Trying to steer clear of the clunkers lurking at your local wheels dealership? Then you may wish to avoid these autos.
Get Data Sheet, Fortune’s technology newsletter.
Out of the all the latest models, these cars ranked lowest in their respective categories, according to Consumer Reports. The product reviewer’s leaderboard—or loser-board, in this case—grades the 10 types of vehicles based on several metrics, including road testing, reliability, owner satisfaction, and safety scores.
Read more: “Here’s the reason Tesla can get away with reliability issues”
Each of the following—sedans, trucks, and SUVs ranging from Mitsubishi (MSBHY) to Daimler’s (DDAIF) Mercedes Benz—weren’t up to snuff, by Consumer Reports measure. The list of “lemons” spans Ford (F) to Fiat Chrysler (FCAU), and General Motors (GM) to Tata’s (TTM) Land Rovers.
For more on cars, watch:
“In other words,” writes Consumer Reports, clarifying its anti-endorsements, “every other model in those categories is a better choice.” Ouch.
For the glass-half-full lot however, consider that these models are at least likely to be sticker price negotiable.
[playbuzz-item url=”//www.playbuzz.com/fortune/10-worst-rated-cars-of-2016″]