coming from John Freeman of Raymond James. John, your line is open.

Thanks. I wanted to dig in a little bit more to the cost savings that you all have achieved already on the controllable spend. So the original guide that you all gave last quarter of getting down to that 3,700,000,000.0 or $350,000,000 run rate savings by the year end '27. Given the fact that you've basically doubled what you thought you were going to achieve this year, do we just think of it as that original sort of timeline that you all showed last quarter, it just got pulled forward, but you're not necessarily increasing the absolute target like the $350,000,000 run rate savings by year in '27 is being achieved quicker. But is there any thought of that number potentially moving higher?

Yeah, John, you're exactly right. I mean, at this point, we're way ahead of schedule. Obviously, now we've gone from 125 at year end on a run rate basis to two twenty five. So we're well on our way. I do anticipate that number will get raised at a later date, but today that's we're going to leave that intact and keep working away.

The other thing of note is if you look at in year savings, we've gone from 60,000,000 in year to now 130,000,000 in year. So we're making really, really good progress. And I do anticipate at some point in the future, you'll see that three fifty number go up. But today, we're going to leave it intact.

Understood. And then my follow-up question in the Permian where you've talked about being able to now go from what used to be eight rigs needed to hold U. Production flat. You can now do with six rigs. I'm sorry, with 6.5 rigs.

Would you all plan to go down to six rigs? Do I think of it as that's slightly less than you all would you basically can't hold production flat at that level or you think that at some point later this year, you're gonna have additional efficiency gains in that six and a half now becomes six to hold production five.

Yeah. That's exactly where we are. We came into the year with eight rigs. Today, we think we can hold the 125,000 to 127,000 barrels a day in the Permian Flat was 6.5. But we're seeing signs of further efficiencies, which is why we're confident we can go ahead and drop two rigs and go on down to six, which we believe will hold it flat.

Quite frankly, we think we can do so well in the twenty twenty six.

That's great. Thanks, John. Appreciate it.

And our next question will be coming from Doug Leggett of Wolfe Research. Your line is open, Doug.

Thank you. Thank you, guys. Sorry, John, to pound on this topic that the other John just asked about. But I'm just wondering when we think about the pace of the cost delivery that you're now, especially the capital side of it, what had you originally assumed when you gave us the $3.50 in terms of rig cadence, I guess the $800,000 per well that you talked about. I mean, those in your original $3.50 numbers?

Or is this a moving target? I'm trying to get a feel for, although you're not willing to give us a new number today, What was embedded in that original target versus what you've done so far as quickly as you've done it?

Yeah, I mean, I'd say we set aggressive targets, 125 that we plan to capture by year end. We set some aggressive targets and you saw that in the LOE numbers. Obviously, the overhead was a piece. We said the capital was the biggest piece, but we thought that would come later and it's coming earlier. So, we knew we could drive costs down.

So I would say, you know, those savings were in that $3.50, but they're just coming faster. And and we think there's more to do.

Okay. So my follow-up is I wanted to take advantage of Tracy being on the call and ask a question about Alaska. I know it's very early days, but you've got a couple of wells now that are fairly well apart and some pretty good analogs if you look at peak hour flow rates from Willow when it was eventually tested. Those wells, as I understand, were fractured, yours was not. So can you offer any insight as to what you're thinking in terms of resource size?

And if I can add a part b, this is a bit of an obtuse one. I think there's a concern that, okay, here we go. We've got another major capital development that Apache has 50% of. How would you plan on funding it? Would you ever consider monetizing part of Suriname to fund Alaska?

Well, Doug, if if if you step back, we've got a 300, and I'll let Tracy chime in in a couple minutes. But we've got 325,000 acres It's state lands, you know, with the King Street discovery last year. It did two things. It proved we had high quality reservoir sands, 90 miles east of Pico. We went back to Sockeye this year because we had the best seismic image over there.

It is not the largest feature by any means, but it was the one we felt pretty confident would test geologic geophysical model and as well as the whole acreage position. Obviously, it came in, but I'd say the surprise in there was the quality of the reservoir sands, which are actually better than expected. So it's a material discovery. It's high quality oil, low GOR seven twenty, but it's one continuous package of sand 20% porosity. But the big kicker in here is the permeability, know, with 100 to 125 millidarcys, which is quite a bit better, you know, then the developments that are taking place.

I think the thing you look at now, a big portion of our acreage, we are in the process of reprocessing that seismic and quite frankly, the largest prospects sits on the area we are reprocessing. So we're not going to be going at this hard on the capital side. We're going to be really smart about how we appraise and quite frankly, what we would drill next on the exploration side. But if you look at timing on your second part B question, you look at timing on Suriname, you're going to have Suriname coming on well before you'd have meaningful capital spend here. So Tracy, you can jump in on the reservoir quality a little bit more about it geologically.

Sure, John. Thanks. One of the things we're most encouraged by really is the reservoir quality as John mentioned, where we know we have something to work with. Our permeabilities are easily two to four times better than analog fields to the West, and that's critical for how we go about developing fields. So our focus right now is on reprocessing the data, as John said, but also developing an appraisal strategy, which will include things like number of wells, development scenarios.

You saw in the press release the well flowed 2,700 barrels a day unstimulated and that was limited by tubulars. So we'll be looking at things like potential for water flood, which is a possibility given the reservoir quality that we have, horizontal wells. Those will all be things that we need to think about and what development scenarios will look like. So we've got a lot to do to frame the path forward. Appraisal program will be what will ultimately inform what we will come out with in terms of size of the resource here.

So we've got a lot of work to do, but we are very excited. One of the limiting factors that we have really is winter access, so we really need to be measured in how we plan our activities. The work we're going to be focused on in the near term is going to be seismic reprocessing and looking at appraisal strategies. We need to do that work so we understand how we want to appraise and look at development scenarios going forward.

I'll give everyone a giggle here. Think your partner, Bill Armstrong, described the looked areas on that Brooklyn play as next Guyana. So we're watching with a lot of interest. We'll see. Anyway, thanks very much indeed, guys.

And our next question will be coming from Scott Gruber of Citigroup. Your line is open, Scott.

Yes. Good morning. I wanted to come back to the asset sale. As

of the motivation to sell the New Mexico position beyond the non op aspect, part of the motivation there what you're seeing across the rest of the Permian portfolio? It's been about a year since the Callon closed, you altered the development program there. So is that acreage surprising the positive? Or are the drilling efficiencies making legacy acreage even more attractive? Maybe it's both.

Yeah, if you step back on the, you know, New Mexico assets, what we had remaining in the Mexico is good rock, but it's very small. It's less than 5% of our production. It's less than 5% of our, you know, our acreage is scattered. Some of it was non op for us. It was a package that we didn't have to sell, but we put in the market.

It was highly contested, you know, and so, you know, a lot of interest and quite frankly, we felt like because of the price it made sense to transact. We feel like we got full price, obviously, Permian Resources is happy with it as well. But we think it's a good transaction, especially for us and the proceeds are going to predominantly go to debt pay down. Ben, anything you want to add?

Yeah, I'll just say, outside of the strategic reasons for getting out of New Mexico, you think about value here. And as John said, a very competitive process. When you look at it, bunch of different valuation ways to look at it, but in the mid to high fives on an EBITDA multiple, really good value for us. We'll use the proceeds to pay down debt and focus on the Texas side of the basin.

Yeah, I'd just add to that, that this is an area that really got sparing capital allocated for the last several years. And it's one that just didn't compete with the core other Permian Basin assets that we have in the Delaware and in the Southern Midland Basin for capital.

Yes. So I was curious whether the rest of the portfolio is getting better. And maybe turning to LOE side of things, you mentioned the need to take some longer term initiatives to address some of the inflation there and compression and water. Just some more color on those initiatives, whether there's CapEx associated and what kind of timeline should we think about to see the benefit?

Yeah, if I could just maybe step back a bit on Permian LOE. Coming into the year, we set a plan that perhaps was a bit ambitious with some embedded savings already built into it. And those are materializing a little bit slower than we had hoped. And in addition to that, as mentioned in my prepared remarks, we are seeing some inflationary pressures too. And compression costs and water disposal, in particular ones where we're seeing those.

So we're going to get there on LOE in the Permian. It might take a little bit longer. We're looking at all options that some might involve some capital investment, some probably do not. Some of them might be just commercial negotiations and getting after the embedded cost structure both in our assets historical and in the Cowen assets as well. But we certainly believe at this point, just like G and A and the CapEx, LOE is going be a meaningful part of the $350,000,000 of cost savings that we've targeted for the next three years.

We're just going to take a little bit more time to get there. We'll be getting there later this year and into 2026.

One moment for our next question. Our next question will be coming from Arun Jayaram of JPMorgan Securities. Your line is open.

Yeah. Good morning. I wanted to go through your plans to kind of evolve or migrate your completion design in the Permian. I know when you guys announced the Calin merger, John, Steve, one of the first steps that you did was to maybe relax spacing in your DSUs. So I wanted to see if you could elaborate on maybe the decision to move to tighter spacing.

Is this in the Delaware? And maybe just give us some thoughts around that decision.

I think Arun, it's just overall in the basin. I mean, did relax spacing and with the wider spacing and larger fracs on the Cowen side. I would say over time though, as we look in areas, we're starting to move more to a little tighter spacing with smaller fracs in areas. So I think it's more the evolution of the basin. And as we look at it today, a lot of the areas where we're focusing our capital, are drilling on tighter spacing than what we have historically.

With the well costs coming down and smaller fracs, we can more efficiently develop the resource, but let Steve jump in on a few points as well.

Yeah, this is the type of thing that comes up every time we get questions associated with our Permian inventory and we haven't come to the market for quite some time with a transparent view and thorough view of our inventory in the Permian, and we are working on that. We've talked about that in the past. We're deep in the process of characterizing everything that we've gotten with the Callon acquisition. We're also characterizing some remaining legacy Apache inventory that we haven't gotten to yet. And all of that inventory, the quantum of inventory is increasing with what we're planning to do on the density side.

And that is actually turning out now to be a bit of shooting at a moving target on the density side because every time we get cost reductions, it naturally will increase the economic density of drilling in the Permian. Every time you increase the density of the wells, you're increasing not just the well count in drilling unit, but also the EUR in the drilling unit. And so, the more you drive down costs, what we've achieved on the $800,000 per well in the first quarter of this year, The more you do that, the more you're going back and saying, this further increases the density possibility of drilling in the Permian. And that's what we're looking at. What we've said in the past and we will do this, we will come out later this year or early next year with a more thorough view of all of our inventory.

But just recognize for everybody that that is a moving target as you drive costs down. Things that were uneconomic or marginally economic before become economic in that process.

Great. I know investors would welcome that type of analysis, Steve, so look forward to that. Maybe one for Ben. It looks like the proceeds from the New Mexico asset sale will be targeted towards debt reduction. So maybe looking for some color, Ben, how you think about repurchasing debt.

I some of your debt is trading at 25% discount to par. But you obviously have some other items such as repaying the term loan or taking out debt as it matures. So where's your head at in terms of using asset sales proceeds in terms of the debt stack?

Sure. No. So we paid off the Callon term loan in the first quarter with a mix of cash we had on hand and some revolver borrowings. So the revolver balance that you see at the end of the quarter, which was a mix of revolver borrowings and commercial paper, was a result of fully paying off the Callon term loan. So that's good.

Had some interest expense savings on that. When we look really for the rest of the year and through our maturity profile through 02/1930, that's where a lot of our focus is going to be. We do recognize that there's some debt that's trading below par, and that's inclusive of that time period even between now and the February. So, we'll pay down the revolver and have a bunch of liquidity. We've got a lot of different options that we can look at.

We think of it in a lot of different ways. One way is on a yield basis. So to your point, with those bonds trading below par, that yield is higher than the cost of us to borrow on the revolver. So we'll be opportunistic as we go through the year and have a lot of tools because of the liquidity pickup from paying down the revolver.

our next question will be coming from Betty Jiang of Barclays. Your line is open, Betty.

Hi, good morning. Thank you for taking my question. I think it will be really helpful to get some color reconciling back on the cost optimization, the 130,000,000 average saving for the year to the 225,000,000 run rate expected for year end twenty five. What's driving that increase in run rate over the course of the year? So specifically, I'm wondering if you're already seeing a 800,000.0 saving on the Permian well cost to date.

Are you assuming that's going to double from here?

Yeah, so good question, Betty. We increased the 60,000,000 realized this year by $70,000,000 to capture $130 to get to the run rate to the $225,000,000 that's just expecting that as we get into 'twenty six, a lot of the capital savings that we have by running just the six rigs and additional progress we'll make on overhead. And then to Steve's point, on the LOE side, we'll make some progress on LOE this year, but really expect a lot of that to come in 'twenty six and 'twenty seven. And so that's what's implied in that run rate of 02/25 is that a continued acceleration of capturing those cost savings, again, by reduced activity in the Permian while still holding production flat, and then continuing to capture savings with overhead and pickup in LOE.

The $800,000 of savings per well is delivering the majority of that increase to 2 and $25,000 run rate at the end of the year.

And the other factor is is Million. Yeah. Back half of the year, anything we capture now will be full year for '26. And so the captured in year number now going from 60 to one thirty, you're actually at a higher run rate on an annualized basis going forward. And so it's really what's captured inside this year versus what the run rate on the overall program would be going into next year.

Got it. That's helpful. Seems like it's been more driven by the overhead and LE. Maybe my follow-up is just on the LE front. Could you give some specific example on what you're expecting to see on the LE side to offset the inflationary pressure that you have seen today?

Yeah, there are going to be a lot of things that we're going to be looking at everywhere from the basic day to day route optimizations of pumpers all the way to the contracting of produced water disposal and compression. We contracts for things like that that come due throughout the year and throughout years. Every time that one of those comes available, you have the opportunity to renegotiate. So a lot of this stuff is going

internally focused on how we work, work operating practices, how we work out in the field, how we manage day to day activity, and then other aspects of it will be externally focused negotiating with vendors, everything from chemicals to all other forms of services.

APA (APA) Q1 2025 Earnings Call Transcript

Company Participants